Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
After a month of silence on the issue, Guinta on Monday disputed the news report and said the complaint is based on false information.
"I never directly or indirectly solicited the RGA," Guinta said.
The Union Leader on Monday stood by the report, published Aug. 27.
There are two new developments here:
1) Frank Guinta has broken his month-long silence with a denial.
2) The Union Leader makes a point of explicitly standing by the accuracy of their source.
A key paragraph from an NHDP release (email) on the heels of this offers more detail:
WMUR also reported that according to "several sources with direct knowledge of the events" Guinta said "the Republican Governor's Association would give $100,000 to the state party, but not as long as Kimball was there." [WMUR, 8/27/2011] Both WMUR and the Union Leader reported that Senator Kelly Ayotte, Congressman Bass, Senate President Bragdon, and Speaker Bill O'Brien all had knowledge of Guinta's solicitation to the RGA from a conference call.
So: who's not telling the truth? The Union Leader, or Frank Guinta?
My criticism of the New Hampshire Union Leader has been long and loud. But I'm not sure it's ever once been about the accuracy of facts in their non-editorial reportage.
In other news, Rep. Guinta has recently been named one of the most corrupt members of Congress.
Today Frank Guinta - recently named one of the most corrupt members of Congress - was the subject of yet another FEC complaint.
Back when the Republican elite in New Hampshire were trying to show off how the money would roll in - if only they could depose of Tea Party leader Jack Kimball - someone leaked this to the Union Leader:
Guinta mentioned that he had contacted several national groups for money and that he had been hoping "to get up to $100,000 from the Republican Governors Association (for the NHGOP)," the source said.
and:
When Kimball asked for examples, the source said, (House Speaker Bill) O'Brien mentioned that he had been told by Guinta that the RGA had refused a donation request.
According to the complaint filed today, this is illegal:
The Federal Election Campaign Act prohibits federal candidates and officeholders like Congressman Frank Guinta from soliciting, directing, or transferring, or spending funds in connection with an election that are outside the federal restrictions and limits. Under those limits, federal candidates and officeholders may solicit up to $10,000 per year from federally permissible sources - such as individuals and federal multicandidate committees - for the federal and nonfederal accounts of a state party. But $100,000 is in far excess of the limits and the RGA is a non-permissible federal donor.
The RGA denies it:
"At no point did the RGA commit resources nor were we solicited to do so," (RGA spox Mike) Schrimpf said.
Frank Guinta had the same response to this as he did to being named "most corrupt":
A spokesman for Guinta said the congressman had no immediate comment.
Some questions that come to mind: Who's not telling the truth - the Union Leader's source, or the RGA? And who was the source? Frank Guinta himself? Bill O'Brien?
The non-partisan watchdog CREW made official what we've suspected: that both of our congressmen, Frank Guinta and Charlie Bass are among the 14 most corrupt of over 500 members of Congress.
Perhaps this renewed scrutiny into Frank Guinta's campaign mystery money (still unresolved by FEC) can bring needed press attention to a more recent matter.
Union Leader, August 26, 2011:
Guinta mentioned that he had contacted several national groups for money and that he had been hoping "to get up to $100,000 from the Republican Governors Association [for the NHGOP]," the source said.
The question here is whether the Union Leader's source inadvertently revealed illegal activity by Guinta for soliciting well beyond the federal campaign limit. Even if that solicitation was for NHGOP and not his own re-election campaign.
From Mother Jones, key piece of information on a related issue. This concerns a loophole scheme for federal officeholders to solicit unlimited funds for super-PACs, which in turn could then spend unlimited amounts in their districts bashing their opponents (quite analogous to state party spending):
Last week, the campaign finance watchdog's top attorneys quietly released a draft opinion declaring that Bopp's plan violates campaign finance law. Specifically, the attorneys pointed to the McCain-Feingold law, which bans elected officials and candidates from soliciting "soft money," or unlimited campaign contributions, in connection with a federal election. The attorneys added that it's OK for federal officials to appear and speak at fundraisers where unlimited cash is being raised, so long as they don't directly solicit it themselves.
Oh, did I forget to mention that the current RGA chair is Bob McDonnell, who is headlining a huge fundraiser for NHGOP days from now? And the previous chairman, who left the post recently because of his presidential run, is Rick Perry?
This knocked me over (please go here for the backstory):
Guinta mentioned that he had contacted several national groups for money and that he had been hoping "to get up to $100,000 from the Republican Governors Association," the source said.
But Guinta told the group that "before any money was discussed, he was told by the RGA that they must put their resources where "they are going to be useful and not wasted and they think that the party is so badly run, that Jack Kimball has so little ability to get the message out that they just can't see putting money in that direction," according to the source.
Does anyone honestly believe federal officeholder Frank Guinta is calling around various groups out of the goodness of his heart to help the state party?
Likely, Frank Guinta, like all incumbents, is doing one thing with his dialing-for-dollars time - helping himself.
So that begs the question: What does a member of our federal delegation want with a group that helps gubernatorial candidates?
Oh, did I mention that, unlike with federal candidates such as Guinta, you can contribute unlimited amounts of money to groups like the RGA? Who then can give whatever they want to the state party?
In other news, in the 2010 race Frank Guinta loaned himself $355,000 that didn't appear to be his to loan. To date he has refused to produce a simple bank statement proving it's his, despite bipartisan complaints filed with the Federal Election Commission.
Why are we letting out of state billionaires use the TeeVee to try to swing our elections here in New Hampshire? No self-respecting Granite Stater should put up with that.