About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Gambler's Fallacy and Government Spending

by: Dean Barker

Tue Jun 03, 2008 at 06:32:59 AM EDT


Well, look at this.  Politico:
Be it Texas Hold 'Em, Razz, Omaha or one of poker's many other variations, more than a few members of Congress are players. Some other rounders are Democratic Reps. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Ed Perlmutter of Colorado and Republican Sens. John Ensign of Nevada and John Sununu of New Hampshire.

While it would be fun to imagine any number of scenarios of John E. gambling his TV ad buys away against the NRSC chair Ensign, I think it might be more useful to point out here that poker playing Sununu is opposed to Native American casinos.

I really hope John E. is a better card player than a money manager.  From a must-read UL editorial op-ed from Kathy Sullivan on Sununu's supposed fiscal conservatism:

Sununu claims to be a fiscal conservative because he voted against the farm bill, yet he has voted six times to lift the debt ceiling, voted for budgets that have exploded the deficit, and supports spending $343 million a day in Iraq.

The two biggest drivers of the exploding national debt are the Bush tax cuts for multimillionaires and the war in Iraq -- both of which Sununu supports. Voting against one bill that would have helped New Hampshire's families, but continuing to support George W. Bush's economic irresponsibility, is not fiscal conservatism.

The reckless fiscal policies that John E. Sununu has supported have put our country on the brink of recession and mortgaged our children's future to China.

Dean Barker :: Gambler's Fallacy and Government Spending
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Of course he plays poker... what else is there to do in smoke-filled rooms? (0.00 / 0)

Very progressive of Sununu to ensure that First Nations people get proper representation. ;^)

I would take a closer look at the UL editorial but Kathy was just telling me the other day that UL editorials are fact-free traps I need to stay away from.



Not an editorial - an op-ed (0.00 / 0)
That's a pet peeve of mine.

Editorials are unsigned and "speak for the paper." Bylined pieces are opinion columns or more specifically - and clearly, in the case of Kathy in the UL - "op-ed" pieces recruited to provide an alternate view.


Thanks for explaining the distinction (0.00 / 0)
I've actually always wondered about that.

[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox