About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Ballz to the Wall for Equality

by: Nicholas Gunn

Thu Dec 28, 2006 at 12:45:11 PM EST


I continue to be amazed and thankful to the Concord Monitor for their efforts to press the issue of civil unions into the foreground of NH Politics.  By taking a stand as a newspaper, commissioning a poll, and demanding our elected officials take a public stand they are making it much easier for our new Democratic Majorities to take action on this issue in the new legislative session.

Today is no exception.  The Monitor found Governor Lynch's proposal for yet another commission to `study' the issue of equality unacceptable.  The published a staff editorial which I will post in its entirety.  (If this is a problem, I will cut it)

No more study, please

The 2007 Legislature will see at least two bills to make civil unions legal for same-sex couples. In response, Gov. John Lynch has suggested, through a spokesman, that he may deploy one of the most potent weapons ever designed to kill time, a committee. He should not make good on that threat.

It's true the legislative commission former governor Craig Benson appointed to study the implications of legalizing same-sex marriage was fatally compromised by the lack of objectivity of many of its members. The group's tempestuous meetings and bigoted conclusions embarrassed the state. But no matter how fairly constituted the next group could be, its contribution to the debate would be insignificant compared with the real-world experiences of neighboring states. Vermont made civil unions legal in 2000, and Massachusetts recognized same-sex marriage in 2004.

The governor opposes gay marriage but, without making his position on civil unions clear, has voiced support for equal rights for all citizens. Creating a committee to study the issue would simply allow him to maintain that vague stance indefinitely.

Support for civil unions has increased. According to the latest poll taken for the Monitor, 44 percent of New Hampshire residents favor civil unions, 40 percent oppose them and 16 percent are undecided.

The governor could take the lead on this issue and make his position clear, or he could wait to see whether a bill lands on his desk. The former course would be preferable, the latter understandable. But as for another study commission, to paraphrase the late, great singer James Brown, "Please, please, please don't . . ."

When New Hampshire becomes the second state in the country to institute civil unions for gays and lesbians through legislative action, It will be in no small part due to the efforts of the Concord Monitor.

Nicholas Gunn :: Ballz to the Wall for Equality
Poll
When will NH pass Civil Unions Legislation?
This Year
Next Year
Far in the Future

Results

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thank You, Concord Monitor (0.00 / 0)
I hope to be posting yet another diary later today. 

I hope it doesn't offend Meta Jesus.


Mulitple postings are great (4.00 / 2)
As long as their original in topic or coverage, which yours are.

Thanks for covering this particular issue. It helps that someone is keeping an eye on it.

Incidentally, I wandered over to the wikipedia on civil unions/gay marriage the other day, and found the whole history fascinating. Meaning, I've lived through the blow by blow coverage of this, but stepping back and looking at the timeline gave me a sense of it.

I'm going to try to get Jim Splaine over here to discuss his proposal.



[ Parent ]
I have seen up close and personal (4.00 / 1)
in my non-blog life how committees are formed precisely to keep people busy on issues they care about, and which leadership has no intention whatsoever of addressing.

The blue-ribbon panel: a classic delaying strategy. Whether Lynch intends it to be or not, I have no way of knowing.

Except I don't even know what the point of one would be for civil unions.  How many months of meetings are needed to answer the yes-no question, "Do we believe in equality under the law?"


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox