About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

War on ACORN

by: JimC

Wed Sep 16, 2009 at 19:21:34 PM EDT


Why do Fox and its ilk pursue ACORN so vociferously?

It's as if they have to prove they were right about them during the campaign.

Problem 1: They weren't.

Problem 2: They still aren't.

(Hat tip to Atrios)

Apparently the recent hissy fit stems from a prank.

More from the San Francisco Chronicle (a conservative columnist, apparently).

Now the right has its own Borat-style entertainment. Equipped with a video camera, conservative activists James O'Keefe, 25, and Hannah Giles, 20, sought the answer to this question: "What if a 'prostitute' and her alleged law school boyfriend walk into ACORN seeking housing for an underage brothel to fund his future congressional campaign?"

The answer, they discovered, was that some of the folks who work at ACORN (the left-leaning Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) were overly adept at looking the other way - even after O'Keefe and Giles told them that Salvadoran girls as young as 12 would be working as prostitutes in their brothel.

A prank that made it to Fox. And just a while ago, I saw Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA, famous as the man who began the recall against Gray Davis) call ACORN "a criminal organization" on CNN.

One ACORN worker told the couple they could list the under-aged prostitutes as dependents "because they live in your house, especially if they're under 16." Some organizers emphasized that it was not their job to judge others. A Baltimore worker tried to sign up the couple as dues-paying ACORN members.

ACORN has reacted by charging that the videotapes were "doctored" and charged O'Keefe and Giles with trolling for damning material. ACORN also claims the couple is not airing tape from offices where they were shown the door. The Philadelphia Daily News, for example, reported that the local ACORN office kicked out O'Keefe and Giles and filed a police report.

This may be more complex than it seems.

On Monday, the Senate voted 83-7 for a measure by Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., to prohibit granting federal housing funds to ACORN. California Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer - yes, Barbara Boxer - voted for the measure.

This is progress. As recently as March, however, the Senate tabled an amendment banning federal funding for ACORN - which has received $53 million directly from Uncle Sam since 1994 - despite several state investigations into ACORN voter registration. Last year, ACORN was forced to acknowledge that election officials rejected 400,000 of the 1.3 million people the group had tried to register.

That last bit is pretty damning, but I can't confirm it on the ACORN site. It seems to be a widely circulated figure, but only among right-wing sources.

It would be nice if our so-called liberal (non-Fox) media defended the good work ACORN does.

I'd offer to hold my breath, but I have already turned blue.

JimC :: War on ACORN
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
War on ACORN | 3 comments
It's ludicrous (4.00 / 2)
The video that is making the rounds documents some bad stuff.  But the basic premise of the anti-ACORN wackiness is that it's impoverished homeless people, rather than wealthy people, who arrange racketeering disruptions of democracy.  And that's ludicrous.

I don't recall this point being made about the Texas Rangers (0.00 / 0)
Obama worked for Acorn and Acorn worked for Obama. That doesn't mean the president is implicated in any wrongdoing, but it suggests at least that the worse things get for Acorn, the more embarrassing it is for him.

http://online.wsj.com/article/...

But the logic gets better. Because of one incident which has nothing to do with the administration, we should have a special prosecutor.

If the Justice Department fails to prosecute, it invariably would raise suspicions of political favoritism. This column does not care for special prosecutors, but the case for appointing one would seem to be stronger here than usual.

"This column does not care for special prosecutors ... " Or didn't, I suppose, from 2001 to 2008.


Punked. (4.00 / 1)
It now seems that some ACORN people decided to see
how outrageous they could be until the "investigators" caught on that they were being fooled.  Seems they didn't and neither did FOX.

Anyway, THIS is the kind of action that's got people in a tizzy.

Also,
http://community.comcast.net/c...

In 2001, after being investigated by the Federal Trade Commission, the company settled a dispute with ACORN, a national organization of community groups, promising to offer $360 million in low-cost loans.

On 1 August 2005, Ameriquest announced that it would set aside $325 million to settle attorney-general investigations in 30 states to settle allegations that it had preyed on borrowers with hidden fees and ballooning payments.[1] In at least five of those states-California, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, and Florida-Ameriquest had already settled multimillion-dollar suits. Brian Montgomery, the Federal Housing Administration commissioner said that the Ameriquest settlement reinforced his concern that the industry was exploiting borrowers, and that he "was shocked to find those customers had been lured away by the "fool's gold" of subprime loans".[

As I said in another comment, the voter stuff is a distraction.


War on ACORN | 3 comments

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox