About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

9 Comments: HACW

by: elwood

Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 18:14:41 PM EDT


(I'll use this "promotion text" to announce, with a very happy heart, that elwood is returning to us as a "front page" writer. - promoted by Dean Barker)

That is, Hello Again, Cruel World.

Back in November 2007 - when the Democratic Senate unanimously colluded to ensure Michael Mukasey would become Attorney General, approving 'no filibuster' rules by unanimous consent - I said here that I was leaving the Democratic Party. More precisely I said that it had "spit me out" by this action. I intended to re-register as Undeclared on my way out of the voting booth in the January primary.

I'm back - or rather, I never actually left.

It certainly isn't because Michael Mukasey has proven me wrong in his tenure thus far. He has refused to launch an independent investigation of the US Attorney firings and he has refused to act on the House Contempt of Congress citations of Miers and Bolten. Both of these issues were on the radar in November - but the Senate didn't demand a commitment on them before confirmation. (All the Democratic Senators were complicit in this: Clinton and Obama, but also Dodd, Biden, Feingold, and Bernie Sanders.)

So, why am I still a Democrat? Disjoint observations below the fold.

elwood :: 9 Comments: HACW
  1. Logistical: I was wrong about election procedures. The only people who can vote then become Undeclared on primary day are the people who walked in as Undeclared and enrolled in a party by voting. The "back to undeclared" table is only for them.  To leave the Party would mean a trip down to City Hall for me - and I didn't get around to it.
  2. Proximate cause:  The House Democrats - and maybe even some clever Senators - are actually taking a stand on FISA. They have blocked telecom immunity (which is not about protecting the phone companies, but about preventing exposure of the Administration's crimes). They did this despite "soft on terror" cries from the Administration and polls that say they could lose some voters and not gain others with this vote on principle. The fight isn't over and some House members may still get cold feet (though both Hodes and Shea Porter have never wavered on this). But we have actually seen the House take an important stand that campaign aides may have warned against.
  3. Process of elimination: I'm drawn to politics at both ideological and practical levels. There is nothing in the ideology of twenty-first century Republicanism for me. The renunciation of short- and medium-term practicality by third-party movements rules them out for me. That leaves the Democrats.
  4. Political theory: "Voting with your feet" is not the only way - and maybe not the most effective way - of fixing things. Schools and roads are generally good - and they are generally good - because we can't easily escape them and we demand quality. Having decided that there are no better choices among political parties for me, that logic tells me to engage in the Democratic Party despite its flaws and work to improve its operation. (Cue Leonard Cohen: "They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom, for trying to change the system from within...")
  5. My misplaced diagnosis. The cowardice of the Mukasey vote is just another example of Our Stupid Politics. IMO that stupidity is only partly related to party and ideology.  Blaming the Democratic Party for it is a bit like blaming the Red Sox for the Designated Hitter rule. Sure, they are complicit - but they don't have the power to change the rule on their own. Nor does the Democratic Party have the power to unilaterally fix our political culture: voter behavior and media laziness must change too.
  6. Solidarity. We crusty old Yankees confront a certain duality all the time: Rugged Individualism versus Community. But even the most autonomous of us must recognize strength in numbers and heed Ben Franklin's "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
  7. Local integrity. It was the cowardice and complicity of our Senate Democrats that drove me out - but active Party membership is really a bottom-up affair. Like the Catholic who is comfortable in the local parish, less comfortable with the Bishop and still less so with the Curia and Pope, I'm a Democrat who can cheer most of our local representatives who gave us civil unions and  kindergarten while tolerating the ones who have moved on up.
  8. Sheer cussedness. What kind of a wimp was I, to walk out and let the two-faced smooth-talkers in the U.S. Senate take over my Party?  Not without a fight, guys.
  9. Urgency. This election will either institutionalize the neoconservative coup and its New American Empire or begin the slow and painful process of reclaiming our country and our Constitution.  That is the stark choice between John McCain and either of our potential candidates.  This is by far the most important election of my lifetime. That amplifies all the factors above.
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
9 Comments: HACW | 16 comments
Welcome back (0.00 / 0)
You can't change the system by throwing stones at windows from the outside.  Being a member of the Democratic Party means this is your party as much as anybody else's.  You don't have to be a Harry Reid Democrat or a John Lynch Democrat.  You can be an Elwood Democrat.

Meanwhile, with the departure of Mike Caulfield, and the elimination of your motivation to resign as a front-pager, now seems a good time for you to be restored to that.

--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


It seems Dean agrees with me. (0.00 / 0)
Whoever maintains the format these days (Mike? Dean?), elwood should be reinserted into the Masthead.

--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


[ Parent ]
Slow down, speedy Petey! (0.00 / 0)
Some of us can't type that fast after a long day of actual work! I'm getting there...  :-)

birch, finch, beech

[ Parent ]
Sorry, Dean, some of us had the day off today. (4.00 / 1)


--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


[ Parent ]
I was just thinking the other day... (4.00 / 1)
rather than FP'ing everything Elwood writes we should get him back on the FP.

Welcome back Elwood.

(FP'ing sort of sounds like a swear word...)

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


I can think of words far more offensive than FP'ing (0.00 / 0)
Words like "Hannity".

--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


[ Parent ]
I apologize for that. (0.00 / 0)
If you feel the need to troll-rate me for the profanity, I'll understand.

--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


[ Parent ]
"Every time I try to get out, they keep pullin' me back in." (4.00 / 3)
http://www.bluehampshire.com/s...

Michael Corleone had it right.  Welcome back, Elwood!

Your favorite halfwit (see November link above),
Dartmouth Dem


welcome back (4.00 / 1)

while the rest undoubtedly have validity, reason number 8 works for me.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

As Victor said to Rick... (4.00 / 2)
Welcome back to the fight. This time I know our side will win.

Energy and persistence conquer all things.


Benjamin Franklin


 


Welcome back (4.00 / 1)
2, 4, 6, 8, 9 ... pretty much all of 'em.

I guess I'll never get to use my long-sheathed rhetorical sword:
"Then again, Elwood did leave the party after the primary, so ... " [insert whatever point I wanted to make, since the universe had gone out of alignment and anything was possible.]

It was sort of like Nixon went to China, in a Democratic progressive way.

Welcome back!


welcome back elwood (4.00 / 1)
well, kinda back - since you never left.

I, too, have contemplated leaving the party - and I can't say that I won't at some point in the future. I don't happen to buy into the propaganda about third parties - sometime in the near soon, I predict one will come together and be a force to be reckoned with.

Till then, I live in NH - which has only recently become a 2 party state. That's the framework I have to work within right now.  

member of the professional left  


We should have a discussion about third parties (0.00 / 0)
Or maybe: the replacement of a "major" party. The Republicans replaced the Whigs in the 1850s - 1860: can that still happen? If not, is it ossification? If so, how - starting at local / state levels, or with a national campaign?

[ Parent ]
3rd Party (4.00 / 1)
I've been having a limited off-line discussion about this topic vis-a-vis Religion (where there are hundreds of "parties") and Gender Identity (which is not necessarily a binary choice) with a friend.

I was thinking about in from a Caulfield "Sides Matter" perspective... maybe we don't have enough sides?

Could be a good discussion.

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


[ Parent ]
We don't have enough sides. (0.00 / 0)
Nobody should ever have to vote against, and that happens too often.  The Republican Party should not be replaced, it should divide into three parties: an evangelical party, a so-called "small government" party, and a hawkish party.

--
"Don't lose your grip on the dreams of the past; you must fight just to keep them alive!"

@DougLindner


[ Parent ]
Glad you're back, in both senses. (0.00 / 0)
We need you.

9 Comments: HACW | 16 comments

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox