About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

SOTU

Repealing DADT?

by: j cicirelli

Wed Jan 27, 2010 at 19:59:09 PM EST

(Please o please o please let the GOP run in 2010 on opposing DADT repeal... - promoted by Dean Barker)

CNN is reporting that Obama will request a repeal of DADT.  Is this a sign that he's willing to fight for progressive principles?

Link: http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITI...

Of course, because discrimination has worked so well, Bohner and the Republicans are against changing the policy.

Discuss :: (14 Comments)

Bush's Final SOTU LiveBlog and Open Thread

by: Dean Barker

Mon Jan 28, 2008 at 21:08:59 PM EST

The Beard's channel has a stream going.

Check out this SOTU tag cloud that goes all the way back to George Washington.  For Bush II, the most frequented words are Iraq, terrorists, and Qaeda, while the better George was fond of Constitution, freedom, and liberties.

Also, looks like the opposition to telecom immunity has prevailed yet again.  And how could it not with words like these from Senator Chris Dodd?

It took three decades, three branches of government, four presidents, and 12 Congresses to patiently, painstakingly build up (the FISA) machinery. It only took one president to tear it down. Generations of leaders handed over to President Bush a system that brought security under the law, a system primed to bless nearly any eavesdropping he could conceive.

And he responded: "No thank you. I'd rather break the law."

He ignored not just a federal court, but a secret federal court; not just a secret federal court, but a secret federal court prepared to sign off on his actions ninety nine point nine percent of the time. And he still hasn't given us a good reason why. He still hasn't shown how his lawbreaking makes us safer.

This is a LiveBlog/Open Thread.

Discuss :: (106 Comments)

Sununu Speaks on the Eve of the State of the Union

by: Dean Barker

Mon Jan 28, 2008 at 20:09:49 PM EST

John E. Sununu talks about Iraq just before President Bush's State of the Union address:
And from the United States' perspective, I believe that the new government and a stronger, credible government chosen by the Iraqi people will help accelerate the process of training Iraqi security forces in order to deal with the insurgents and also to enable U.S. forces to over a long period to withdraw.

WOODRUFF: Senator, the Democratic leader in the Senate, Harry Reid, is saying today that above all now there needs to be an exit strategy, among other things, he said, so we know when the job is done. Do you agree with him?

SUNUNU: Well, I don't agree with the premise that there isn't an exit strategy. There's been a process for withdrawing U.S. forces in place for well over a year now.

...WOODRUFF: And what -- how long do you think it is going to take for Iraqi forces to be able to stand up on their own without the support of American troops?

SUNUNU: I don't know. I was asked that question yesterday, and my honest perspective is I don't know precisely what the timetable will be.

I'm not an expert in determining what level of training, how many weeks it takes, it is a six-week course, an eight-week course, a four- week course. Do you train 5,000 at once, a thousand at once. That's what our armed forces are there to do. That's the job that they should be focused on.

So, there you have it. John E.'s  no expert, so he can't tell you how many weeks it'll take for Iraq to stand on its own.

That was three years and two thousand, five hundred and sixty-eight soldiers ago.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox