About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Job 1: Keeping Families Together

by: Dean Barker

Fri Nov 19, 2010 at 21:25:51 PM EST


Well funded groups with wholesome sounding names like "Cornerstone" are preparing to attack marriage, to overturn established law, to revoke civil rights, to rip families apart.

Happy, healthy families are the vital center of society.

We must do everything we can to protect the families in New Hampshire that are being targeted for dissolution.

Dean Barker :: Job 1: Keeping Families Together
From the eve of the election, exhausted activists began talking, organizing, planning the way forward under the new reality of the a veto proof majority.

Today we learned that majority will be led by a radical.

This is not the time for petty grievances, turf wars, or jockeying for position. Nor for reliving the marriage equality struggle. Someone who played a trivial role in this achievement of this civil right will get a statue in her name someday.  Someone who was critical in the passage of marriage in New Hampshire will be utterly forgotten by the history books. And none of it matters.

What matters is keeping married couples from being harmed.  From families being ripped apart by government intrusion into their private lives.  From the law of the land here in the Granite State being yanked away by out-of-state hate money.

What matters is that we work with a maximum of coordination and discipline.  That we work together, and tirelessly.  That we pursue every avenue, that we communicate with everyone.

We, all of us, have a great burden to share in this struggle.  The votes are stacked against us, and the venom directed at the families we cherish will be toxic and relentless.  Together, we can shoulder this burden, and perhaps even fend off this attack.  But not if we point fingers and retreat into cliques and seek glory individually. Do that, and we lose. Much more importantly, families will lose.

This is an all-hands-on-deck emergency. Every one of you has a skill or set of skills that played a role in your election activism.  Those skills will be needed again to fight for our married friends and relatives.  For our children's rights and happiness.

At this early stage, the primary goal I have set for myself is simple communication.  Do your relatives know that some marriages in this state are in direct peril?  They might not. Do your friends know the rights of some their friends stand to be lost? Is the business community aware of the loss of opportunity that comes with revoking this right? Will they all be ready to shout in Concord's direction with a thunderous voice when the time comes?

For my part, I hope to be able to tell the stories of some those endangered families here in the Granite State. I wanted nothing more after the election than to take a two months' long nap; but there's no time for that anymore.  The time for waking up the good and decent and freedom loving people of New Hampshire to this nanny state threat is now.

I celebrated my 10th wedding anniversary this year.  That I could do so in a place where some of my taxpaying, patriotic friends also could only made my own marriage stronger, my happiness of living in New Hampshire greater.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
We Need To Show Our Faces And Tell Our Stories (0.00 / 0)
i'll be writing much more on public strategy in a few days, but one thing everyone who supports marriage equality can start doing is contacting all the House and Senate members in their towns and cities.  

Be respectful, but do what we did to get House Bill 436 passed in 2009 -- show our faces and tell our stories.  Remember, our cause for passage of the bill began in late 2008 into the Spring of 2009 at a time when all Democrats weren't even supportive.  I was being told not to go ahead with the introduction of the bill, and that it wouldn't even get 50 votes.  So we won one supporter at a time.  

A lot of the new House and Senate members really watched this issue from the sidelines.  Now that they'll be making the decision on whether to take rights AWAY from New Hampshire citizens, they need to learn what that will do to real people.  

Let's be respectful, and appeal to the higher angel in each member of the House, Republican and Democrat.  

We can do this.  We already have.  


Human rights flow from our natural attributes, including our (4.00 / 1)
inclination, as social organisms, to associate with others of our own kind.  Such rights can't be removed.  However, we can be deprived of the ability to exercise our rights -- i.e. we can be deprived of our freedom to act.  
Under our system of social organization, such deprivation is supposed to be reserved for individuals whose behavior injures or insults others--i.e. as punishment for crime.  To impose deprivation in the interest of prompting some other desired (good) behavior is, basically perverse.  

'Cause, if you're going to punish to prompt good behavior, what are you going to do in response to the bad?  What are you going to do when all you've got left is capital punishment --i.e. killing people who do bad? You're going to find yourself in a really sorry state.  Sort of a mega "biting off your nose to spite your face."

People of good will are going to continue to associate and care for each other.  There's no question about that.  The question is whether we are going to let other people get away with attacking and visiting deprivation on people who are doing good.  'Cause, when you come right down to it, deprivation of rights that's not justified by some bad behavior is the very essence of crime.  So, what those who propose to deprive others of their beneficial associations under cover of law are promoting is legalized crime.  

It wouldn't be the first time.  Slavery, you'll recall, was legal.  Slavery was not only a legal status; it was passed down from generation to generation as an inheritance.  Clearly, the rule of law can be perverted to be quite vicious.  So, the question, again, is whether we are going to permit that.  When one person is subject to unjust deprivation, we are all deprived.  That's why Jesus said, "what you do to the least of these, you do to me."  Are we going to permit that?  Are we going to let evil be codified?

Shouting from the roof tops that good people are being injured is not going to be sufficient.  Evil always targets good people.  


Leave me alone. (4.00 / 3)
I, for one, hope the day will come when those of us in this community will no longer be threatened with the kind of terrorism that would make the Taliban proud each legislative season.

Why can't the Kevin Smiths of this state just move-on and leave us alone to live our lives in the same kind of peace and tranquility that he has? The sky didn't fall when Governor Lynch signed the bill into law, and it hasn't fallen since.  It's time for them to deal with real issues and the state has many of those to solve.

Leave me alone.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox