About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
- Jackie Cilley
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

House Republicans Dishonor the NH Constitution

by: Dean Barker

Wed Jan 18, 2012 at 16:10:54 PM EST


So today the Republican supermajority House voted to enshrine the prohibition of raising revenue through income into New Hampshire's state constitution.

I have a bridge I'd like to sell to anyone who doesn't think this is an obvious, partisan, Get-Out-The-Vote move.

"You mean if I go out and vote for it and vote for the folks who put it there I won't get taxed?" is what Bill O'Brien's gang presumes the average voter will think. (He's wrong, of course; voters aren't as dumb as he thinks they are. They aren't dumb at all.)

The other trick will be to lie and claim that the sensible people who voted against this support taxing your income. I'm guessing it'll be a mailer, or a robo-call, or both.

Leave that aside for a moment, step back and look at the bigger picture.

House Republicans, led by Bill O'Brien and D.J. Bettencourt, have so little respect for our state's constitution that they would forever change it, and would forever bind New Hampshire's options for sustaining herself in the future, for the sake of winning some votes next November.

This is a shameful, dishonorable act.

(find me > 140 on birch paper; on Twitter < 140)

Dean Barker :: House Republicans Dishonor the NH Constitution
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

21st Century Revenue (0.00 / 0)
In 2012, the only fair tax is the one based on one's ability to pay.  One's ability to pay is based on one's income.  Therefore, an income tax is the only fair tax to collect to pay for the services that the state provides.  Simple.

Support an income tax or not, (4.00 / 5)
what they did today was reprehensible, treating the our Constitution as a GOTV prop.

Social Media Director for Jackie Cilley for Governor. Follow her on Twitter & Facebook!

[ Parent ]
Bad vote (4.00 / 2)
I am seriously opposed to an income tax for reasons that don't need to be reiterated here. However, I agree with the Republican rep who said tax policy should not be enshrined in the Constitution.

The Constitution is a statement of principles and rights, and the architecture of our form of government. O'Brien and Bettencourt are using a document that our forefathers fought a revolution for petty political gain.  

 



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


Precedent: (0.00 / 0)
Just look at the amendment passed in the 1930s that prevents revenue from the gas tax from being used on public transit--whether buses or trains--that would alleviate traffic and road wear. Enshrining legislative policies in the constitution is both foolish and disrespectful to the document and future citizens.

[ Parent ]
I didn't think Manchester would pass a tax cap, either - but here we are. (4.00 / 1)
Are you really that confident that this won't pass in the general election?  I'm not.

Not to worry, it's merely a guideline... (4.00 / 1)
During the Redistricting debate, the great constitutional scholar Rep. David Bates (speaking on behalf of the House leadership) reminded us that Part 2nd Article 11 is just a guideline.  (That is the provision which ostensibly guaranteed each town or ward its own state reps if it had sufficient population.)  If CACR 13 is passed, Part 2nd, article 5-c would likewise (by Rep. Bates's logic) be merely a guideline.  It would just mean that the legislature should look to other taxes first before imposing any new taxes on personal income.  


sitting state rep: running for re-election in 2012.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox