About
A progressive online community for the Granite State. More...
Getting Started
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


The Masthead
Managing Editors

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
NH Progressive Blogs
Betsy Devine
Citizen Keene
Democracy for NH
Equality Press
The Political Climate
Granite State Progress
Chaz Proulx
Susan the Bruce

NH Political Links
Graniteprof
Granite Status
Kevin Landrigan
NH Political Capital
Political Chowder (TV)
Political Chowder (AM)
PolitickerNH
Pollster (NH-Sen)
Portside with Burt Cohen
Bill Siroty
Swing State 2008

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Carol Shea-Porter
Paul Hodes
Jeanne Shaheen
Barack Obama (NH)

ActBlue Hampshire
Stop Sununu
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Bob Geiger
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

RSS Feed

Blue Hampshire RSS


The War Bet Is Placed

by: JimC

Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 23:52:51 PM EST


I am writing this without having read the debate open thread, so I may overlap some of what was said there.

Tweety went overboard in describing Hillary's "power play," but he was essentially correct about the significance of the moment. The three leading candidates have the same position on the war: withdrawal within a year of taking office, with some sort of contingency force either in Iraq or nearby (Kuwait).

Hillary initiated it, but it was Barack who said got Edwards to agree it was a "distinction without a difference." In short, you're coming too, you will not run to my left on the war.

This discussion could evolve, but this is the equilibrium we've reached. I'm more or less prepared to accept it, because, despite what I said in September ("cut funding"), to be nakedly political about it, these candidates have talked to voters for months. This is apparently what they've heard: End the war, but maintain stability.

This, or McCain's 100 years. A big diference. A big enough distinction for the independent voter, after all the qualifications, contingencies, and unforeseen circumstances are considered and discussed? I sure as hell hope so.

JimC :: The War Bet Is Placed
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The War Bet Is Placed | 4 comments
Yes, the stage is set. (0.00 / 0)
Obama will definitely use his anti-war 2002 position during the primary battle as much as he can, but in essence, for the general, that's the crux.

I look forward to typing "100 years" over and over and over from now until November.

Wonder if Sununu's fired now.


point of difference (0.00 / 0)
see this at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22...

Edwards seizes an opening
snip
"I think there are real differences here, and they're not subtle," Edwards said, vowing to "have all combat troops out in the first year that I'm president of the United States."

"I will end combat missions," he said. "And while I'm president, there will be no permanent military bases in Iraq."

 

This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force.

   Dorothy Parker


[ Parent ]
Transcript (0.00 / 0)
Link (pdf): http://www.2008electionprocon....

OBAMA: I just want to pick up on what John said, because we've had this discussion before. John, are you saying that you're -- I don't know if I'm using my question here, but...

WILLIAMS: I think you are.

(snip)

OBAMA: Look, I think it's important to understand that either you are willing to say that you may go after terrorist bases inside of Iraq if they should form, in which case there would potentially be a combat aspect to that, obviously, or you're not.

OBAMA: And, you know, if you're not, then that could present some problems in terms of the long-term safety and security of the United States of America. So I just wanted to make sure that we got that clarification.

EDWARDS: Is that a question?

WILLIAMS: Yes, I think we've ruled it a question.

EDWARDS: My answer to that is, as long as you keep combat troops in Iraq, you continue the occupation. If you keep military bases in Iraq, you're continuing the occupation. The occupation must end. As respects Al Qaida, public enemy number one, they're responsible for about 10 percent
of the violence inside Iraq according to the reports. I would keep a quick reaction force in Kuwait in case it became necessary, but that is different, Barack, than keeping troops stationed inside.

OBAMA: John...

EDWARDS: Excuse -- let me finish, please.

OBAMA: I'm sorry.

EDWARDS: That is different than keeping troops stationed inside Iraq, because keeping troops stationed inside Iraq -- combat troops -- and continuing combat missions, whether it's against Al Qaida or anyone else, at least from my perspective, is a continuation of the occupation. And I think a continuation of the occupation continues the problem, not just in reality, but in perception that America's occupying the country.

OBAMA: Let me suggest, I think there's a distinction without a difference here. If it is appropriate for us to keep that strike force outside of Iraq, then that obviously would be preferable.

The point is, at some point you might have that capacity, and that's the -- that's the clarification I want to make sure...

WILLIAMS: Having come close to settling that, we're going to take another one of our breaks.

A quick reaction force in Kuwait -- a really narrow difference. I'm not trying to knock Edwards, just point out how close the positions are.


[ Parent ]
close but no cigar n/t (0.00 / 0)
In this format it was clear that Edwards was not spouting current U.S. policy, nor was he afraid to express that distinction. There is a definite difference and distinction between maintaining bases in Iraq, and not doing so.
Earlier this year, when it seemed likely that diplomacy would not avert Bush and Cheney's desire to take out the Revolutionary Guard positions inside Iran, Kuwait convened a meeting with MP's. We have a had a presence there since driving out Saddam in Desert Storm. Having troops stationed in a 'friendly' nation who had been invaded and freed with U.S. assistance, is not the same as an Occupation Force. Readiness and Occupation, are two different animals in my non-military mind.

http://www.spacewar.com/report...


Kuwait served as the launch-pad for that invasion and remains the main staging point for US-led troops in Iraq. Around 15,000 US troops are stationed at several bases in the emirate.


This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force.

   Dorothy Parker


[ Parent ]
The War Bet Is Placed | 4 comments
Powered by: SoapBlox