Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
So, this blogging thing ... I've been struggling with it lately. What purpose does it serve?
For example, should we engage in all-out message war with the likes of the Koch brothers? (Those guys make no bones about it -- they are at war with us. But does that, should that, mean we are at war with them?) If so, I have trouble accepting that. I thought the goal of all the electoral wars I fought in was peace.
Should we referee every comment made by every politician?
There are many different definitions of the purpose ("More and better Democrats") and many different approaches. Some state blogs are virtually captive arms of their state parties. Some blogs are barely read at all. Some are vibrant, but conveniently ignored by elected officials, because the participants will claw at each other, looking inward and not outward. It's ironic, I think, that politicians have learned to fear amateur camera operators in their face, but can pretty much disregard the writing of thousands of activists, voluntarily chronicling the actions of said officials on issues they care about.
I have a proposal. I don't expect it to be acted on immediately, but I want to put it out there.
What if a number of blogs, large and small, converged on one city at a time?
For example: Brockton. Brockton has over 90,000 people, and a lot of good things but a number of problems. The Enterprise is now a Gatehouse property and a shadow of its former self. The Globe and Herald pay little attention to Brockton. Can "citizen journalists" step in, at least for a while?
Massive collaboration would be the idea. Education blogger? Great, join us for Brockton Week and write about the system; use it as a lab for the programs you care about. Open meeting law advocate? Cover the planning board. Casino proponent/opponent? Surely Brockton's name has come up.
I studied journalism, at Keene State College in New Hampshire, in the mid-1980s. Our textbooks were full of dire warnings about the rise of corporate journalism, the then-creeping ideological bias ("objective journalism is a trend that is already ending," I read), and the shift away from newspapers. I was skeptical that any of this would happen, but all of it has, and far more severely than anyone predicted. Net result, a news gap. Suburban towns get covered well enough, but not mid-size cities.
And after Brockton, other cities. New Bedford. Lowell. Manchester. Worcester. Pittsfield.
Am I projecting? Yes, massively. If I could do it myself, I would. But one premise of blogging, I think, is that the crowd can amplify voices. We can stand up for Brockton. We can stand up for the things we really care about in politics.