About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Voter Suppression House Vote Tomorrow

by: Kaili Lambe

Tue May 31, 2011 at 12:12:59 PM EDT


( - promoted by William Tucker)

Tomorrow, the House is expected to vote on a piece of legislation that could completely change the outcome of the 2012 election.

Here on BH we're all pretty familiar with the voter ID bill that O'Brien has made one of his top priorities to pass, but a lot of Granite Staters don't know the full impact or cost of this bill. We need to reach the Republicans who might not just vote on party lines before tomorrow's vote.

Democracy for America members will deliver a petition with comments on the photo ID bill to the Representatives who we can likely still persuade. Can you add your name today?

Kaili Lambe :: Voter Suppression House Vote Tomorrow
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a conservative organization funded in part by the Koch Brothers, has authored and advocated for photo ID bills in dozens of states this year, and I have no doubt that New Hampshire is one of the states where they have been working behind the scenes.

In state after state, Republicans argue that there is widespread voter fraud, while presenting little evidence of it. Depending on the population of each state, photo ID legislation will disenfranchise thousands, if not tens of thousands of eligible voters.

In NH we take pride in our local government, but ALEC is getting their way with this legislation and we need to put a stop to it. This bill will undermine the very foundation of our democracy. Please sign and share this petition to the NH House today so we can take a strong stand during the vote tomorrow.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Photo ID (0.00 / 0)
I wonder how the free staters and GOPers would react to a photo id firearms owners card?

With out the card you cannot own a fire arm!

The same thing as with out a photo id card you can not vote

I think there is almost no voter fraud----and no one dies from voter fraud------SEEMS TO ME WE NEED PHOTO ID FOR FIRE ARMS OWNERSHIP NOW!

But I suppose we would be labeled haters of the CONSTITUTION........just like them!


The bill "grandfathers" the Republican presidential primary. (4.00 / 2)
It doesn't take effect until Nov. 2012.

If there really is a problem, why is that acceptable?


It skips the Sept primary too (4.00 / 1)
Good point. I read the Oct implementation date as blatantly partisan. They make it easy for Republican voters in the presidential primary, and then they don't allow the Sept primary to be a dry run for town clerks so that on election day in Nov 2012 there are long lines and lots of confusion = decreased turn-out = bad for Democrats.

Political Campaign Manager at Democracy for America

[ Parent ]
NH League of Women Voters and America Votes sent this fiscal note for SB129 (4.00 / 4)
This was sent as an email message to legislators this evening:

Fiscal Notes for SB129

State Costs

Five year new costs for the state are $2,565,320 not including city and town costs or inflation and assuming 50% of voters without photo ID give up voting. (There are estimates of 75% in other states.)

2011 (FY2012) -- $19,000 for Secretary of State database and DMV reprogramming

Secretary of State waivers, provisional ballot supplies, voter photo IDs and election worker training and public education for:

2012 (FY2013) -- $842,040 for the General Election

2013 (FY 2014) -- $414,080 for city and town elections

2014 (FY2015) -- $876,120 for town elections, primary elections and the General Election

2015 (FY2016) -- $414,080 for city and town elections

The Secretary of State estimates:

$10,000 for a onetime expense to redesign the state's voter registration database to keep track of out-of-state driver license addresses

-$10,000 for each election to hold hearings on waiver requests for voters who do not have photo IDs (1,000 voters per election)

-$7,040 for ballot boxes, seals and envelopes for provisional ballots for each election

-50,000 to 75,000 voters will appear at the polls in primary and general elections without a photo ID that meets the requirements of SB129. This number will stay fairly constant because of the transient nature of the N.H. population.

The DMV testified it will cost $9,000 for a one-time expense for reprogramming for a voter photo ID and the cost of each voter photo ID will be $10.00 ($3.00 for materials and $7.00 for printing, mailing, labor and overhead costs.)

Even if only half the voters without a photo ID apply for a voucher, the costs for each statewide election will be from $250,000 to $325,000. City and town elections are difficult to determine but could reasonably be expected to run $60,000 to $80,000.

Limited hours and locations of DMV offices mean there will need to be weekend openings and expanded hours before and immediately after elections so no one is denied a voter photo ID.

New Boston is a perfect example of what happens when a state doesn't spend an adequate amount of time and money educating its election workers. Unlike many other states, N.H. offers only minimal training for election officials and no state training for ballot clerks and other election workers.

The state spends virtually nothing on public education about voting. With same-day registration and an intense campaign environment, the state has gotten by with leaving it to candidates and campaigns to explain N.H.'s rather straightforward current voting procedures.

States with less radical changes in voting procedures have found adding new information programs is very expensive. Georgia spends $841,000 a year on voter education. It took several tries for Georgia to pass the courts' requirements for public education by mailing voting information to every registered voter and potential voter, running prime time TV ads throughout the year and especially in advance of any election, developing and distributing materials to a wide variety of groups in the state to hand out, and by using all the new media resources to reach different audiences.

Because N.H., although smaller, will start from scratch, similar election worker and voter education will cost $300,000 to $500,000 a year for the first four or five years and only slightly less after that.

City and Town Costs

More than half of the N.H. Town Clerks don't have office hours on at least one of the two-and-a-half days allowed for voters to bring in a photo ID so the ballot can be counted. A person who can only vote because polls are opened before and after normal business hours also would need expanded Town Clerk hours. SB129 doesn't include funding for extra days and expanded hours for Town Clerks.

Town Clerks, Moderators and other election workers who don't work on Fridays will need to be paid for extra hours. It takes as many people to count and certify provisional ballots as regular ballots on Election Day because the legal requirements are the same.

SB129 also means candidates won't know the outcome of the election until just hours before the recount deadline. If there are challenges, the outcome could easily be delayed for weeks or months.

SB129 is based on Indiana's recently enacted photo ID bill. Indiana limits its polling places by law to no more than 1,200 registered voters. Of N.H.'s 330 polling places, 238 have between 1,200 and 5,000 registered voters, 44 have between 5,000 and 10,000 , and 9 have between 10,000 and 20,000.

The extra time needed for two ballot clerks to inspect a photo ID, write down any out-of-state addresses, help a voter fill out a provisional ballot affidavit and seal up the provisional ballot, and deal with questions about and objections to the new voting procedures will easily double the time it takes for Ballot Clerks to process all voters. This will mean doubling the number of election workers at almost every polling place in the state for almost every election.

Passing these costs onto cities and towns would be an unfunded mandate under Section 28.

Sources:

Secretary of State Bill Gardner and the Secretary's website, Joseph Williams of the NH Department of Motor Vehicles and the DMV website, U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Census, Testimony at the House Election Law Committee, the Senate Municipal and Public Affairs Committee and the House Finance Committee

General information from discussions with and review of publications prepared by:

Fair Elections Legal Network, Brennan Center for Justice, NYU School of Law, Demos.org, NAACP, Rock the Vote, Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights under the Law, People for the American Way, Project Vote, LWVUS, ACLU

Prepared by

Joan Flood Ashwell, Election Law Specialist, League of Women Voters N.H. 603-868-3775;

Melissa Bernardin, America Votes 603-225-1932

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.  (John Morley, 1838-1923)


Will these organizations (0.00 / 0)
Fair Elections Legal Network, Brennan Center for Justice, NYU School of Law, Demos.org, NAACP, Rock the Vote, Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights under the Law, People for the American Way, Project Vote, LWVUS, ACLU

challenge this if it passes and the governor does not veto it?


challenge (0.00 / 0)
The challenge has to come from a state organization - or an individual. Those are national organizations.

[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox