About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Smart people

by: bloomingpol

Tue Aug 28, 2007 at 07:27:43 AM EDT


I wrote this piece for our local on line citizen journalism paper The Forum and thought I would post it here as well.  After going to the Rockingham County Democrats picnic on Sunday, I was thinking about what I look for in a candidate.  I have previously written that I look for a leader on progressive values, but I decided I needed something else as well, well-trained intelligence.
bloomingpol :: Smart people
I must admit, when it comes to my government, I have a prejudice toward smart people.  I feel much more secure knowing that decisions are made based on finding facts and considering the real world, followed by the use of reason and logic to discover solutions.  Starting from the result one wants to see and working backwards, spinning the facts to fit the ideology, and advocating that the end justifies the means scares me a lot! 
I had the pleasure of seeing and hearing a couple of gentlemen who are really smart guys the other day at the Rockingham County Democrats? picnic in Hampton Falls.  Jay Buckey, MD, former astronaut, professor of medicine at Dartmouth, and candidate for US Senate, a physician and scientist, as well as having served in the Air Force Reserve, talked about how we should move forward as a nation to deal with the issues of alternative energy (so we won?t be dependent on the Middle East for oil) and climate change, and how the perversion of science in the current administration puts our nation?s security in peril. 
And I loved his line about political experience:  (paraphrasing) ?Yes, I have to agree that John Sununu has very little real world experience!? 
Then John Edwards stopped by, all too briefly, and said something that caught my ear.  In passing, discussing the economy, he noted that it might be ?wonkish,? but he had as an economic advisor Joseph Stiglitz, and that given the choice between balancing the budget first, or fixing what he called the ?structural problems? with the economy (meaning our healthcare problems, the erosion of the middle class, the increase in poverty, and the stagnation of real growth [despite the Republican spin that if the rich get richer all of us benefit]), he would chose to fix the problems first because that would lead to economic growth and a decrease in the deficit. 
Now, I read some economics now and then.  I am particularly interested in those thinkers who manage to go beyond so-called ?classical? economics, where the market solves all ills.  I like to read those who look at the real world and see that markets are not perfect, because people do not have all the facts to make market decisions, and because people are not always perfectly rational beings even when they have all the facts.  Stiglitz is one of those, and if John Edwards is listening to him, I will definitely listen to John.
I was also pleased that John is calling for getting rid of ALL nuclear weapons on the planet.  Given the climate crisis we face, which threatens all of us with enormous changes in resources and lifestyle, health and actual survival, spending time and money on weapons to wipe out life on entire continents strikes me as an awful waste.  Now that we are learning the price of ?preventative war? perhaps we can decide that war is a waste of people and resources and there are better ways to solve conflicts. 
Smart people give me hope for a future for me and my children and grandchildren, and my lovely planet without which I cannot survive.  I know that the political process does not have to be a zero sum game, where if I win, you lose.  We can all win if we elect smart people to run the show.
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Smart people | 9 comments
Nice. (0.00 / 0)
I thought you were going to comment on the smart people who asked the smart questions, but you're right that the answers were smart.
Now, if we can just persuade Republicans that smart thinking is more important than just being "smart."

No role (0.00 / 0)
for a nuclear deterrent in the post Cold War? We've done a pretty good job averting a great power war since the development of the atom bomb. I'm not too sure about 100% worldwide nuclear disarmament or how the government could approach it. Seems unrealistic to me.

I liked your write-up, though. I prefer pragmatism and intelligence to obedience and ideology any day.


Glad you asked. (0.00 / 0)

The establishment of nuclear-weapon-free zones (NWFZs) contributes to controlling the spread of weapons of mass destruction and is an important step towards a nuclear-weapon-free world. To date, treaties establishing NWFZs exist: the Treaty of Tlatelolco (Latin America and the Caribbean NWFZ), the Treaty of Rarotonga (South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone), the Treaty of Bangkok (Southeast Asia NWFZ), and the Treaty of Pelindaba (African NWFZ). Of these four treaties, the Pelindaba Treaty has not yet entered into force. In addition to these NWFZ treaties, other agreements, including the Antarctic Treaty, the Outer Space Treaty, the Moon Agreement, and the Seabed Treaty denuclearize and demilitarize specific areas of the globe, as well as outer space. (Mongolia also declares itself, and is internationally recognized, as a single-state nuclear-weapon-free zone. )

Update: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan signed a treaty establishing a Central Asian Nuclear Weapon Free Zone on September 8, 2006.


*********************************************
Presumably such treaties would include an inspection regime
("trust but verify")
The CANWFZ was endorsed by China and Russia and Egypt has already agreed to join, were the area to be extended down the Arabian Peninsula.
Senator Dodd claimed not to have heard of the CANWFZ.  One suspects that the Bush Administration did not inform the Senate that it had been blocking this treaty at the U.N. with the claim that the participants would prohibit the transit of nuclear weapons on American planes through their air space.

[ Parent ]
Effectively a counterproliferation effort (0.00 / 0)
Not the elimination of the all nuclear weapons.

USA, China, France, UK, Russia, India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea would take a lot of persuasion to give them up entirely. Even if they did, I don't think humanity would necessarily be better served. We obviously had some close calls during the Cold War (Cuba, Able Archer), but nothing as horrible as the transcontinental great power wars of World War I and World War II has occurred since the development of nuclear weapons (and the establishment of the UN system).


[ Parent ]
M.A.D. (0.00 / 0)
The accumulation of nuclear weapons was once thought to be the answer to keeping the Cold War from turning hot. Now such behavior is considered the purview of rogue nations.

Nuclear weapons, it seems to me, serve no purpose in the actual defense of a modern industrialized nation. And what if a rogue nation were to use a nuclear device? Do we answer with a bigger nuclear device? Isn't the the definition of "mutually assured destruction" that was supposed to be the great deterring factor?

Not as smart as I think I am, but not as dumb as I look.


[ Parent ]
M.A.D. (0.00 / 0)
is nuclear power on nuclear power. Having a nuclear deterrent also keeps non-nuclear powers from attacking nuclear powers. In the age of airplanes, ICBMs, and space technology, the Atlantic and Pacific ocean offer no certain security guarantee for the United States. Nuclear weapons are used in an almost exclusively defensive role.

[ Parent ]
The Threat, The Politics, The ACTION (0.00 / 0)
Stopping Nuclear Terrorism

The greatest threat our nation faces is a nuclear weapon falling into terrorists' hands. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed 650 cases of illicit trafficking in nuclear and radiological materials worldwide between 1993 and 2004. As little as four kilograms of plutonium - about the size of a soda can - can potentially be enough for a fissile nuclear bomb.

Senator Obama passed legislation with Senator Lugar to prevent weapons of mass destruction from being smuggled across the globe. Signed into law in January 2007, the Lugar-Obama initiative will help other nations detect and secure weapons of mass destruction before they ever leave their borders. Senator Obama also worked with Senator Lugar to successfully restore $8 million in budget cuts to the original Nunn-Lugar Initiative.

Cooperative Proliferation Detection, Interdiction Assistance, and Conventional Threat Reduction Act of 2005 (Introduced in Senate)

What rising Democratic star Barack Obama can learn from an old lion of the GOP.


The two men grew closer in August of 2005, when Obama joined Lugar on a tour of Russia and Eastern Europe to inspect weapons facilities, a trip that Lugar makes annually. For the younger senator, it was a chance to see first-hand the situation that had long unsettled the older statesman. In Kiev, they visited a pathogen laboratory, an unsecured nondescript downtown building, where the senators were shown a storage unit resembling a mini-refrigerator that contained vast rows of test tubes. Some tubes held anthrax; others, the plague. As Obama has recounted the story, "At this point I turned around and said 'Hey, where's Lugar? Doesn't he want to see this?'" But the older senator was standing in the back of the room, nonchalantly. "Been there, done that," Lugar said.


SGS is Jack Mitchell of Lowell, MA. The symbolism of the "sleeping giant" is based on my HOPE for America.

[ Parent ]
I don't if you're familiar with it (4.00 / 1)
but you might be interested in Last Best Chance, a fictional film by the Nuclear Threat Initiative. It's kind of about what you're talking about. For extra kicks, Fred Thompson's in it.

I thought you could watch it online (maybe you can and I just couldn't figure it out), but apparently you can get a free DVD.


[ Parent ]
Endorsed by Republican Senator Richard Lugar (0.00 / 0)
The film that is! ;p

Thank you very much for the tip.

SGS is Jack Mitchell of Lowell, MA. The symbolism of the "sleeping giant" is based on my HOPE for America.


[ Parent ]
Smart people | 9 comments

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox