About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Wall Street Just Doesn't Get IT

by: johndejoie

Tue Jan 12, 2010 at 09:01:53 AM EST


(This affects all of us. We need to stay informed. Thank you for the diary, John. - Jennnifer Daler.  (Bumped) - promoted by Dean Barker)

Wall Street financial services companies are preparing to pay out record year end bonuses (read WaPo article here), while Main Street continues to struggle with the loss of over 7 million jobs, record home foreclosures, record numbers of working families fighting to stay above water in paying for their home and monthly bills. Yet, Wall Street CEO's don't understand why Americans are so angry?!
johndejoie :: Wall Street Just Doesn't Get IT
After a significant contribution to the collapse of the American economy, tax payer funded bailouts and leveraging these bailouts and Fed policy changes, the financial services industry has seen record profits. It is no surprise since their losses were so great. But here is the question, if the banks benefited from taxpayer funded bailouts and rock bottom Fed rates, is it financial services CEO's who really deserve the bonuses or the American taxpayer?

The TARP, which I did not support, was intended to stabilize the US economy and to help homeowners on Main Street rewrite their mortgages so they would not lose their homes. But the large banks were in such a hurry to pay back TARP funds to remove executive compensation restrictions, that Main Street was left on the side of the road. Not only did Main Street not receive adequate assistance in rewriting their mortgages, the very same financial services companies raised credit card rates, some to levels that Pay Day lenders would be proud of. The financial services industry has clearly lost its moral compass.

The President's efforts to tax these companies to repay the entire tab for TARP is a short term effort that has merit. But we need to re-regulate the Wall Street financial services industry to provide needed protections for consumers, protections that Senators McCain and Sunnunu proudly fought to remove. We need to learn from the past year and a half so that we do not allow this crisis to happen again. We need to review the tax treatment of bonuses, both for executives and for the companies. We need to restore consumer protections, such as the recent Congressional changes to credit cards (which go into effect next month). Finally, we need to convene Congressional hearings to fully understand whether having a few large banks is truly in the economic interest of the US.

This debate, national versus regional banks, dates back to the early days of our federal government. Andrew Jackson fought against national banks because he was concerned of large banks having too much control over the US economy. The very situation we find ourselves in today. It is time to roll back some of the regulation that has made this possible. Banks that are "too big to fail" are not good economic policy and they clearly do not lead to good social policy. Just ask former Main Street homeowners.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Agreed (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for moving past (extremely justified) anger -- and proposing tangible solutions that will help to ensure that this deregulation-inspired catastrophe is never repeated on Wall Street.

I think the problem is one of control. (0.00 / 0)
Ever since the decoupling of money from a relatively scarce metal whose availability was able to be controlled by the mine owners and their friends in the financial community, the economic activity of world's people has been more difficult to control.
I should note, parenthetically, that the support for a free, automatic, self-regulating market is not sincere.  Or rather, markets that are free of government regulation are good because that makes them liable to manipulation by the financial class.
In any event, several strategies to secure control have been tried.  They ranged from excluding some populations (minorities and women) from financial participation to manipulating the nominal "cost" of money--i.e. access to it--by jiggling the interest rates.  What we eventually discovered is an unwelcome reality--that economies can be brought to a halt by restricting or sequestering the supply of money (a necessary lubricant of exchange and trade), but it's not possible to make it go faster or change direction that way.  And the idea that people who accumulate large sums of money are better equipped to determine how it is used has been totally debunked, if only because money is most easily accumulated by crooks.

Letting Wall Street monopolize the money supply was a big mistake.  That that was what they were up to didn't become clear until they were given more and did the same thing.

When governmental bodies collect taxes and then spend them on goods and services, that's a very direct process.  It's a process that's not appreciated by the financiers because it means they don't get their cut.  What the financiers prefer is loans and bonds that provide a steady trickle of income into their out-stretched hands.  That's what "trickle-down" really refers to.

The object of the financial class is simply to get a cut from whatever is spent on all public and private enterprise.  That's how they stay comfortable without doing any real work.


Wall St. Get$ it. (0.00 / 0)
Unless I missed something, bankers are in the business of making money, the more the better. Right now they are making out like bandits...it makes me mad. (in no small part because I am not sharing in the bounty)But it is easy to assess blame after the fact. It is harder to say exactly who is to blame. The people who were reaping gains of 30% a year in the market were not complaining till the party ended. The people buying houses with no money down were happy till the music stopped. We all have opur bete noirs but there is plenty of blame to go around.

I was just laughing at an announcement I received in today's mail for an Economic Forecast luncheon from the Concord Chamber of Commerce. Who can believe anyone who calls themselves a financial expert? None of these so called experts predicted the shitstorm of an economic collapse, until the day after Lehamn fell, 9/16/09. No one knew they were going to fall, or if they did they were not talking.

Yeah the system sucks, but frankly the politicians have done nothing to change that. It is not a good year to be an incumbent in either party, when voters can rightfully ask, 'who was watching the store?'and the answer is, the banking lobbyists.

It is interesting to see how they spend the money. The first benefit apparently is to start a recovery in the $3-5 million dollar segment for NY Real Estate.


http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/1...
Botox to vacations: Where bankers spend their bonuses

For just $17,500 a night you can rent Dunton Hot Springs, a private town in the Colorado mountains.
By Blake Ellis, contributing writerJanuary 12, 2010: 12:54 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Wall Street bankers are putting together their wish lists for 2010 -- and they're not holding back. After last year's dry spell, bonuses for top-level executives are expected to be sky high. Maybe even records.

Bankers at Goldman Sachs and Chase are anticipating bonuses of more than $500,000 a piece, on average, so they'll have plenty to spend.

Here's where they'll be putting the money.

Real Estate
: $3 million to $5 million

Buying apartments, second homes and vacation houses tops the list of ways bankers will most likely spend their money.

"Because these are big Wall Street bonuses, people are buying million-dollar-plus properties in the Hamptons, South Florida, skiing communities like Vail and Aspen, and Europe," said Milton Pedraza, CEO of the New York-based research firm the Luxury Institute.

Wall Street's big bonus culture
Of course, the first status residence is in Manhattan, and bankers are already starting to check out the goods in advance of their windfall. They're putting up huge down payments, which has helped the $3 million to $5 million sector of the city's housing market to rebound, said Pamela Liebman, CEO of New York-based brokerage firm Corcoran.

At the low end, they can score a three-bedroom, two bath condo right on Central Park or a tony address on Fifth Avenue. The more adventurous poet-at-heart bankers can tap out buying a five-story Queen Anne on the Upper West Side or head to the once-bohemian East Village for two joined buildings that boast an owner's triplex with a stunning terrace -- and income-generating apartments and businesses below.

Of course, many Wall Streeters already own their Manhattan dream homes, so they'll spend their extra money revamping their primary residences, Pedraza said.

A makeover by a well-respected interior decorator can run at least $150,000 -- but usually is more like 30% to 40% of the bonus. Think: Charlie Sheen hiring Daryl Hannah to give his new condo -- and life -- a high-rent makeover in the 1987 flick "Wall Street."

Or, there is always the extravagance of buying a condo on the new Utopia oceanliner. It's the high life on the high seas for just $24 million.



Annie 2012!

How about "The Obama Administration doesn't get IT?" (4.00 / 1)

That, IMO, is the question we need to ask. Why did the Obama administration choose Wall Street insiders for his cabinet and how has that compromised the change we voted for in 2008? We can complain about the banks and their greed, but let's keep in mind there are also individuals within the Obama administration that enable them.

My favorite, Matt Taibbi, spoke to Robert F Kennedy Jr. on his AAR and GoLeft program Ring of Fire. You really got to listen in because Taibbi, as always, knows his stuff. This is a guy I can trust. And don't worry Jen Daler, he doesn't swear and cuss this time : )

Seriously, take a listen. Wall Street is a problem for sure. But let's keep in mind those with political power also have a hand in this as well.  We can't ignore the elephant in the room and them off the hook because we're Democratic Party activists/bloggers.

PS: If you disagree with Taibbi, that's great. But keep it civil. That means you DD. No "are you smoking crack" comments would be appreciated.

Part I

Part II

Part III



I meant "leave them off the hook." n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox