About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
- Jackie Cilley
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

They Do What They Say Others Do

by: Jennifer Daler

Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 08:50:26 AM EST


It has not escaped my or probably anyone else's notice that Republicans are very good at accusing other people of doing what they themselves do. Why just the other day during the debate on redistricting, Rep. David Bates (R-Windham), chair of the Election Law Committee and Vice Chair of the Special Committee on Redistricting, lambasted the Democratic redistricting plan by saying it was created by America Votes, an out of state organization run out of Washington, DC. Never mind that this plan is the one that most closely follows both the US and NH Constitutions.

David Bates was the behind the epic fail of the town meeting warrant items to end marriage equality. And who supported that initiative as well as the campaigns of R state reps?

Jennifer Daler :: They Do What They Say Others Do
The National Organization for Marriage. Their newest initiative is to pour money into NH state campaigns to overturn marriage equality. From their website:

We intend to hold every legislator accountable for his or her vote on marriage. Those who support HB 437 will be rewarded, while those who don't will suffer the consequences."
Brian Brown, NOM's President

Suffer the consequences? Who are they to hold NH state reps accountable when they have nothing to do with New Hampshire? They are not our constituents, but sad little people who have nothing better to do that to take other people's rights away and foment bigotry. The vast majority of NH citizens do not want this law changed.

NOM's address?

2029 K Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

If that weren't enough, they say in their press release that they will spend $250,000 on state level races to "reward" state reps who vote to repeal.

And the truth comes out about the red tide of 2010 and the "mandate" the present House majority has to make radical changes to NH (bold mine):

In 2010 NOM was a significant player in New Hampshire and spent over $1 million in the last election. It's humorous that our opponents loudly proclaim they will raise $100,000 to help legislators on their side when we have already invested over ten times that amount," said Brown. "Aside from helping defeat Bill Binnie, we worked with grassroots organizations to help flip the state legislature after liberal democrats legalized same-sex marriage in 2009. NOM sent mailers and launched phone calls in 119 house races, and our endorsed candidates won all of them. A vote for HB 437 is a vote for traditional marriage. We will consider a vote against the legislation a vote for same-sex marriage, and we will hold legislators accountable. NOM will support those who support marriage and will work with local New Hampshire organizations to recruit pro-traditional marriage candidates to run against those who vote against HB 437 and fund them."

But there's more. Willard "Mitt" Romney, from Massachusetts via the Cayman Islands, put tons of cash into 2010 Republican state level races as well.

Campaign aides estimated that Romney and his political action committees poured more than $100,000 into a variety of local campaigns and helped raise hundreds of thousands of dollars more.

"Romney was the man behind the curtain, financially,'' said Pat Griffin, a New Hampshire Republican consultant who briefly worked with Romney's 2008 campaign.

It's crystal clear that to find out what NH Republican leadership  is doing, thinking, etc., just listen to their accusations against others.  

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Excellent post Jen. (4.00 / 1)
I've also noticed, when called on a particularly egregious bending or changing of rules, or inconsistent rulings about what will be allowed done or said on the floor, the Speaker uses the "It was done to me so I will do it to you" excuse.  I have been told by many long-serving reps that this is simply not true.  However, even if true, it does not make it right.

Even my preschoolers have learned if you don't like it done to you, don't do it to someone else.  

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.  (John Morley, 1838-1923)


Instinct-driven people are imitative. (0.00 / 0)
"Imitation" may be "the sincerest form of flattery," but people who have no self-awareness and misinterpret what others do, can't be accurate in their imitation.  So, it all boils down to a figment of the imagination--not to be argued with, just stopped.

[ Parent ]
Perhaps (0.00 / 0)
we should all send Mr. O'Brien copies of All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.  

[ Parent ]
Looks like (0.00 / 0)
we have some interesting results from "following the money" here.

Not a Pretty Picture: American Independent Looks at NOM's Political Spending (0.00 / 0)
HRC's assistant general counsel Darrin Hurwitz speculated to American Independent's Sofia Resnick on NOM's lacking grassroots support, as evidenced by their shady financial records.

Hurwitz told the American Independent:

   [I]t perhaps comes as a surprise that NOM - a $9 million organization that boasts of its electoral muscle and that relocated its headquarters to Washington two years ago - doesn't have a federal PAC and has never had one. Or that in four years NOM has never contributed one cent to a federal candidate. Indeed, it's highly unusual for an advocacy organization of NOM's size - especially one that prides itself on its electoral work - not to have a PAC. Why would an organization with an expressed interest in federal issues like the Defense of Marriage Act not support federal candidates? [...]

       Advocacy organization PACs raise their funds from a broad base of supporters whose individual contributions are capped by law at $5,000 per year. These donors are publicly disclosed on reports filed with the Federal Election Commission. NOM doesn't have enough members to raise funds for an effective PAC, and just as importantly it doesn't believe in the transparency that PACs must show.

TAI has pointed out that, in 2010, NOM reported raising only 8 percent of its revenue from single donations below $5,000. Two-thirds of the money NOM reported raising from donors - more than $6 million - came from just two sources. The previous year, NOM's contributions above $5,000 made up about 78 percent of all the contributions received, according to the group's own financial reporting. And yet, Brown is still insisting that NOM comprises millions of supporters.

http://www.americanindependent...

Wouldn't it be interesting to know who the two donors who contributed $6 million were?  


Silly lies (4.00 / 2)
I love it when Brian Brown somehow implies that the results of national wave election have anything to do with NOM. Does he realize that this is the second least-religious state in the country?

For that matter, practically all of NOM's 2010 spending in NH went to defeat John Lynch -- who was "punished" by the electorate with re-election and continued sky-high approval ratings.

Whoops.

Finally, how does NOM explain away 62 or 63 percent support for the same-sex marriage law in NH? Have the "gay billionaires" bought off the vast majority of the public?


LOL about the "gay billionaires". (0.00 / 0)
Found out about them when some kids in my class showed me the ad on the side of Urban Dictionary. Hilarity ensued.  

[ Parent ]
Irony (4.00 / 1)
Irony: Being named the National Organization for Marriage, yet being against marriage.

Rep. Bates uses the 'out of state organization' argument simply because he has no logical argument against the Democratic plan.

So, when's the GOP plan going to the courts???

Running for State Rep 2012 in Hillsborough District 2
Aaron Gill, Deering: nhgill.com Twitter: Gill4NHStateRep



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox