About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Carol Shea-Porter statement on bailout vote

by: susanthe

Mon Sep 29, 2008 at 15:01:27 PM EDT


Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter released the following statement after voting against the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act:

"Our economy has been battered by eight years of a financial wild west on Wall Street.  There was no oversight and no accountability.  I thought it was a mistake for the Administration to ask Congress to vote on a $700 billion bill to bail out Wall Street with only a single week to consider the proposal and a single day to review it.  The Administration asked Congress to give up its Constitutional power of the purse and hand over a blank check for $700 billion.  Congress said no.

"While I believe it is essential to address our credit and liquidity crisis, I voted against the Bush Bailout.  I could not support the bill because it did not address the fundamental problem in our economy that caused the crisis in our financial institutions.

"I voted against the bill because it gave the Secretary of the Treasury -- a political appointee -- unfettered control over the execution of the bailout program.  If the bill had passed, the Secretary of the Treasury would have had absolute authority to decide which securities to buy, from whom to purchase, and how much to pay.  The Secretary of the Treasury would have also had absolute authority to decide who he would hire to manage the assets he purchased.  

"More than four hundred economists, including three Nobel Laureates, appealed to Congress to slow down and make sure we got this right.  Congress took about 8 months to draft and pass the legislation establishing the Resolution Trust Corporation -- and this only involved about $100 billion of taxpayer money.  Certainly, Congress needs more time than one week to invest $700 billion of taxpayer money in a bailout.

"American taxpayers need a better bill, a better plan, and better protection.  That is why I voted to stay in Washington and continue working on this bill.  That is why I voted against this bill."

susanthe :: Carol Shea-Porter statement on bailout vote
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thanks Susan (4.00 / 1)
That is why I voted to stay in Washington and continue working on this bill.

More on this, please. Now what?


I agree (0.00 / 0)
we need to do something, I just don't think this bill was the right one.

I applaud CSP and Paul Hodes for their independence on this issue, as on many.  They have not made friends with Barney Frank today, but thankfully, they don't answer to him, they answer to us.

Feeling hopeful since 2004...


Barney Frank is not the problem here. He's on our side. (0.00 / 0)
It's the other side that's causing trouble.

Also, let's not kid ourselves, just because the Republicans disagree on how to deal with the problem doesn't change the fact that they have locked arms and stood together for decades in creating this problem--including McCain, Palin, and Sununu.

--
Twitter: @DougLindner


[ Parent ]
not suggesting he's the problem (0.00 / 0)
just that he's probably not happy with the 1/3 of Dems who voted against the bailout.

Feeling hopeful since 2004...

[ Parent ]
A plague on both their houses (0.00 / 0)
It's clear that this bill failed to satisfy on both sides of the aisle.  The fact that 95 Democrats voted against the bill proves that the Democratic leadership did not do their work as adequately as they could have.  However, the Republicans feeble attempt to pin the failure of the bill entirely on Nancy Pelosi's floor speech is incredibly detestable.  I agree with Barney Frank on that point that those supposed "Dirty Dozen" (that's what I'll call them) didn't vote yes just because of a few harsh words that she had for the Bush adminstration is just nonsense.

However, I would not expect anything great to come out of this, in terms of a bill that will actually do anything for the country as a whole.  Bush and Cheney were calling their buds in Congress and telling them to vote for the bill.  They (and the Republican House leadership) apparently couldn't even muster those dozen or so votes extra required to get the bill to pass.

But as far as Bush and Cheney are concerned, their impact on the political atmosphere is less important.  What is important to remember is that John McCain, having been absent from the Senate for six months, parachuted in last week to try to be a fourth quarter quarterback who woud throw the Hail Mary pass in the last few seconds to win the game for the Republicans.  Not only of course did he contribute nothing but consternation, he now has to answer as to why he thinks his presence was so benevolent to his own party.  The only thing more unsound now than the fundamentals of the economy are the fundamentals of John McCain.

Oh, did I hear there was a VP debate this week?  Maybe Palin will bail out McCain by deliniating further on that "umbrella of job creation".  


The Democratic leadership said from the start (4.00 / 2)
that they needed 80-100 votes from the Republican side. They had no intention of pushing a deeply unpopular measure through while Republicans painted it as a Democratic bill. Offering to drive it through with a Republican split of 80 for / 118 against was pretty conciliatory.

The Republicans only delivered 65 votes.


[ Parent ]
For a rather trenchant analysis of the fine print see (0.00 / 0)
Kos diary


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox