About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

A Little Courage

by: Dean Barker

Wed May 20, 2009 at 22:05:16 PM EDT


Here's the thing.

The civil right of marriage equality isn't about the NH House, or the NH Senate, or Governor Lynch.

Ten years from now almost no one will know or care to know about the actors who made this freedom possible in the Live Free or Die state. And that's a beautiful thing, in my opinion.

So I'm asking as earnestly as I can tonight, for you, Public Servant, to stop for a moment and consider what you have done about marriage equality so far and what you need to do to make it a reality.  I'm asking you to put aside thinking about your next election, or your quid pro quo.

What I'm looking for is a little courage.

Governor Lynch, have the courage to know that this bill has been worked over multiple times already, that in whatever detail it arrives to you in two weeks, it's going to be worthy of your signature because it will grant a basic civil right to some of your citizens whom you have an obligation to serve.  Think about them first.

Democratic Senators, have the courage to recognize that the House is a much bigger place than your club, and it may take them some time, and a little bit of different wording, to get to where you ended up today.  Have the courage to meet them there for a cause much bigger than yourself.  

Democratic House Reps, have the courage to show up for the vote the next time this gets worked out.  Have the courage to look into your heart and your duty of service to see the essential civic morality of this legislation.  Have the courage to explain your position to your constituents sincerely.

Those House Reps seeking higher office who did not vote today, have the courage to tell us why you didn't, and what you will do in the next two weeks to make amends for that.  Know that your candidacies are DOA in the eyes of many until we see some of that courage, even if it's the courage to tell us why you stand against marriage equality. (UPDATE: Please read Rep. DeJoie's detailed response in the comment thread.)

House Republicans who have voted before and yet again today for this freedom, have the courage to withstand once again the pressure from within your own party and from those with insincere agendas.  And thank you for your continued bravery.

Tireless activists and advocates of marriage equality here in New Hampshire and out-of-state, have the courage not to make the perfect the enemy of the good.

Dear Public Servant, and with all due respect: this legislation is not about you, and it's not about me.  But if enacted into law, it will be about a state that offers a greater promise of freedom to a greater number of its citizens than it has before.  It will make New Hampshire a leader in the United States in the cause of equal opportunity and liberty.

If we can put aside our vanity and we put our fellow citizens front and center, and have a little courage, we not only can do this, but we will do it.

Dean Barker :: A Little Courage
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A Little Courage | 13 comments
It's mostly integrity, not courage (4.00 / 7)
New Hampshire doesn't vote people out of office for supporting equality.

The grassroots revolt after civil unions was the biggest non-event since Y2K.


The moderate republicans who were decimated after voting for an income tax during the second Shaheen term might disagree. (4.00 / 2)
But that was in a GOP primary, so the general point holds true for November elections. I think that in matters that really will effect the lives of people across the board -- like taxes--- there is always a danger of lasting and increasing resentments that can be dangerous to incumbents.

But in areas like equal marriage, it seems that when people initially opposed see that it literally has no bad effects on their lives, they cease to get worked up about it long before the next election and there is rarely any retribution for votes in the legislature.

So Elwood is right, legislators, and Democratic ones in particular, dont have to dig too deep in their bag of courage to support marriage rights.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  


[ Parent ]
the above would apply to governors also of course. (4.00 / 2)


"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

[ Parent ]
I'm not saying NO vote is courageous or risky. (4.00 / 1)
I'm saying the marriage equality issue is not risky and doesn't demand great courage. Most of the people who oppose it wouldn't have voted for a Democrat; most of the remainder recognize that reasonable people can disagree.

[ Parent ]
Why I Didn't Vote (4.00 / 11)
A Little Courage is a great name for this diary. What happened yesterday on the Marriage Equality vote had a little to do with courage, but a lot to do with grandstanding.

My reason for not being at the session is actually neither of these. I was absent from session because I took my son to CHaD in Lebanon for an urgent medical appointment. It caused me great distress to miss this vote, however, as a father, my son needed me to care for him.

I had initially notified the House that I would not be in attendance at yesterday's session. When it became clear that HB73, including changes requested by the Governor, would be before the House, I attended the morning session. In doing this, I fully expected that HB73 would be before us first thing in the morning. It was yesterday morning, when I spoke with Jim Splaine, that I realized HB 73 would not make it to the House until after lunch. I needed to leave Concord by 1 PM to be at CHaD; the House did not reconvene after lunch until 1:45 PM.

To Dean's question of "what have you done and what will you do"...I have voted for Marriage Equality several times this session, and I intend to continue voting for Marriage Equality. I have spoken with Jim Splaine numerous times and offered my assistance in any way that he felt would be helpful. Since Jim has been leading the debate, I respected his ability to manage the debate and followed his lead.

I have also responded to each constituent who has emailed me, those in support of Marriage Equality and those opposed to Marriage Equality. I responded to each email explaining that I support Marriage Equality as a matter of equal rights. Many constituents were unhappy with my response, but protecting the rights of minorities is always the right thing to do.

I wrote:

English settlers first came to America seeking fredom of expression  and religion. Nearly 400 years later, their descendents continue to fight for equality and freedom of expression. The signs affecting my ancestors "Irish Need Not Apply" and the signs affecting other minorities "coloreds only" were tolerated once. When intolerance of these beliefs grew, the response has been "it is not time" or "people are not ready". So it comes as little surprise when gay men and women seek the freedom to express their love and commitment to the adult of their choice, the response becomes "it is not time", "society is not ready".

As a society, we are rarely "ready" for any change. Overcoming the inertia of society is difficult, but necessary. One of the most important responsibilities of a legislative body, is to ensure the rights of any minority. In this case, there are many citizens who do not have the option of marrying the person of their choosing.In righting this injustice, it is possible to enahnce the rights of the minority, without infringing on the rights of the majority. It is indeed rare that both objectives can be accomplished. Therefore, I see no other conclusion except to pass Marriage Equality and remove existing inequities.

I believe that those Representatives who have framed this debate, Splaine, Pierce, Butler have presented a compelling case for passing Marriage Equality. I do not believe that injecting myself publicly into this debate now appears to be anymore than pandering, which is why I have not issued public statements. If I am asked to by the debate organizers, I will speak publicly in support of Marriage Equality. I will continue lobbying legislators to support Marriage Equality. If anyone has ideas about other things that should be done, I am happy to talk.  

"Never doubt that a small group of dedicated people can change the world...it's all that ever has."
~Margaret Mead


thank you (0.00 / 0)
as a medical student who might one day be pediatrician, i very well understand your situation and would like to thank you again for your support. please keep up the hard work. and i hope your son is better now.

[ Parent ]
John DeJoie Has Helped Us (4.00 / 3)
John DeJoie has helped us every step of the way since the first critical votes two months ago on House Bill 436.  Everything he says in his comment is accurate, and when we talked on Wednesday morning on the House floor he told me about his need to leave at 1:00 PM.  I told him there is no greater priority than family, and fully understood his need to be with his 14 year old son.  It must have been tough on his son to undergo his tests, and John was being a good Dad.

Interestingly, John also said to me that it would be great distress to him if he was the deciding vote.  

I know John will continue helping our cause and will be there to help us as we continue working for House Bill 73.  Our thoughts also should go to his son.  Remember, this is all part of the process of legislating and one "pause" in the action, as Bishop Gene Robinson called it yesterday, does not a defeat make.  We will win this, thanks to work from John DeJoie and many others.


[ Parent ]
Vertebrae? (0.00 / 0)
For more years than I care to remember, I've been saying to prospective office holders: Voters are really hungry for candidates to stand up for what they believe in. They want candidates with backbone.
People would always tell me I was the only Democrat they voted for. When asked why, they'd consistently say, Well I don't always agree with you but at least I know where you stand.
Try it, it works. And you feel good too!

No'm Sayn?

I will concur (in the generic) (4.00 / 1)
This "backbone", of which you speak, please let me add. As a citizen/voter, a get miffed, even pissed, when a pol votes contrary to my opinion. In my smug sense of righteousness, I then take a wait and see attitude because I figure, right or wrong, that the pol knows something that I don't. This is odd since I tend to be cynical.

What drives me nuckin' futs are mealymouthed, waffle wimps that vote and then try to gather support from those they alienated.

I can respect someone that takes a position contrary to mine, if that opinion is based in logic. So, this "backbone" is a character trait that I look for in a leader.

Many folks that I have chatted with casually, have expressed a similar conviction.

www.KusterforCongress.com  


[ Parent ]
the legislature had a good turnout actually (0.00 / 0)
374 of 397 members voted on the main HB73 vote... and a 375th turned up for the last two procedural votes.

(I said "of 397" because there are two vacancies, and the 400th seat is held by the Speaker, who votes only if there is a tie.)

Some of these were "strategic" non-votes... where the member doesn't want to endorse his or her party's position but doesn't want to vote with the other side.  Instead of voting, sometimes a member will be convinced to "take a walk."  I see at least 3 Democrats who no-voted because they opted to go for a walk when the bill was voted on.  (There were at least 3 others, on the other hand, who walked last time and showed up this time.)

An surprising no-vote on the Republican side is the Deputy Minority Leader David Hess.    


Let's focus on the 12 (4.00 / 1)
who voted Yea before, and were absent yesterday.

One was appointed to a top state job and left the legislature; John DeJoie had a trip to the hospital. That leaves ten.

Why were they AWOL?


[ Parent ]
Let's Encourage Them To Be There... (0.00 / 0)
It really doesn't matter why they were not there yesterday.  "Yesterday" is a long time ago when June 3rd comes.  Let's focus on encouraging them, and other Democratic House supporters, to be there June 3rd, or whenever the Committee of Conference vote comes.  Let's think "next time," not what happened last time.  That's how we win this.  

[ Parent ]
Respectfully disagree. (0.00 / 0)
It does matter why they missed the vote. They owe the people of the state an explanation.

[ Parent ]
A Little Courage | 13 comments
Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox