Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
A little while ago James Pindell came up with a list of 62 Republicans he thinks could get at least 18 percent against John Lynch. 17 percent is what Joe Kenney got in the latest UNH poll.
It's a pretty funny post, but it's got me wondering. I hardly ever think about the NH-Gov race, because, well, there's nothing to think about.
But here's the thing: in a year where we might be looking at another tidal wave in-state for Democrats, especially as Obama starts to break free in the polling, what effect does having a non-presence on the Republican side of a leading race mean for the others both up and down the ticket?
I'm thinking this is a really unexpected (from the perspective of the start of the cycle) but happy bonus for us. And while sometimes the bi-partisan tenor of Lynch's style makes me crazy, this is an area where it could pay off big for other Democrats on election day.