About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

We Cannot Cut Our Way Out of This

by: Jennifer Daler

Fri Aug 12, 2011 at 21:36:57 PM EDT


A recent article in the New York Times and an interview with billionaire Wilbur Ross  point to the fact that we cannot cut our way out of this economic crisis that began in earnest before the 2008 presidential election.

The Times article is titled: "GOP on Defensive as Analysts Question Party's Fiscal Policy." Among the analysts mentioned are Reagan adviser Martin Feldstein, and Henry Paulson, Treasury Secretary under George W Bush.  

Jennifer Daler :: We Cannot Cut Our Way Out of This
The article says that even before the deficit reduction plan was signed into law:

macroeconomists and private sector forecasters were warning that the direction in which the new House Republican majority had pushed the White House and Congress this year - for immediate spending cuts, no further stimulus measures and no tax increases, ever - was the wrong one for addressing the nation's two main ills, a weak economy now and projections of unsustainably high federal debt in coming years.

Instead of listening to the experts, Eric Cantor dug his heels in harder, and in a memo to House Republicans said

"Over the next several months, there will be tremendous pressure on Congress to prove that S.& P.'s analysis of the inability of the political parties to bridge our differences is wrong. In short, there will be pressure to compromise on tax increases," Mr. Cantor wrote. "We were not elected to raise taxes or take more money out of the pockets of hardworking families and business people."

The downgrading of the US's credit rating by Standard and Poor, whatever one thinks of the company, is in no small part based on the assumption that the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest will be allowed to continue beyond their 2012 expiration date.

Joel Prakken and Lawrence H Meyer of Macroeconomic Advisors  refer to "job-killing spending cuts", which we are experiencing here in New Hampshire as a result of the radical Republican budget. We're up to at least 1000 lost jobs in the health care sector alone.

Bolstering the idea that cutting taxes to the wealthy and to corporations will not create jobs, billionaire investor Wilbur Ross tells NPR's Steve Inskeep that businesses have gotten used to operating with less employees and are choosing to keep capital over labor.

Number one is we believe that unemployment is going to remain high. Virtually all companies we know of have learned to live with fewer employees per incremental dollar of sales than they ever had before. So we believe that part of the high unemployment is due, not just cyclical factors, but to structural change in the economy. And that's why corporate America is in much better shape than Mr. and Mrs. America.

It astonishes me how people such as Cantor and his ilk can continue to believe cutting the public sector is the way to recovery when the proof is, it isn't. Yes, things can always be made more efficient, etc, so on and so forth, but budgets do matter, as we are beginning to see in New Hampshire, where "job killing spending cuts" have only just begun,and whose effects have not yet come home to roost, but will.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
You've never heard of expansionary austerity? (4.00 / 1)
Me neither.

A few points to consider:

1.  We are in a severe, aggregate demand recession.  Job creators are consumers, not the wealthy.  When consumers demand products, businesses hire employees to provide the products.

2.  This is a problem that only the federal government can solve.  Guess who issues the US Dollar?  We do! This is different from states and local governments that have operational constraints to spending.  The first stimulus worked to reduce the initial impact of the recession but it was inadequate.  More is needed.

3.  Insolvency is not a problem when you are the issuer of the currency.  Stop worrying about debt, and start putting people back to work.  Work is good for social order.  People don't starve to death gracefully.

4.  Our current levels of un- and under-employment are much more dangerous than any potential for inflation at some distant point in the future.

5.  Our current levels of un- and under-employment are much more dangerous than any potential for currency devaluation at some distant point in the future.  By the way, for all the devaluation fear-mongers out there, the trade weighted US Dollar is up over the past three years.  Up.  During a time when federal spending is increased and the Fed balance sheet is increased 3X!

6.  NH was faced with tough choices, but it is remarkable that O'Brien and cabal have managed, at every turn, to make matters worse.  Now they tell us that they have just begun to screw things up.  So, we got that going for us, which is nice.  


In the immediate aftermath of Since the start of the financial crisis, the Fed/Treasury lent, spent, or guaranteed $28 $29 trillion to save the banking system.


Who cares? (0.00 / 0)
All true.  What's really, really weird about this cycle is that the folks steering the Republican party don't care about any of it.

Re 1.  The economic situation provided a rationale, however crazy, for extreme fiscal conservatism.  It's very clear that if they had to choose between shrunken government and healthy economy, shrunken government would win every time.

Re 3.  Insolvency is not a problem at all to Bachmann et al.

Re 4,5.  Unemployment is a poor people's problem - besides, a Rand-y man or woman need not worry about it, because they are so valuable.  Besides, it reduces labor costs, which is always a good thing.

Re 6.  Obviously, your/our "screw things up" is their "fix things up".  Smaller, dysfunctional government trumps larger, functional government every time - no matter who gets hurt.  Besides, if it's dysfunctional, it just proves how useless government is - right?


[ Parent ]
People need an alternative. (0.00 / 0)
And we're not providing one.  So far, policy recommendations from the very serious crowd continue the insane direction of the austerity intifada that is sweeping the globe.  When these VSP take to the pages of BH with the ruling syntax, we're doomed.  

But, in one sense, you're on to something really big.  If you want to understand the elite rationale for austerity, look no further than Greece, where a vulnerable and frightened population is ripe for exploitation.  The fire sale of national assets and public infrastructure follows the decades-old tactics established by the corporatocracy IMF to extract wealth from countries in crisis.  Of course, first they create the crisis, then they sweep in for the financial kill.  

I would just add that shrunken government is only prevalent in their ideology when conservatives are not in power.  When they have the power to direct the national treasure, they expand the government, just not in the direction that you, I, and others who think like us would prefer and that benefit the common person.

By agreeing to present options within the confines of the debate - anything outside the mainstream conventional wisdom is marginalized - our politicians and leaders continue to narrow the range of acceptable alternatives.  

In the immediate aftermath of Since the start of the financial crisis, the Fed/Treasury lent, spent, or guaranteed $28 $29 trillion to save the banking system.


[ Parent ]
Speaker O'Brien claims: (0.00 / 0)
CONCORD - House Speaker William O'Brien said Thursday that thousands of jobs have been created since Republican regained control of the Legislature.

"The facts about New Hampshire's economic recovery are clear. Since Election Day last year, 3,700 more residents have found jobs and our unemployment rate has dropped by 14 percent, according to the U.S. Department of Labor," O'Brien said. "We now have among the lowest percentage of unemployed in the nation, but we still have more work to do."

http://www.unionleader.com/art...

Is this true or is this more winger fantasy dreams?  What policies that Boss O'Brien and his henchmen have instituted created all these jobs?  


The employment (4.00 / 3)
numbers they are taking credit for, if they are as they say they are, were a function of Democratic policies, not Republican. the new budget took effect July 1 and we are barely halfway into August.

The effects on employment of the GOP policies, as I said in the diary are not known. All we know is the loss of jobs in the health care sector and jobs at the state and county level. If new companies employing thousands of people  have moved into the state in the last six weeks, it's news to me.  


[ Parent ]
We got this same (4.00 / 1)
nonsense from our state senator, Mr. Andy Sanborn, awhile ago, trying to take credit for job creation.  My partner, however, who works for Employment Security, advised Mr. S. that he was full of you know what, and that any improvement in the job situation was the result of those policies of the Democrats, not the wingers.  Never heard back from the good senator.  This is apparently another winger pipe dream and if they say if often enough they think people will think it's true.

[ Parent ]
I hesitate to post something this long (4.00 / 1)
but here is may last "Straight Talk" column, published last week in the Villager and the Ledger/Transcript:

When June's unemployment rates were announced several weeks ago, NH House Speaker William O'Brien wrote a Concord Monitor OpEd piece claiming credit for the state's declining unemployment rate.  The policies and budget put in place under HIS watch have spurred job growth, he said, and more jobs will be coming, just wait.

With all due respect to my honored colleague from across the aisle, I think it is a bit presumptuous of him to take credit for June's economic figures.  The O'Brien budget, and the O'Brien policies, did not go into effect until July 1, when the new fiscal year began.  Until then, we were still working under the policies and budget enacted under former House Speaker Terie Norelli.   Indeed, according to state labor statistics, the state's jobless rate and number of unemployed workers has dropped steadily since January, 2010, when Democrats still held control, and a full year before Speaker O'Brien took leadership.  

Fair is fair.  A truer test of the current leadership will be the unemployment figures for July, August, and September, when the new budget has been in effect for a few months.  

What we DO know at this time is that drastic cuts made in the new budget are resulting in job losses around the state.   I'm still collecting figures, but here are a few for you to ponder now.  The 45% cut in funding to the University of New Hampshire has resulted in 200 jobs cut. Two to three hundred state and government employees will be losing their jobs.   The Center for Non-Profits estimates more than 1000 jobs may be lost due to non-renewal of contracts.  The $250 million reduction in aid to hospitals has forced cuts of 456 jobs at three locations, and more are yet to come.  Pike Industries reports road construction jobs lost to be at least 100.  The court system has cut 73 jobs.  

And then there are the counties.  County budgets are set by the County Delegation, made up of state representatives.  Hillsborough County alone has lost 50 jobs, and I'm sure other counties are not far behind.  

In my email box this morning was the latest edition of "Granite State Rumblings", a newsletter from Every Child Matters, a children's advocacy group.  MaryLou Beaver, the director, presents some statistics neither party, or any citizen of New Hampshire, should be proud to own.  I quote:

"Here are the most current statistics available on New Hampshire children. And the important thing to keep in mind is that many of these statistics were gathered before cuts to programs were enacted. We expect to see increases in all areas as State cuts start taking effect.
• 30,602 NH children live in poverty.
• 12,744 live in extreme poverty.
• 9,383 receive TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) as of June 30, 2011.
• 46,719 rely on food stamps as of June 30, 2011.
• 34,120 receive free and reduced price lunches at school.
• 15,000 do not have health insurance.
• 96,035 were enrolled in Medicaid at any time during State Fiscal Year 2010.  (Approximately 20% of all NH children are covered by Medicaid).
• 21.3% of 2 year olds are not fully immunized.
In New Hampshire, we have seen the number of children living in poverty increase by a whopping 70+ percent in the past ten years. If we don't change the course of events, growing up in the granite state might mean something quite different for future generations than it did for us."

Things may not be a rosy as Speaker O'Brien would have us believe.  But I sure do hope he is right, and that his policies will bring lots of new jobs to New Hampshire.  At least 2100 more adults will be stopping at the unemployment office looking for work, and many more children will be hoping they find it.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.  (John Morley, 1838-1923)


Should have said "my last..." (0.00 / 0)


You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.  (John Morley, 1838-1923)

[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox