Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
On April 9, 2009, I submitted the following letter to Foster's Daily Democrat, which they censored. (They are within their rights not to run it, but they did run many other letters about the Bud Martin- Jeb Bradley race, some of which were much more uninteresting and/or much more untrue than mine):
Former Congressman (and current State Senate candidiate) Jeb Bradley stated that a "nearly 10% percent hike" in the Rooms and Meals tax is being considered in the New Hampshire legislature. The Democratic majority amendment to HB2 (the main budget bill) in the NH House of Representatives actually only proposed raising the rooms and meals tax from 8% to 8.75%.
I do not know where Jeb Bradley studied fourth grade math. However, I am pretty sure (if I correctly remember what Mrs. Metcalf taught me 42 years ago at Mast Way School in Lee) that 8.75% minus 8% is only 0.75%- or 3/4 of 1%. The proposed increase is arguably "nearly" 1%, but it is nowhere near 10%.
Jeb stated that the proposed sales--- ahem! rooms and meals--- tax hike from 8.75% to 8% was a "nearly 10%" hike. 8.75 divided by 8 is indeed almost 1.10--- but that's not a 10% hike, because you don't divide a higher percentage by a lower percentage. You subtract the lower percentage from the higher percentage.
Happily, Foster's saved me from publishing a mischaracterization of HB2 as the "main" budget bill. HB2, even though it is much more extensively debated than HB1, is the "trailer bill" for the budget. HB1 is where all the numbers in the budget are specified, and HB2 sets out the rules by which the budget is constructed and says where the money comes from. But that may not be why they didn't run my letter. They have published much more glaring factual errors than that on their letters page. (And, there are glaring factual errors every day elsewhere in the paper, but we only expect correct facts from the Letters to the Editor correspondents. We don't expect true facts from the editor herself or from her staff.)
