About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Dems Have No Principles In Kevin Landrigan's World

by: Dean Barker

Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 08:55:05 AM EST


I think I've finally figured out why state media gatekeeper Kevin Landrigan's columns are so often irritating, and therefore, why I bother to read them less and less.

In Kevin Landrigan's world, Democrats have no principles and are guided by politics in every decision.

He never states this openly.  Rather, it's like a natural law in the Universe According to Kevin Landrigan, and as a result, all the ink in the column devoted to Democrats falls neatly into that assumption.

According to Kevin Landrigan, John Lynch opposes gambling because it locks up the Law and Order electoral constituency.  Carol Shea-Porter gives back Charlie Rangel money because she's scared of the NHGOP press releases; and when it gets explained to him that it was returned right after the Ethics Committee made their judgment on Rangel, the NHGOP still get the last word.

According to Kevin Landrigan, Maggie Hassan is targeting skyrocketing health care costs because it's allegedly going to be a tough year for a Democrat, and this will bring out the purple shirt people:

Republicans leaders insist this was a strategic blunder for "Maggie Care,'' as it's been lampooned coming on the heels of the volatile federal health care debate in Washington.

Yet, whatever becomes of this reform effort in the 2010 session, this is sound politics on at least one level.

All signs point to fiscal conservatives as energized in this election, and that could spell trouble for the Democratic majority.

Hassan's crusade will ensure those "Health Care for All'' activists, known for their purple T-shirts, are working overtime for her re-election, and for other Senate Democrats, as well.

(And, relatedly, did you notice in the passage above how in Kevin Landrigan's world, "fiscal conservative" is automatically not aligned with the Democratic party? Despite eight years of George W. Bush and his multi-trillion dollar war of choice, PayGo rules established by Democrats, and deficit-reducing health care reform that doesn't make donut holes?

Curiously, Republicans in Kevin Landrigan's world rarely fall under this guiding principle.

Adding: Come to think of it, the tipping point for me giving up on Landrigan was when he tied Lynch's response to the Vermont Yankee crisis to Paul Hodes' senate election.

Addinger: Note, by contrast, Pindell's take, who gives Hassan an "UP" mention in his political standing for the week for pushing something for the public good that might be politically bad for her:

The Senate Majority foreshadowed her huge policy gamble of S.B. 505 and some predicted/vowed that this would be the week when the Hassan for Governor 2012 campaign would be derailed. But that didn't happen, did it? Setting aside the policy idea itself and focusing purely on the politics, Hassan was setting the agenda with a bold plan on the dominant issue in American politics. Could she have rolled it out better? Yes. Will there need to be floor amendments to get this thing passed in the Senate? Yes, though it passed committee days after being introduced. Could next week be a disaster for her bill and her politically? Yes, it could.
Dean Barker :: Dems Have No Principles In Kevin Landrigan's World
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A fiscal conservative is a stingy old man who promises (0.00 / 0)
his off-spring an inheritance, if they take good care of him.

Further, people who define "politics" in terms of power/control, rather than as serving the interests of the polis, have control issues--i.e. they are either lacking in self-control or perceive themselves to be impotent.  Indeed, the impulse to control other people may flow from an inability to control oneself.

On the other hand, impotence may be a boon companion of fear and fear may well be rooted in one's youth.  Which may account for why so many conservatives are antagonistic towards both women and their young.


Does the chattering class (0.00 / 0)
have any credibility?  I honestly don't know a soul who reads this guy and is influenced by his writing.  He basically regurgitates talking points and conventional wisdom with no real feel for the electorate.

It simply amazes me how much these people can be wrong and still have jobs.  If I made as many errors in my job as they do, I'd be toast.  

Can't you just see him hunched over his keyboard nodding in agreement with himself?    

In the immediate aftermath of Since the start of the financial crisis, the Fed/Treasury lent, spent, or guaranteed $28 $29 trillion to save the banking system.


Like the Oracle, the purpose of the modern pundit (0.00 / 0)
is to be wrong.  The purpose of the conservatives' pundits is to rile democrats.  What else can it be.  Republicans don't do anything.  Democrats are people who do stuff, so they're the ones that have to be deterred.

I've just learned a new phrase from the DoD.  "Learned helplessness" is what they discovered to be the result of waterboarding SERE trainees and why all but one site stopped using it.  In other words, instead of toughening them against torture, it destroyed their ability to defend themselves.
The object of deprivation is helplessness, unless, of course, it's simply sadistic.


[ Parent ]
Summation of Republican Position (0.00 / 0)


No'm Sayn?


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox