About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

How Republicans Could Deny Democrats a Health Care Victory

by: RealNRH

Sat Sep 26, 2009 at 13:56:46 PM EDT


I posted a similar diary over at dKos yesterday, but it was late and I was tired, and I think I don't need to ramble so much to get to the key point I had. Republicans have an easy way to influence the health care legislation as it passes through Congress and deny Democrats the opportunity to take all the credit for it.

It's called legislating.

RealNRH :: How Republicans Could Deny Democrats a Health Care Victory
Republicans remember that after liberals in Congress got Social Security and other social safety net programs passed, suddenly an awful lot of people had very strong pro-Democrat feelings for several decades. Republicans are aware, or at least the ones operating at the strategic level are, that universal health care is wildly popular in every developed nation that has it (i.e. almost all of them except us). They are quite afraid that Democrats will pass a wildly popular bill such as universal health care and proceed to reap another several decades of political pre-eminence. And for their own political futures, they can't bear the idea of that happening.

The only tactic they can conceive of to stop a Democratic health care bill from passing is complete withdrawal from the process, doing everything in their power to prevent the bill entirely and block every element of it that they can. They operate in a binary world like that: there has to be a winner and a loser, and if they block a bill the Democrats lose and if not the Democrats win. Yes, everything in their sorry mindset is predicated off of fear of the other guy winning more than what the other guy actually wants to do. The downside they face with that tack is that if and when they do lose, then they've made sure that they'll be remembered for their loud opposition, and definitely cast into that same abyss they're afraid of - but one they'll have made even deeper by their own actions.

It never even occurs to them that they can make sure a Democratic health care bill never passes by a different, more subtle method. Like I said, it's called legislating. If they participate in the creation of the bill (like adults, and like they were at least theoretically elected to do), then they can make a credible case that the bill is theirs, too - but then Democrats don't lose, so as far as Republicans are concerned, that means Republicans don't win. They don't care that even a plurality of their own party wants a bill; they care about denying Democrats what Democrats want.

So that's the situation. Republicans have doubled down against a bill that enjoys widespread popularity even among their own base, have no way to back down from their position, and wouldn't even think of that option anyhow. I think that at this point, things might actually work out better for it. We're starting to see signs of life from the Democratic leadership, having let the Republicans establish that they are not credible participants in the process now making some statements about moving forward with only Democratic input, since Republicans won't vote for it anyhow.

And you know what? That means that precisely because Republicans decided to make it a fight instead of working together, Democrats have a chance for a major win.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Some people are into depriving others of things they don't even (0.00 / 0)
want for themselves.  That never occurred to me until recently.  I always assumed that some people wanted what other people had and would try to get it by hook or by crook.  And I assumed that this included such non-material things as power and influence.
But, that's not what's involved with deprivation--which is sort of a cousin of torture.  That is, for some people, depriving others of some the necessities of life, though not life itself, is a source of satisfaction.  It's sort of like pulling the wings off flies.  It's torture for the victim, but for the perpetrator it's something else.  Damned if I know what.


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox