Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
I can hardly believe that a sitting state representative would name his own bill the "Don't Touch My Junk" bill, but I can less believe the editors of the UL would have put that headline there themselves.
Andrew Manuse (R-Derry) wrote an op-ed in the UL titled: Why I sponsored the TSA "don't touch my junk" bill. Here is part of the case he makes for the bill.(bold mine)
Remember, the TSA is not enforcing federal law. It is only enforcing an unconstitutional agency policy. We can tell them to stop. In reality, there is nothing the TSA can do to stop us from putting one of their agents' names on our sex offender registry. And thus, we chose this approach because it is the only thing we can do to send the message to Washington that the abuses of the TSA have got to stop, and they have to stop now.
What does Rep Manuse think should be done instead?
I think before any kind of enhanced screening is conducted, the TSA must conduct behavioral profiling and should consider using some bomb-sniffing dogs as well. If these methods result in some level of articulable suspicion, I think the next step is to use interrogation methods to further determine the level of threat.
Now I also question the full body scans, etc. in the wake of the "underwear bomber". But I am not a security expert. Surely there are other ways to voice skepticism about this policy than to pass a state law turning airport security agents into sex offenders, and instituting airport interrogation rooms.