Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
I've met both Kuster and Swett and heard each of them speak on several occasions in various settings. I've had the chance to ask questions. I think they're both smart and they're both good people, they both have supporters who I like and respect as people and as activists, and I'll be happy to support either one in the general election. In the spirit of party unity and because I live in the 1st District, I haven't publicly supported either candidate.
Sometimes one side is correct and the other side is wrong. It's not always the same side. Moses did not come down from Mount Sinai indicating a point along the ideological spectrum, and I reject the implication that pushing anything other than the ideological median makes one wrong. (Click for Dean's transcription of a portion of the Ann McLane Kuster-Katrina Swett debate) If, as a well-informed person, the median is where you happen to come down on issues, I respect that. If, as a well-informed person, the right wing is where you happen to come down on issues, I respect that too (I'll argue endlessly, but I respect it). However, it seems most militantly moderate holders and seekers of major office are simply triangulating, hedging on any effort to take any controversial action. I don't respect the idea that the lowest common denominator is the solution to our problems.
There's nothing sacred about splitting the ideological baby. Sometimes, you have to choose.
So my neutrality ends now. I've felt privately for some time that Kuster seems more interested in the details of the issues and in the work of winning this election, but I've been willing to allow for the possibility that Swett is simply holding her cards closer. I've now been convinced otherwise. I want leaders who are thinking about the issues, not the spectrum.
I encourage 2nd District voters to vote for Ann McLane Kuster.