Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
(Because "Facts" have a well known liberal bias... - promoted by Mike Hoefer)
The House GOP's 'big idea' for the budget this term is to underestimate revenues, cut a whole range of taxes, reject federal aid, and at the same time maintain all funding support for the cities and towns and increase some costs with silly mean-spirited bills. They will square all this with cost cuts elsewhere and somehow end up with a balanced budget.
As Rep. Foose said in the Concord Monitor, with two weeks to go the majority party hasn't even presented their budget plan to the Finance Committee. And they can't, because the plan they want to propose doesn't add up. You can't lower revenue estimates, cut taxes, maintain local revenues, cut costs responsibly, and still be balanced. GOP leadership is trying to figure out how to cut enough programs to make up the shortfall in their revenues, but it's pretty clear what will work financially is politically unacceptable.
Here is my modest proposal for Boss O'Brien. I think it will work, because with his majority he can get pretty much anything through the House. Simply create a new committee. Call it, say, the Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee and model it after Dan Itse's crazy Constitutional Review & Statutory Recodification committee. Only, instead of repealing the definition of what is constitutional, repeal the laws of mathematics. Why shouldn't the state be able to redefine the way the commutative principle works if it can save some money? Why should a tax cut reduce revenues? Simply change the way subtraction works if it involves a tax cut, so: $10 - $2 tax cut = $12. Who's to say that 2 + 2 = 4? Some liberal? Why can't 2 +2 = 6 if this moves the GOP agenda forward?
I am sure with the right gung-ho spirit and a little creative pencil work, the Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee could easily discover a $650 million budget gap is non-existent. From what we've seen so far with this clown brigade, there are plenty of 'highly qualified' state reps who would jump at the chance to be latter-day Isaac Newton's and rewrite the laws of mathematics in a more conservative-friendly manner.
And while they're at it, the Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee can clean up those pesky fiscal notes that say how much a particular bill will cost NH. Why should a bunch of guvmint bureaucrats get to say, for example, that drug testing food stamp recipients will cost $7 million a year and save 0? The Financial Review and Mathematical Readdification committee could report it will save us $25 million and cost only $1 million, saving the state $24 million a year. Magic! And after all, they're only numbers.