About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

NH GOP war on healthcare continues…

by: Mike Emm

Wed Feb 02, 2011 at 07:33:53 AM EST


NH is setting up a health insurance exchange for folks who cannot get private health insurance. Seems like a pretty good idea, no? Especially when the entire $600,000 cost for creating the program is being borne by the federal government. That's a win-win where I come from. Once the program is in place, Granite Staters who otherwise are uninsured can start to get access to healthcare with a program we created and we control.  

To get the ball rolling the Executive Council has to first accept federal money that will be used to set up the program. Not, god forbid, actually spend money to help people who are struggling. Just accept the money from Washington and set it up.  As the insurance commissioner said:

If this [$600K] contract is approved, it does not commit the state in any way to establish a state-based exchange. But it does permit us to minimize federal involvement in our health insurance market. It preserves New Hampshire's options, from my perspective.
Think local control, something NH voters have always been in favor of.

But the O'Brienistas heard the words "healthcare" and "federal" in the same sentence and went berserk.  They have been lobbying the all-GOP Executive Council to reject the money. Saint Bettencourt the Frugal said this:  

At a time when we are looking at historic budget deficits in Washington and Concord, we need to be more careful with taxpayers' money than to move forward on this contract.

And King O'Brien the Terrible added:
It would be frivolous to spend taxpayer dollars on implementing a law that could very well be thrown out.
So that settles it. Plan withdrawn.

Got that? $600 grand to help the poor get insurance. Frivolous. $75 grand to not look so damn foolish to Joe McQuaid? Priceless.

This is scorched-earth politics at its most destructive.

http://www.unionleader.com/art...

Mike Emm :: NH GOP war on healthcare continues…
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
We need to call/email the Executive Council NOW (0.00 / 0)
The Council needs to hear from supporters of the federal law. This is the opening round of a political fight.

whp

It's not health care. (0.00 / 0)
Healthy people don't need the kind of care at issue and no amount of care can keep people healthy.  There is no guarantee against infection, disease, injury and malfunction.

Calling it health care makes it easy to oppose.  It's easy to be against something that doesn't exist and wouldn't work, if it did.

Health insurers developed that verbiage when they set up a profit-oriented enterprise which relies on repeat custom and reduced production costs to keep profits increasing.  People are more likely to pay more for promises of health.  It's as simple as that.  They're even willing to stand some pain, if there a prospect of being more attractive, more vibrant, and more youthful feeling down the road.
Meanwhile, although there's been some minor success in keeping cancer patients alive longer and preventing deadly heart attacks, the over-all health of the American people has declined.  Is it because doctors were treating healthy people?  Probably not entirely.  But, training people to do face-lifts and tummy-tucks did not swell the ranks of primary care doctors, obstetricians, psychiatrists and neurosurgeons.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox