Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
(And don't forget to hang out at Susan's place now and then. Great stuff there. - promoted by Dean Barker)
this was published as an op-ed in the 10/23 edition of the Conway Daily Sun
Ah, New Hampshire. This year we had a long, cold, wet spring; a cold, wet summer, and a glorious fall with spectacular foliage. It was a rancorous year in the NH legislature, with the budget being a particular thorny issue. Mel Thomson and William Loeb still dictate our tax policy from the grave, and Judd Gregg voted in favor of rape. It was a year blissfully free of electoral politics for most of us, but the end of the year is drawing near. Next year we'll be voting for 2 Congresscritters, one US Senator, the entire NH legislature, the Executive Council, and the Governor.
The NH GOP is unhappy about losing their divine right to run our state. Despite steady losses in the last 4 years, they have not been able to come up with a new message. They're still saying "no taxes and cut spending." It was a great message in 1910. In 2010 the reality is somewhat different. Things cost more, an elementary concept that the NH GOP is unable to embrace. Sure, there are ways to spend less money. At a time when many states are eliminating the costly death penalty as a way to save millions, NH is the only state looking to begin executions. The budget for lead paint testing has been cut recently, but we'll be building a death row and an execution chamber.
CONCORD - The national economic crisis continues to impact New Hampshire families and businesses, and the state budget isn't immune, with revenues for the next fiscal year expected to come in lower than those in 2004. Yet Republicans continue to claim that new revenue is not needed to balance the budget and instead are calling for unspecified cuts that would likely result in sharp local property tax hikes.
However, it wasn't too long ago that Republicans found themselves in a similar situation when they held majorities in the legislature and had to put together a balanced budget in a sluggish economy.
The difference between the budget passed by Republicans in 1990 and the budget Democratic leaders are proposing now is that Democrats are making tough choices to reduce the bottom line. Democrats this year are proposing to cut the state's workforce by 5 percent, close five districts courts and the Laconia prison. Republicans in 1990 chose to create new taxes and raise existing taxes in order to increase overall spending and to make up for a massive expansion of state spending throughout the 1980s.
In 1990, Republican leaders used new taxes and tax increases instead of cuts to balance the budget after inheriting a record deficit left by former Gov. John H. Sununu, who increased spending by 27.5 percent while in office and is now the state party chair.
Then-Republican Speaker of the House Doug Scamman said of the need to raise taxes in the midst of serious economic challenges, "These issues are bigger than party or personal political objectives. Today, we must all be statesmen. I ask that you face your obligations as legislators to vote responsibly today. Put the political considerations aside and face your responsibilities."
According to the 1990 House Journal, Representative Scamman's argument was successful in persuading his Republican majority to increase taxes and spending - in fact 17 Republicans still serving in the Legislature voted for the bloated budget. Republicans approved:
* An estimated $14 million increase in telecommunication taxes for consumers
* An estimated $11.9 million increase in the real estate transfer tax
* An estimated $8.5 million increase in the tobacco tax
* An estimated $2.3 million increase on the beer tax
* An estimated $13.9 million increase in the Meals & Rooms tax
* Increased taxes on motorists, including a $5 process fee for diesel fuel users
* A 5 to 7 percent tax increase on gambling profits
"Republican legislators must be suffering from a severe case of amnesia," said Ray Buckley, Chair of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. "It wasn't too long ago that they passed historic tax increases and out-of-control spending during an economic crisis. Republicans should stop playing politics and start naming their cuts."
(Posted by Victoria Bonney, Communications Director for the New Hampshire Democratic Party)
State Rep. Tara Reardon was appointed by Governor Lynch to become the new State Commissioner of Employment Security, and has resigned from the NH House. Rep. Reardon was also the Chairperson of the House Commerce Committee.
State Representative Ed Butler of Harts Location was the Vice Chair, and is now the Chair of the Commerce Committee.
Representative Butler is currently serving his second term in the NH House. As a constituent, and someone who has worked to get him elected, I'm incredibly proud of him, and happy for him. He really loves serving in the legislature. Ed is honored and humbled by this new opportunity.
I missed this story earlier as crowded as it was towards Christmas, but I think it hits on an important subject:
A Salem lawmaker is behind a proposal to raise the pay for New Hampshire legislators, currently the lowest-paid in the country.
Republican Rep. Anthony DiFruscia is the prime sponsor of a proposed constitutional amendment that would raise state legislators pay from $100 a year plus mileage to $100 a week plus mileage. Constitutional amendments must win three-fifths support in the House and Senate to go before voters. Two-thirds of voters must approve for an amendment to take effect.
Our friends over at GraniteGrok think this eats into our tradition of the citizen legislator, a tradition where one goes, serves, and returns to private life.
To which I say -- baloney. The majority of our legislators are not people called to serve mid-career, but retirees (who finally have flexible time) and small business owners (who can make their time more flexible).
It's great that those constituencies are represented. It's somewhat less great that people with a 9 to 5 background (or 8 to 5 background -- who gets paid lunch anymore?) are not represented.
I'd actually go further, bring the yearly sum closer to $10,000 and halve the number of legislators. In a world where technology has shrunk distance and improved communication, a representative can surely handle more constituents. At $10,000 you might just be able to see someone taking their day job down to part-time to serve.
You want real citizen legislators? That's how you do it.
Of course, I don't see half the legislators voting themselves out of office anytime soon, so we'll take this proposal of $5,000 a year as a start.
Final note: Funniest quote in the article, hands down --Gene Charron talking about this radical proposal to give our legislators $5,000 a year. He thinks the current system is just fine, because, well, here's the quote:
"Instead of some fat cat thinking, you know, 'OK, this is a career,' it's not a career (in New Hampshire)," said Rep. Gene Charron, R-Chester. "It's got to be a love for your state."
Fat cat? Career? On $5,000 a year?
I take it all back. Our legislature isn't out of touch at all...
Republicans want to regain control of N.H. Legislature
By Norma Love
Associated Press
December 28, 2007 1:43 PM
CONCORD, N.H. - Democrats are in charge of New Hampshire's Legislature, but Republicans want to take back their historical role of calling the shots.
And that means the 2008 legislative session starting Wednesday will be more political than ever as policy takes on an even harsher partisanship edge than usual.
Look for sharp divisions especially over health insurance, abortion and school funding as the two parties highlight their philosophical differences in advance of the November election
Full story:
http://www.seacoastonline.com/...
I post this as a reminder to everyone that there can't be a break after the presidential primary. This is going to be a very tough year and we don't have a minute to spare.
A rather historic vote was taken Thursday in Concord. For the first time, a committee of the New Hampshire State Legislature endorsed a civil unions bill, which would allow same-gendered couples to have all of the same "rights, obligations, and responsibilities" currently given to differently-gendered couples.
The House Judiciary Committee voted in a very bipartisan 15-5 vote to approve House Bill 437. Some real stars on the Committee speaking for the bill included Chair David Cote of Nashua, Gail Morrison of Sanbornton, and Bette Lasky of Nashua.
If it passes on the House floor this coming week and is approved by the State Senate, it would be historic in another way: this would be the very first time that a state has adopted legal unions for same-gendered couples without any threat of court action first. New Hampshire would join Vermont, Connecticut, and New Jersey as the only states with civil unions. California has a fairly extensive domestic relationships law, but comes short of formal unions for same-gendered couples. Massachusetts allows marriage for its gay and lesbian citizens, but that was court mandated and hasn't been vetoed by their legislature.
Our action in favor of equality contrasts positively to the 27 states where constitutional amendments have been adopted prohibiting same-gendered relationships. New Hampshire is also one of just 20 states protecting sexual orientation as part of our civil rights law; in some 30 states one can still be fired, or denied housing or services, just because of being gay.
It's not finalized yet, of course. The State Senate would have to vote favorably if the House approves the bill. And we can expect a tough floor fight in the House.
And Governor John Lynch hasn't said he will allow civil unions to become law, with or without his signature. I'm confident he will, however, because from my knowing him since the early 1970s, I've always found him to be an inherently fair person. While he has stated he would veto gay marriage, he has indicated he will consider something else, and that he is opposed to discrimination against our tens of thousands of gay and lesbian citizens. Now he can deliver.
Civil unions isn't marriage, with the word. While it provides all the same rights, obligations, and responsibilities of marriage, it isn't marriage. That fight has to continue, and I'll be joining others on that effort. Another bill was approved by the Judiciary Committee that would create a serious study and analysis about marriage for gays and lesbians.
Progress on equality, however, occurs step by step. We've come so far because of the hard work and sacrifices of so many so far. Civil unions is a positive step. If one has a 20 foot pond to jump over, it sure helps if there's a stepping stone in the middle.
HB 437 is sponsored by Somersworth State Representative Dana Hilliard and myself, but working hard for its passage have been most of the openly gay members of the House: Marlene DeChane of Barrington, Ed Butler of Harts Location, David Pierce of Etna, as well as Gail Morrison. Most were at the all-day hearing on the bill a couple of weeks ago, and the 6 hour Committee voting session, joined by former State Representative Ray Buckley. Former State Senator Rick Trombly has worked hard on this and other equality issues as well.