About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Bradley: Standing with Bush on Social Security

by: Ray Buckley

Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 20:31:15 PM EDT


JEB BRADLEY: STANDING WITH GEORGE BUSH
ON SOCIAL SECURITY

(MANCHESTER) Today, Social Security expert Steve Gorin and New Hampshire State Senator Lou D'Allesandro highlighted Jeb Bradley's record of standing with George Bush on Social Security privatization, and discussed the dire consequences of investing social security funds in a volatile stock market.

When he first ran for Congress, Jeb Bradley said that he opposed privatizing social security. But he abandoned that opposition to privatizing Social Security when George Bush told him to. [AP, 2/18/05]

In the wake of recent financial turmoil, even the Wall Street Journal is asking what happens if the market is down when it comes time to retire, and workers have invested their social security taxes in the stock market.  [WSJ, 9/22/08]

"Jeb Bradley has had every opportunity to speak out against personal accounts and investing into a risky market, and he has failed to do so every time," said State Senator Lou D'Allesandro (D-Manchester). "The question is this: Where is Bradley today? And where was he when the privatization discussions were taking place? In politics we know that the record is what speaks loudest."

Steve Gorin of Canterbury was a delegate to both the 1995 and 2005 White House Conferences and Aging, and was also a delegate to the only White House Conference on Social Security.

"Social Security is the only leg that a lot of seniors have to stand on when it comes to retirement," said Gorin, Ph.D, MSW. "Officials in the highest level of government are saying that we face the equivalent of a financial meltdown. Do we really want to trust the well-being of our children and grandchildren to the market?"

"Every political figure has to be prepared, in a forthright and very specific way, to state where they stand on social security and the creation of private accounts," continued Gorin. "We can't allow people to dodge that question. Carol Shea-Porter is very clearly against privatization. Where does Jeb Bradley stand?"

There are currently 225,250 Social Security beneficiaries in New Hampshire, and 11.5% of the New Hampshire First Congressional District is over 65 years old -- over 76,000 seniors.

###

Ray Buckley :: Bradley: Standing with Bush on Social Security
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A couple of thoughts-- (0.00 / 0)
If Wall Street gets the bailout the Bushies are pushing, then there won't be anything left to invest Social Security funds in.  Indeed, you could consider this effort as a back-door way to pledge those funds as security for stuff we didn't want to buy in the first place.

Of course, the SS trust fund is bigger than the initial amount requested for the bailout, but it's just the beginning.

Conservatives have long been concerned about what they call the underground economy, which may be as large as a third of the one they can account for.  How to get the participants into the system has been a conundrum and the private accounts are supposed to be a partial solution.  The recent distribution of "rebates" was another effort to capture more people into the federal records.  That's why only people who had filed tax returns were eligible and the people who didn't need to file because they didn't earn enough were "encouraged" to file a return to just get the rebate.  I expect that somebody calculated that the additions to the system would soon pay more in taxes than the rebate cost.
Republicans are always looking to get more revenue while pretending to charge (tax) less.  It's the equivalent of business relying on volume of sales to increase revenue and decreasing material input (quality) to increase volume with shoddy product.  That's what happens when profit, rather than quality, is the driving criterion.

Providing shoddy goods and services has become a Republican hallmark.  It lets them argue for another chance to do better.
Democrats don't need to resort to that argument.  In this case, (Hodes and Shea-Porter) they can simply argue that the change we want takes time and can't be accomplished all at once. And it certainly won't be accomplished by people who measure success as longevity in office.

Bradley still seems not to have realized that he was dismissed from office for non-feasance.  Seems to think he didn't try hard enough just to stay in.

Tax cuts are the present day equivalent of "I can get it for you wholesale."  What's never revealed is that these "wholesale" products were what we'd now call "seconds"--i.e. shoddy stuff.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox