About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Sometimes, You Have To Choose

by: Douglas E. Lindner

Thu Sep 09, 2010 at 23:49:49 PM EDT


(Part below the fold. - promoted by Dean Barker)

I've met both Kuster and Swett and heard each of them speak on several occasions in various settings.  I've had the chance to ask questions.  I think they're both smart and they're both good people, they both have supporters who I like and respect as people and as activists, and I'll be happy to support either one in the general election.  In the spirit of party unity and because I live in the 1st District, I haven't publicly supported either candidate.

But sometimes, you have to choose.

Douglas E. Lindner :: Sometimes, You Have To Choose

Sometimes one side is correct and the other side is wrong.  It's not always the same side.  Moses did not come down from Mount Sinai indicating a point along the ideological spectrum, and I reject the implication that pushing anything other than the ideological median makes one wrong. (Click for Dean's transcription of a portion of the Ann McLane Kuster-Katrina Swett debate)  If, as a well-informed person, the median is where you happen to come down on issues, I respect that.  If, as a well-informed person, the right wing is where you happen to come down on issues, I respect that too (I'll argue endlessly, but I respect it).  However, it seems most militantly moderate holders and seekers of major office are simply triangulating, hedging on any effort to take any controversial action.  I don't respect the idea that the lowest common denominator is the solution to our problems.

There's nothing sacred about splitting the ideological baby.  Sometimes, you have to choose.

So my neutrality ends now.  I've felt privately for some time that Kuster seems more interested in the details of the issues and in the work of winning this election, but I've been willing to allow for the possibility that Swett is simply holding her cards closer.  I've now been convinced otherwise.  I want leaders who are thinking about the issues, not the spectrum.

I encourage 2nd District voters to vote for Ann McLane Kuster.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Very Well Thought-Out Analysis, Doug (4.00 / 3)
You have taken a good look at each of these very good people, and made your call.  And by your presentation it sounds like you were torn, and the choice was tough to make.  I see either Katrina Swett, who I admire for her (and Dick's) many years of progressive leadership and Democratic Party involvement, and Ann Kuster, whom I respect for her depth and intelligence, as great choices.  

I just hope that whomever is the "runner-up" on Tuesday immediately gets behind the nominee.  She should become a co-chair of the nominee's campaign, pull together their campaign teams, and go on to Smash Bass.

I have the luxury of not having to choose, since I can vote this coming Tuesday for the excellent Congressperson we have in Carol Shea-Porter.  I have a similar dilemma as you, however -- we have 8 Democratic candidates running for the 7 State Legislative nominations in the Portsmouth-Newington district.  

I like them all, but there's a line on the ballot that says, "Vote for not more than 7."  On the ballot are the best House Speaker we've ever had, the longest-serving woman in the NH House, and tremendous advocates for health care, environment, education, diversity, and child care.

Every dilemma has a solution, however, and I HAVE figured out a way to vote for them all!


Vermont's Dem Gov Candidates (4.00 / 2)
Are setting a great example (touring the state together while the recount is going on) and talking about the Dem agenda vs Dubie's Agenda.

While I hope they have their Nom very soon, its a great example of Party over Person.

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


[ Parent ]
VT for Dubie! Who knew ? n/t (4.00 / 2)


We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

[ Parent ]
Thanks for your thoughtful approach... (4.00 / 1)
Thanks for your thoughtful opinion Doug. While we disagree on your conclusion, I appreciate your approach to the decision. I would though take exception to the following statement:


However, it seems most militantly moderate holders and seekers of major office are simply triangulating, hedging on any effort to take any controversial action.  I don't respect the idea that the lowest common denominator is the solution to our problems.


There are certainly politicians who fit your statement. However, I believe that it is a disservice to us, our party and the country to assume that moderates are simply afraid to take a principled stand.

Moderate is a stand in its own right. There are moderates in both parties and among undeclareds. I look no further than my home state of Mass. at Paul Tsongas to see a principled moderate. He was not the exception.

Actually the statement:

There is nothing in the middle of the road except yellow lines and dead skunks
is a measure of Republicans rush to self destruction by "cleansing" their own party.


If Democrats are to remain the Big Tent party, as I believe we are, we must allow that moderates have a legitimate point, even though we may not agree with it.


Thanks again for your thoughtful approach and I will now get off my soap box, before I fall off...

"Never doubt that a small group of dedicated people can change the world...it's all that ever has."
~Margaret Mead


Yes and no (0.00 / 0)
If Democrats are to remain the Big Tent party, as I believe we are, we must allow that moderates have a legitimate point, even though we may not agree with it.

Yes, absolutely.

Moderate is a stand in its own right.

No. Stands are defined by issues and policies, not labels.



[ Parent ]
I'm not against moderates in general. It's healthy to have a middle. (4.00 / 2)
What I'm against is the idea that one's position on an issue should be defined by placing oneself halfway between Bernie Sanders and Jim DeMint.  There's nothing sacred about centrism for the sake of centrism.  I'm extremely skeptical of pols who believe in a deus ex medio.

I respect people whose positions place them near the center--and for the record, I respect you, John.  What I don't respect is, for example, the time Senators Collins, Snowe, and Nelson decided they would vote for the Recovery Act, but only if it were a hundred billion dollars smaller than whatever it might otherwise have been.  For another example, Senator Lieberman coming to oppose his own proposal for medicare expansion as a part of healthcare reform and pointedly admitting he changed his mind because he learned that Congressman Anthony Weiner was for it.

--
"Act as if ye have faith and faith shall be given to you." -Aaron Sorkin


[ Parent ]
I am against fake moderates (4.00 / 1)
By her continued strong and vocal support of Joe Lieberman in the '06 CT Senate race after he had been defeated in a Democratic Primary by Ned Lamont, Katrina showed no regard for the wishes of the electorate. When she loses on Tuesday will she pledge not to run as an independent who knows better than the State's Democratic primary voters?

It was a very similar race...Lieberman was beaten by Lamont over support for Bush policies in Iraq. Lamont was against the War. So is/was Annie. Katrina was quoted supporting Bush's policies invasion of Iraq as a "very sophisticated and smart approach" in the Nashua Telegraph 10/9/02. It makes my question above relevant, and redolent of '06.

Is her Centrism radical ? So important that it is bigger than party? Seemed so in that case, for sure. At the time, before Lieberman ran as an independent, Dick told me to my face that he was not sure "this is my Democratic Party anymore'. Joe ran outside the Party as an independent with the Swett's blessing and continued support.

Now the campaign, through debate talking points and hit mail has tried to paint Annie as a "real progressive", something to be scorned in a turn back the clock election.

Is this the DLC in 1991 talking about to get the White house back by co-opting Republican positions ? No the NH version is co-opting about the Swetts Democrats. Shame on you!

When you endeavor to cast yourselves as the center of the NH Democratic Party,it has to be based on something relevant in 2010. Your campaign is so 1992. That was then. Fully one third of the electorate voting next week, did not live or vote in NH in 2000.
Good luck with your 'punch the hippie' style.

BTW, Dean deserves the Pulitzer for that line alone.

See you Tuesday at the Bow Polls. I'll be there all day.

We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.


[ Parent ]
*should have said (0.00 / 0)
No the NH version is about the Swetts co-opting Democrats.

We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

[ Parent ]
Point of clarification (4.00 / 4)
Neither candidate could run as a independent after Tuesday as it is about 12 weeks too late to file.

Three more days.




"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


[ Parent ]
could always be a write in n/t (0.00 / 0)


We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

[ Parent ]
Real World, Jon n/t (4.00 / 1)




"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


[ Parent ]
Right in ? :) n/t (0.00 / 0)


We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

[ Parent ]
I like that rule. (4.00 / 1)
I have no problem with candidates who run as independents, but that's a decision to make when becoming a candidate.  Committing to a party's primary and seeking its nomination is committing to respect the party's primary voters in their decision about who to nominate.

--
"Act as if ye have faith and faith shall be given to you." -Aaron Sorkin


[ Parent ]
whom n/t (4.00 / 1)


We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

[ Parent ]
On Some Issues, Bass is to the Left of Swett (0.00 / 1)
Reproductive rights

The war in Afghanistan

Hers is not a moderate position.  


No'm Sayn?


? (4.00 / 4)
Bass would vote for Boehner for speaker. That means Bass is to the right of all Democrats on all issues.

Period.



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


[ Parent ]
Wrong -- and Blatantly Untrue (4.00 / 1)
I am not going to defend what Katrina said in the debate.  It is bad political strategy.  And, more importantly, it is not true.

I cannot think of a single position where Katrina Swett is to the right of Barack Obama, much less Charlie Bass.  (She is to the left of the President on several issues, including gun control and human rights as a key component of US foreign policy.)  Since the President is no moderate, Katrina Swett isn't either.

On choice, Katrina is to the left of Charlie on federal funding and stem cell research.  She attacked him on these issues in the 2002 campaign.

Everyone is having their fun, and I can't complain -- after all, Katrina asked for it.  But I draw the line at false garbage like your comment.  Which deserves a TR.


[ Parent ]
Yes and No (0.00 / 0)
Kathy's right when it comes to Boehner. Charlie is Mr. Go-Along-to-Get-Along, no question.

But on choice, Katrina is against federal funding.
And Charlie is less of a hawk on Afg than KS.

But the Boehner thing...that does top it all.  

No'm Sayn?


[ Parent ]
Wrong (4.00 / 1)
Katrina is for federal funding.  She always has been for federal funding.  Katrina campaigned against the Hyde Amendment in 2002, and opposed the Stupak Amendment from Day 1 last year.  

You don't know what the hell you're talking about.  


[ Parent ]
My Ears Don't Lie, DD (0.00 / 0)
If you've never heard your candidate say she does not support federal funding, you are in a very small group.

All the pro-choice groups have heard her on this, as have my own ears.

 

No'm Sayn?


[ Parent ]
Your Ears DO Lie, Burt (4.00 / 1)
Saying it over and over again doesn't make it true.  It just makes it a bigger lie.

Here is Katrina's statement on Stupak from last December:

"...the trepidation comes from the Stupak amendment which, much to my dismay, was adopted as part of the bill passed by the House. The effect of the Stupak amendment would be to significantly curtail women's access to health care coverage for the full range of reproductive services. As someone who is pro-choice..."

http://www.bluehampshire.com/s...

And her position on Hyde has never wavered, either.


[ Parent ]
President Obama is a moderate. (0.00 / 0)
The kind of moderate who believes in things, but a moderate nonetheless.

--
"Act as if ye have faith and faith shall be given to you." -Aaron Sorkin


[ Parent ]
Does This Mean (4.00 / 1)
that a "moderate" is someone who cares less about getting party principles converted into legislation than he does about the appearance of enjoying support from both parties?  I think your description of Ms Swett is accurate, but I also perceive President Obama as too much (so far) of a triangulator rather than a principled leader.

"Moderate" can be a handy way to describe someone who thinks a middle way between the extreme positions is more doable, or it can be a description of someone who is afraid to take the more ideological position.


[ Parent ]
He has some of that, but mostly, he's the other kind of moderate: (0.00 / 0)
He also stands up for minorities (like Muslims) when nobody else will. (left)

He also escalated the war in Afghanistan when his party was against it. (right)

Against the advice of all of his closest advisors, he pushed for a comprehensive healthcare reform bill, not a series of smaller bills. (left)

He's dragging his feet on ending many of the myriad Bush-era civil liberties abuses. (right)

For the first time, an American President is convening summits of world leaders and getting serious about reducing and eliminating nuclear weapons worldwide--Presidents like Reagan were all talk on that. (left)

--
"Act as if ye have faith and faith shall be given to you." -Aaron Sorkin


[ Parent ]
Adding: (0.00 / 0)
I'm not necessarily saying Swett is the next Ben Nelson; I'm saying she doesn't talk enough about the issues for me to be convinced that her rhetorical triangulating in that debate is just rhetoric.  And frankly, even if it is just rhetoric, I think that rhetoric is harmful to the political zeitgeist.

That said, Katrina Swett is a good Democrat who I will full-throatedly support if she wins the nomination; I have enormous respect for her human rights efforts and for her father's and husband's tenures in Congress.

--
"Act as if ye have faith and faith shall be given to you." -Aaron Sorkin


[ Parent ]
sweet seasons (0.00 / 0)
sometimes you win sometimes you lose



We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox