About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Roundup

by: Dean Barker

Thu Mar 06, 2008 at 22:32:48 PM EST


Because the news never stops:

* Poor Jeb Bradley has decided to follow in Sununu's footsteps in calling for a flat tax.  I have to admit I'm mystified by this renewed interest in the most regressive form of taxation this side of the Pledge.  But whatever's in the GOP water, I say: keep drinking it.  The flat tax is a strategy destined to failure in a world where people who make under a million a year are also allowed to vote on election day.

* Listen here to the new radio ads being run for Carol Shea-Porter and Paul Hodes by Americans United for Change.

* AG Kelly Ayotte has issued a cease and desist order against the Republican Governor's Association and their illegal push polls.

* Judd Gregg: still a clown after all these years.   Sorry, Judd. You can't have been the budget chairman for a Bush era that has given debt to our grandchildren and a 3 trillion dollar war and then have any credibility on Obama's fiscal discipline.

* Steiner v. Barker lives for another day: the FISA vote has been put off for a week.

* Michigan wants to set things straight with a caucus. Hoo-ray!  But Clinton has already rejected it, preferring the earlier primary where she was the only name on the ballot. Fancy that.

* Stop John E. Sununu before he sends our crippled housing crisis over the cliff along with our standing in the world..

* A new CQ Today article (subscription required) on the NH-02 race rightly points out that Bob Clegg must be regarded as the frontrunner, despite the early cheerleading the NRCC did for Jennifer Horn.  But CQ is no slouch - they know, with the blue lean of the district, and Hodes' formidable warchest, to rate Bass' old digs as Democrat Favored.

* Speaking of Bass: I always thought that his grandfather, Robert Perkins Bass, was the man behind the New Hampshire Primary.  While that's certainly true to an extent, it was his successor in 1913, Democratic Governor Samuel D. Felker, along with that rarest or rarities, a Democratic state legislature, that made it law, and that ushered in the progressive spirit of presidential primaries that had caught fire in reformist Wisconsin and elsewhere. You learn something new every day, I guess.

Dean Barker :: Roundup
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Roundup | 9 comments
Michigan and FL caucuses (4.00 / 2)
It is getting more unpleasant to agree with the Clinton campaign on anything. But, I was against caucuses before the campaigns started. Their turnout is generally much lower than primaries; they do away with the secret ballot, at least in Iowa-style contests, and are generally more susceptible to social pressure; and becoming a real dynamo at caucus campaigns does a candidate no good whatsoever in November.

But they are less expensive to run - in part because turnout is low.

Here's the compromise: MI and FL vote again (as Obama wants). They hold primaries not caucuses (as Hillary wants). The DNC helps pay for the primaries - perhaps the difference between estimated cost of caucus vs. cost of primaries. That last requires Obnoxious, Self-Important Bloviators including Bill Nelson and the Dingells to back down a bit, and also requires Howard Dean to give in a bit.


That's a pretty good idea (0.00 / 0)
In general I have no problem with caucuses, but in this case I think a primary is the most fair solution.

[ Parent ]
Washington state Dems held their official nominating contest on a different date than the official state vote (0.00 / 0)
And the DNC didn't pay for it.

[ Parent ]
What's your point? (0.00 / 0)
I didn't say the DNC should pay for every contest.

[ Parent ]
They didn't break the rules and they paid for it themselves. (4.00 / 1)
I don't think the DNC should be picking up the bill for FL and MI's selfish blunder, but I suppose compromise will be necessary...

[ Parent ]
Just so. (0.00 / 0)
There's plenty of wiggle room for compromise.

We want the result to
a) allow the Dem leadership in MI and FL to proclaim a victory to their constituents, but
b) leave them with so much remembered pain that they won't try this stunt again.


[ Parent ]
The irony is that they would have been more important if they had moved to late march or early april and followed the rules to begin with. (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I believe I read somewhere that (0.00 / 0)
the Michigan caucus would be one of those "firehouse" caucuses, where people stop into a local municipal building throughout the day and declare their support or something.

But I am not speaking with any expertise on this, nor do I see how that's any different from a sort of ballot-less primary.


[ Parent ]
Meanwhile, is anybody else frustrated that the news media never talks about WHY Michigan and Florida moving up is bad? (0.00 / 0)
They never, ever talk about why the 4-state rules were put in place when talking about this on TV, even with people like Governor Crist.  It's as if they want the viewer to think Michigan and Florida were in the right.

Roundup | 9 comments
Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox