Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Homeowners - like the banks, much of corporate America and the government itself - are suffering under the weight of excessive debt. The Obama plan will make mortgage indebtedness more manageable, but ultimately the debt itself needs to be greatly reduced. The sooner we as a nation move in that direction, the better.
This is a better written and more concise version of what I've been ranting about.
But how do we get there? The NYT suggests finding ways to reduce principal on the various debt instruments. One different idea unrelated to reducing principal I've been kicking around in my head is muscling banks into absurdly low interest rates (below 5%), and perhaps repackaging various consumer debt items into one or two loans. I think this would save banks a whole lot more money in the long run, and give middle class America a means to an ongoing stimulus to, say, fix that leaky roof that's been put indefinitely on the back burner.
My sense is that The 21st Century's Great Recession is so wide, and deep, and particular in its origin, that we need to think more boldly and outside of the box than perhaps is the case. Keeping insolvent zombie banks "alive" by an IV drip of taxpayer money, for example, is likely not bold enough.
Adding: and by thinking more boldly, I mean re-examining the values we hold about banks, about debt, about the role of government, about the commonweal. I think the nation is already having an internal conversation re-examining the values of health coverage, so this is not an impossible place to go.