This is priceless:
Mr. Schumer said his decision had been "extremely difficult," and that a big factor was Mr. Mukasey's opinion, conveyed to him this afternoon, that "were Congress to pass a law banning certain interrogation techniques, we would clearly be acting within our constitutional authority."
Wonderful. Chucky was reassured when Mukasey in a stunning statement revealed to him it would be OK for Congress to pass a law.
I was unaware that this was a confirmation for a Supreme Court Justice. Chucky knows better, though.
And incidentally, Mukasey states very clearly there that he believes current law does not prohibit waterboarding.
Which is great, because that means that in addition to providing retroactive immunity to wiretappers, Chucky can now provide retroactive immunity to torturers, by providing a bill that basically affirms the insane assertion of this administration that there is no precedent that prohibits torture.
This man is an idiot and a disgrace.
Now, on to Elwood. Elwood has asked to step down as a front-pager, because he feels he has left behind the a main premise of this site, that we can build a robust and moral Democratic party and bring it to victory. It's not the victory that worrying him -- it's the inability of the party to take action on positions where there should be moral clarity.
So we're going to let him step down, and rage in the side diaries, where I imagine he'll find much support for his premise that we may have to start from scratch.
And he'll surely find a lot of sympathy for me. I'm not sure how long a party can be useful when people like Chucky have decided to inhabit an alternate moral universe.
I'll add that in our backchannel email, all of us managers of this site are united in our disgust at what has happened in the past couple of weeks: first with the telecom immunity provisions, and then with the stunning assertion that having an Attorney General that thinks it might be OK to start to drown people is acceptable.
We're debating putting more national stuff on the front page (instead of only New Hampshire coverage). That is: if it is original, and if it is directed at applying real pain to to the Schumers and DiFi's of the world. It's a thought. But I thought I am havig more and more frequently. Let me know what you all think.
|