About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

A modest proposal

by: Mike Emm

Thu Mar 10, 2011 at 06:30:18 AM EST


(Because "Facts" have a well known liberal bias... - promoted by Mike Hoefer)

The House GOP's 'big idea'  for the budget this term is to underestimate revenues, cut a whole range of taxes, reject federal aid, and at the same time maintain all funding support for the cities and towns and increase some costs with silly mean-spirited bills. They will square all this with cost cuts elsewhere and somehow end up with a balanced budget.

As Rep. Foose said in the Concord Monitor, with two weeks to go the majority party hasn't even presented their budget plan to the Finance Committee. And they can't, because the plan they want to propose doesn't add up. You can't lower revenue estimates, cut taxes, maintain local revenues, cut costs responsibly, and still be balanced. GOP leadership is trying to figure out how to cut enough programs to make up the shortfall in their revenues, but it's pretty clear what will work financially is politically unacceptable.

You can't fight math. Or can you?

Mike Emm :: A modest proposal
Here is my modest proposal for Boss O'Brien. I think it will work, because with his majority he can get pretty much anything through the House. Simply create a new committee. Call it, say, the Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee and model it after Dan Itse's crazy Constitutional Review & Statutory Recodification committee. Only, instead of repealing the definition of what is constitutional, repeal the laws of mathematics. Why shouldn't the state be able to redefine the way the commutative principle works if it can save some money? Why should a tax cut reduce revenues? Simply change the way subtraction works if it involves a tax cut, so: $10 - $2 tax cut = $12. Who's to say that 2 + 2 = 4? Some liberal? Why can't 2 +2 = 6 if this moves the GOP agenda forward?

I am sure with the right gung-ho spirit and a little creative pencil work, the Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee could easily discover a $650 million budget gap is non-existent. From what we've seen so far with this clown brigade,  there are plenty of 'highly qualified' state reps who would jump at the chance to be latter-day Isaac Newton's and rewrite the laws of mathematics in a more conservative-friendly manner.

And while they're at it, the Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee can clean up those pesky fiscal notes that say how much a particular bill will cost NH. Why should a bunch of guvmint bureaucrats get to say, for example, that drug testing food stamp recipients will cost $7 million a year and save 0? The Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee could report it will save us $25 million and cost only $1 million, saving the state $24 million a year. Magic! And after all, they're only numbers.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A modest proposal | 15 comments
Genius! (4.00 / 4)
How long do you think it will take to adopt this?  Fits right in with defunding education, because those damn nasty math teachers might create an insurgency: BRING BACK REAL MATH!  I can see the signs now.

Anthropologists have discovered an Amazonian tribe which (4.00 / 1)
uses no numbers and has no concept of history.  Their only reality is what someone they know has witnessed.
What I suspect is that the only thing unusual about these people is that there's an identifiable cluster of them and that, in fact, these mental proclivities are dispersed throughout the human population.  We just don't see them because we don't look for them and, to the extent they present as a deficit, we compensate for them with various social structures.  
For, example, it's not necessary to count the hours, if there's a church bell that wakes you and tells you when to eat, or an Imam that calls you to pray six times a day.  A sense of time is not a prerequisite to human existence.  Neither is a sense of direction.

[ Parent ]
Is it time? (0.00 / 0)
Is it time to begin recall elections here in NH as they are doing in WI?  How does that work in NH?

I might be mis-remembering, but (0.00 / 0)
I don't think we have a provision for recall. I'm sure Kathy knows....

"A national political campaign is better than the best circus ever heard of, with a mass baptism and a couple of hangings thrown in."  H.L Mencken.



[ Parent ]
Next Recall: 607 Days (4.00 / 5)
There is no recall provision.  The problem with a recall provision is that it can sometimes reduce our elected political leaders to mush.  They'll be careful not to show courage and leadership on controversial matters because if they "upset" a few people they'll face the cost and diversion of a recount election.  

When I introduced Civil Unions in 2007 and gay marriage in 2009, several Portsmouth far right-wingers said I should be recalled.  I'm sure if they circulated a petition at that time they would have found enough signatures.  I still would have introduced the bills, but what if that recall election had been held and I lost?  What would that tell others?  

There are provisions of censure and impeachment for due reason.  The next "recall" election is already scheduled:  Tuesday, November 6, 2012.  That's just 607 days to go.


[ Parent ]
GREAT PROPOSAL, MIKE! (4.00 / 1)
They should consider it.  

I'd bet that Archimedes, a Greek mathematician and philosopher often called the "Father of Mathematics" would love to have a discussion with the current NH House Republican "leadership" and their finance committee members. It would be great entertainment for him.

But, he lived about 2,200 years ago so probably isn't up to it right now.  Besides, he probably doesn't have either a long or short form birth certificate, so they'd discount him outright.  


Not that this is news (0.00 / 0)
I was having an interesting discussion with someone who is quite far to the right.  They were railing off the usual talking points and the discussion finally turned to the NH budget and I asked, "How does the Republican's budget plan stand up to the governor's?"

Their response was, "The governor's plan doesn't go far enough."  And I said, "Well, okay but what is the Republican's plan?"  After about 30 seconds of silence they said, "All I know is, the governor's plan doesn't go far enough."

Proof positive these people have NO clue as to what they're doing and have no plan, if their own constituents don't even know what is going on.

Now to the post, the sad part is, I think this has probably crossed more than one warped legislator's mind.  Their mantra is quite simple, if you can't make something work in the current constraints, you change the constraints.  "Ipso fatso" (thank you Archie Bunker) you have solved your problem.

"We start working to beat these guys right now." -Jed Bartlet


Ideologies Don't Care about the Truth (4.00 / 3)
While it is an interesting idea for the Republicans to develop an entirely new system of government to balance their budget, I don't see them doing that because they don't need to.

Mike's idea assumes that the Republicans care about creating a "real" budget.  I don't think that they do.  They will simply cut whatever programs necessary to balance the budget and blame the results on Governor Lynch and the Democratic Party.  When the revenues come in higher than projected, the Republicans will bring back popular programs and paint themselves as heroes.  These people are ideologies and don't care about truth.


In the real world (0.00 / 0)
In the real world the two sides would have both provided some form of scored budget to compare.

In NH Republicanland we have the governor's budget plan and a bunch of squawking from those in Repbulicanland saying it didn't go far enough.

I ask, "HOW DO YOU KNOW!?  You don't even have a plan outside of, 'we need to cut taxes, etc. etc.'"  And people used to call Democrats "sheeple."

"We start working to beat these guys right now." -Jed Bartlet


[ Parent ]
I think when (not if) revenues come in higher than projected... (0.00 / 0)

they will use the 'surplus' to pay for tax cuts that mostly go to businesses. The House has already passed  three bills tax cuts, the Ways and means committee has asked the House to approve another 6 cuts, and they have an additional 4 or 5 that have been retained for more work, including a couple that will repeal every fee or tax increase in the past 4 years.

[ Parent ]
Stop giving them ideas (0.00 / 0)
They could direct whatever entity actually reviews the budget for the legislature to assume that tax cuts generate revenue while reviewing the assumptions. It's much easier than actually finding revenue or dealing with the consequences of their actions. I'm honestly surprised this hasn't been tried already.

That's Paul Ryan's trick, (0.00 / 0)
making assumptions that have no relationship to reality. The famed Roadmap for America's Future, which is actually the roadmap to a third world nation right here.

[ Parent ]
A modest proposal | 15 comments

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox