About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Amid Unclear Nominees, Party Turnout Becomes Story of the Race

by: Dean Barker

Sun Jan 20, 2008 at 10:54:11 AM EST


Despite unprecedented early attention and focus on the presidential race among the campaigns and both old and new media, the nominee for the two parties couldn't be less clear.

Hurtling toward February 5th, we have a fractured GOP field, with two candidates (McCain, Huckabee) largely unacceptable to the biggest voices in the GOP stacking up wins and close seconds, while the one the establishment settled on early (Romney) finds that his vast fortune can't hide his mile-wide and inch-deep platform and support. And another big name (Rudy!) has utterly collapsed.

Among Democrats, while it is undeniable that we now have a two-person race, the choice for nominee is even murkier than the elephants.  With huge name endorsements, constituencies, and demographics between them, one with more wins and the other with more (non-super) delegates, and each of them representing a historic change in the person who will occupy the Oval Office, I now doubt that this will be decided soon, even as we hurtle past February 5th.

As crazy as it sounds in 2008, the idea of a brokered convention, on both sides, may not just be for political junkies anymore.

Yet out of such cloudy skies has emerged as clear a ray of light as we can see, and it is undeniably the biggest story of the race so far: turnout.

In Iowa, in New Hampshire, and in Nevada, Democrats are turning out to vote over Republicans in huge numbers.  In Michigan (where the Democratic race didn't matter), despite the Levin-induced mania for an early primary, and with the accompanying millions spent to make it happen, there was depressingly low turnout for Republicans.

But let's leave aside Michigan and look at the three other states, each with great regional and demographic differences among them:

Voter Turnout by Party (rough numbers):

Iowa:     220,000(D)     115,000(R)
New Hampshire:     288,000(D)     239,000(R)
Nevada:     115,800(D)     44,300(R)

Total Democratic Voter Turnout:     623,800
Total Republican Voter Turnout:     398,300

Yes, the GOoPers largely abandoned Nevada (why, exactly, is a good question to ask), but South Carolina is as red a state as can be, and both parties' candidates are campaigning hard there, so once we have next Saturday's vote totals in we should see some more data to look at.

But the emerging narrative is as clear as day: eight years of Bush and Cheney have given the Democratic party an enormous structural advantage this time around.  Let's not blow it.

Dean Barker :: Amid Unclear Nominees, Party Turnout Becomes Story of the Race
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Nomemtum n/t (4.00 / 3)


7 Days
Have you knocked on doors today? Have you made calls ? Have you talked to your neighbors ?  


That's really good. n/t (0.00 / 0)


birch, finch, beech

[ Parent ]
I prefer saying (4.00 / 1)
That America has "Demmentum".

Have you written a letter to the editor today? Have you donated today? Have you put up signs? Have you made calls? Have you talked to your neighbors?

[ Parent ]
sound Demented n/t (0.00 / 0)


7 Days
Have you knocked on doors today? Have you made calls ? Have you talked to your neighbors ?  


[ Parent ]
Comity is overrated ;-) (4.00 / 1)
I have not been in this as long as many Blue Hamsters but the fact that a two person race continues this "late" in the game says something about the mood of the country.

Were I a real Obama Spin Dr. vs. just playing one on BH I would be talking about the refusal of the America voter to crown the presumptive nominee.

That said, SC is very close to "make or break" for BHO. He needs a convincing win or he goes in to Feb 5 in weakened position.

The saying in IT is "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM"  HRC represents IBM in this analogy and the Feb 5 voters (not wanting to risk new "technology") will break strongly in her favor if she beats expectations in SC.

I do not look forward to the week ahead as I fear it will be the nastiest yet in a campaign that when examined will have several noteworthy low points. Both campaigns realize the stakes, it will be a highly charged atmosphere for the next 5 days. Is SC Thunderdome?

I think the multi-state nature of Feb 5  (playing in separate sand-boxes) will allow each candidate to focus on their own strengths vs weaknesses of opponents.

The evening of Feb 5 is going to be a late one... might want to arrange to take the 6th off.

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


Nevada had 10000. Dem Caucus Voters.???? What the heck happened (0.00 / 0)
 Hillary recieved 5335 Votes in the Caucus,  
Obama recieved 4772.votes in the Caucus.

Obama will Win SC. and Feb 5 Will be his also!

 If we don't do it who will?
Teach a mind, change a nation!


[ Parent ]
no (0.00 / 0)
well covered elsewhere if you poke around. That is the number of County Delegates.

I have not yet seen a "popular" vote number.

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


[ Parent ]
karl rove was on cspan talking about how he thought it was funny that the dems in michigan had to choose between hillary, kucinich, gravel, and the departed dodd. (4.00 / 1)
And then went right into a rallying cry about how the Michigan regressive party had the higher turnout.

Really, Karl?  But, you just explained why!

--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


Rove.... he's still got teh "math", eh? (0.00 / 0)


birch, finch, beech

[ Parent ]
I just hope he can adapt to being "in the red", because he won't need a black pen for his side's math this year. (0.00 / 0)


--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


[ Parent ]
Elections are about the voters. (0.00 / 0)
That said, since Republicans don't like to make choices, why would we expect them to actively participate in a primary where choice is the object?  
If turnout was higher in prior years, perhaps a lagging effort in the campaigns to get voters out for show is to blame.

Besides, at some point the gigantic Democratic media buys must have used up all the available time slots.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox