About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Sununu Fils on Voter ID - in the Globe

by: susanthe

Wed Aug 10, 2011 at 04:00:00 AM EDT


On Monday, regular contributor John E. Sununu, had an op-ed in the Boston Globe. The op-ed was about NH's voter ID bill.

IN 2003, a University of New Hampshire poll asked respondents if they thought their vote was counted accurately. Compared to other states, New Hampshire polled exceptionally high. Elections are complex; there is no simple formula for capturing integrity in balloting rules. But if the recipe for the Granite State's success were boiled down to two words, they would be "Bill Gardner.''

That was as close as he got to even mentioning voter fraud. He never bothers to explain why we need a voter ID law in NH.  

susanthe :: Sununu Fils on Voter ID - in the Globe
For someone who has held elected office for 35 years, New Hampshire's Secretary of State is remarkably uninterested in publicity. A Democrat, he was first elected in 1976 when the state House handed him a surprise victory over an old-guard Republican. Every two years since, however, legislatures led by both Republicans and Democrats have found at least one thing they agree on: Gardner's unparalleled stewardship of the office.

The subtext seems to be that since Republicans and Democrats agree on Bill Gardner, that means we should agree on the need for Voter ID.

So when Gardner voiced concerns about a voter identification law moving through the New Hampshire legislature, both sides of the aisle took note. Governor Lynch vetoed the bill, but with 27 states now requiring voters to show ID at the polls, this is an issue whose time has come. On its face, voter ID adds a level of integrity to the system. If ID is required to board a plane or cash a check, why not to verify one's status on election day?

Yep, there's that subtext again. John Jr. never explains why we need a voter ID law, never mentions the fact that the bill was vetoed by Governor Lynch, never mentions the substantial opposition to the bill - he just presents it as an inevitability.

In case any of you good folks wish to counter JohnE's selective view of the issue:

Emailletter@globe.com
Fax617.929.2098
Regular mail Letters to the Editor
Boston Globe
P.O. Box 55819
Boston, MA
02205-5819

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
See, it's all about "status" with conservatives. Status is a position which (4.00 / 1)
is socially assigned -- i.e. provides an opportunity for people to decide another's worth. It is segregation by another name, an effort to designate some people more important than others, on the basis of not what they do, but who they are.
Universal suffrage is obnoxious to the status-seekers because it is universal. Age restrictions and residency requirements do not placate because they don't provide an opportunity to discriminate.

I think the reason the issue isn't framed this way is because the victims of the segregationist impulse somewhat perversely also prefer to see the flaw in themselves, rather than define the behavior as the unwarranted aggression it is. People prefer to have a reason for being attacked, rather than accept that some humans simply don't like other humans unless they can put them down. We know that segregationists are acting out of a sense of insecurity but are at a loss how to "cure" it.  So, we decide we've done something to piss them off and hope they'll be satisfied.  But, of course, they never are.  Because a subservient population can't be relied on to stay that way. The call of liberty is too strong. Which is why restrictions eventually go too far and insurrection eventually results, validating, ironically, that the insecure were right to be insecure all along.



Enough with the ridiculous false equivalencies. (4.00 / 5)
Boarding a plane is not a Constitutionally-guaranteed right.  Neither is opening a checking account (which is another example they frequently use).

He Does Say (0.00 / 0)
Gov Lynch vetoes the bill but doesn't say why the Governor did so.

I would be ok with requiring ID but the state would have to offer non-driver ID's to every voter at the states cost, and not require the voters go to the DMV or other state office to get one, they would have to offer them at Town Hall on Election Day.  And with the DOT planning to cut their snow plowing this winter the State doesn't have the millions of dollars this would require right now.  Should be a total non-issue.


His path may be the most direct but ultimately he gets to the right end point. (4.00 / 2)

Ultimately this is an op-ed against the voter id bill that the Governor vetoed and it should be very helpful in convincing the GOP Senators who are currently wavering to uphold the veto. I intend to send a copy of this to Jack Barnes (my Senator) and would encourage everyone who lives in a district with a GOP Senator to do the same.

We can defeat the extremist anti-voter ID bill, but we need to act now and we need some GOP help in doing so, so I have to welcome this op-ed and thank Mr. Sununu for writing it.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  


oops -- should be "his path may NOT be the most direct" (0.00 / 0)


"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

[ Parent ]
you need some rest and relaxation Paul n/t (0.00 / 0)


note to close readers: this might be sarcastic so think twice before reading to candidates for use in their attacks on each other

[ Parent ]
If you can find the votes to sustain the veto without GOP senators, you will win the Nobel Prize for Mathematics. (4.00 / 2)

Until that happens, it is a very good thing that the Sununus are giving cover to those Senators who might go against the O'Brien extremists.

I dont quite grasp the utility of attacking someone for agreeing with us on a criti9cal issue of fair elections.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  


[ Parent ]
talking about your oops...not critisizning anything else n/t (0.00 / 0)


note to close readers: this might be sarcastic so think twice before reading to candidates for use in their attacks on each other

[ Parent ]
double oops! (3.00 / 1)


"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

[ Parent ]
that's a creative interpretation (0.00 / 0)
at best.

Bottom line - he's advocating for Voter ID.  


[ Parent ]
He's advocating sustaining the veto and in the future working for a different solutionl (3.50 / 2)

Without getting too much in the weeds,the house and the senate election law committees were moving toward a  compromise which would have seen and id requirement, but be set up in such a manner that no one would be turned away from the polls for lack of an id. (people without id's would be photographed for purposes of an election data base for reference in future elections).

While one might not see the need for any ID, this seemed to be something that the GOP majority could accept for enforcement purposes and the Democrats and progressive groups working on it could accept because no one would be denied the right to vote and there would be no provisional ballots (most of which are never counted). The photo database would have likely driven some libertarians crazy, but that's a small price to pay for keeping the right to vote for all :}.

At the last minute , in the conference committee stage, O'Brien came in and literally forced the house members to scuttle the compromise and vote for what is easily the worst voter ID bill in the country.

So Sununu in the first instance is saying that the veto should be upheld. This is the only vote scheduled. If the veto is upheld, then presumably someone will re-introduce the compromise bill in the next session and we can discuss its merits then. I for one will most likely join him in supporting the compromise,but for now, we should all welcome his support in the override.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  


[ Parent ]
Astute commentary (4.00 / 2)
Susan - I think you're right on the money with your analysis of the subtext here and while Bill Gardner does support photo ID, his support is ridden with so many caveats that I'm not sure how any one can point to it as an example of support for the bill.

As a progressive community we need to come up with a better way to cut through the spin that "You need ID to buy booze, so you should to vote too." Pointing out that boarding a plane and buying age-restricted items are privileges while voting is a constitutional right somehow isn't getting through...

Political Campaign Manager at Democracy for America


Sununu's position (4.00 / 3)
I hope people will read the whole op-ed. Sununu is supporting the Governor's veto of SB129.  


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox