About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

A Sorry State of Affairs

by: PaulHodes

Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 11:24:39 AM EDT


( - promoted by Dean Barker)

I've spent a lot of time on this blog talking about how we need to end business as usual in Washington. Earlier this week, we got another disheartening reminder of what business as usual has become. Rather than stand up for the voices of the people who define and deliver democracy in this country, the Republicans in Washington resorted to political obstructionism and caved to the special interests, once again. They successfully filibustered the DISCLOSE Act, which is a crucial first step in undoing the damage inflicted by the Citizens United Supreme Court case. It would have allowed us to start closing the door on corporations trying to buy our elections.

You know what? I wasn't surprised by their filibuster. I was expecting it. I'm sure you were too.

But I think everyone here can agree - it is one sorry state of affairs that leads us to expect special interest-funded obstructionism from our public servants.  

PaulHodes :: A Sorry State of Affairs
Sadly, it's the ugly truth of what the Republican Party is doing down in Washington. They are too busy answering to their corporate constituency to stand up for the people they are supposed to represent. Even worse, Kelly Ayotte and the Republicans running up here in New Hampshire are falling in line with them.

During the health care debate, they sided with the health insurance companies that were denying us care and jacking up rates. On Wall Street reform, they sided with the big banks and their wealthy executives who earned billions in bonuses while Main Street suffered. And in the wake of the devastating Gulf spill, they apologized to BP and stood with Big Oil as the spill wreaked havoc on the environment and area residents lost their way of life.

I am sick and tired of Washington Republicans and folks like Kelly Ayotte going out of their way to stand up for the special interests.

In preventing the DISCLOSE Act from even coming to a vote, they made sure they kept a table reserved, front and center, for corporations trying to buy their way into our democratic process.

I believe that's wrong. I believe the people of New Hampshire and this country deserve better than that from their public servants. Now more than ever, we need to stop the untold millions that will be spent by Corporate America, in New Hampshire and in states across the country, as they try to drown out our voices.

That's why I introduced a constitutional amendment named after New Hampshire campaign-finance icon Doris "Granny D" Haddock. The amendment will make absolutely sure that corporations can't pick and choose who we sent to represent us in our nation's capital.

Take a moment to visit my site, read the full constitution amendment, and then sign up as a cosponsor. Help me make sure that Kelly Ayotte and the Republican politicians down Washington get the message - elections belong to the people that decide them, not the special interests trying to buy them.

(Cross-posted at Daily Kos)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If you don't want private corporations (artificial persons) (0.00 / 0)
acting like and enjoying the rights of natural persons, then restrict them in the same way that public corporations are limited by the federal and state Constitutions.  Of course, to do that, the Congress has to rule that corporations which engage in interstate or international enterprise require a federal charter, which can be removed, if they don't comply with the restrictions.  The federal government trying to regulate state-created entities is a non-starter and designed to fail.  Bribes, in the form of special concessions and monopoly conditions (dedicated air routes) have already proven ineffective.  If you want to regulate, you've got to create. (The Federal Reserve is a precedent).

Of course, one reason why our public officials are not keen on regulating private corporations like the public corporations of which they are a part is because they enjoy the opportunity public/private partnerships provide for making deals behind closed doors.  The FOIA has made public service a lot less rewarding.  Privatization offers a way to avoid public scrutiny.  That it doesn't provide better and more efficient service is now abundantly clear.  But, that was never the objective.  The private corporation is the last bastion of autocracy.  (See evidence in the Obama Administration trying to recruit ISPs as spies).

People who want to be rulers don't appreciate government by the people catered to by public servants.


Margret Chase Smith said... (4.00 / 4)
"My creed is that public service must be more than doing a job efficiently and honestly. It must be a complete dedication to the people and to the nation with full recognition that every human being is entitled to courtesy and consideration, that constructive criticism is not only to be expected but sought, that smears are not only to be expected but fought, that honor is to be earned but not bought."
It's sad to see how far the Republicans have turned from this basic tenent of public service. We must elect Paul Hodes and Annie Kuster and keep N.H. Blue  

"THE WELFARE OF EACH OF US IS DEPENDENT FUNDAMENTALLY ON THE WELFARE OF ALL OF US." Teddy Roosevelt


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox