About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

That Was Then, This is Now: Guinta on Social Security

by: William Tucker

Sat Oct 23, 2010 at 17:38:15 PM EDT


(Bumped. - promoted by Dean Barker)

Has Frank Guinta had a change of heart about privatizing Social Security? Or is he lying about his intentions? Voters deserve an answer.

Frank Guinta, September 29, 2010:

I believe we need a solution to preserve Social Security which does not privatize the system, does not raise taxes, and does not cut existing benefits.
Frank Guinta, May 22, 2010:
Government's the problem here, ladies and gentlemen. When Social Security was created, you didn't have the wealth of private sector solutions for lifetime savings that you have today. We have to honor the obligations that have been made to those who are reliant on the federal government - older generations. But future generations should seek different private sector solutions and have personal responsibility start to lead the way. My kids are 6 and 5. They shouldn't know what Social Security is!


Cross-posted to Miscellany Blue
William Tucker :: That Was Then, This is Now: Guinta on Social Security
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Which is scarier this Halloween - (4.00 / 2)
that Frank knows he's lying, or that he really believes this crap?

When Social Security was created, you didn't have the wealth of private sector solutions for lifetime savings that you have today.

You certainly DID have those private-market investment choices in the years leading up to the Great Depression.

I believe it was Joe Kennedy (the patriarch) who said about the 1920s: "I knew it was time to get out of the market when my cabdrivers started giving me stock tips."


Note the adjective (4.00 / 3)
He says he does not want to cut "existing benefits". if you are  collecting social security today, your benefits won't be cut. Everyone else, look out. It is code for raising the age of retirement and means testing.



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


The UnCola (4.00 / 2)
That language also covers freezing current benefit checks at today's levels - even when inflation should drive them up.

[ Parent ]
Yup. (4.00 / 3)
He is declaring open season on the theft of all the money you and I and everyone else not currently collecting have contributed to the system for decades.

We put the money in from our paychecks, and we won't get it back on the return end.

This is robbery with nice words.

birch, finch, beech


[ Parent ]
Believe it or not, at least one (0.00 / 0)
GOPer has Guinta beat on this in terms of either sheer ignorance or duplicity:

I have argued for allowing newcomers to the Social Security system to have the option of private accounts. I have not argued for privatizing the Social Security system.

Come to think of it, this is like the CliffsNotes of Guinta's untenable "position" on Social Security.

birch, finch, beech


The pile of mendacity coming (4.00 / 1)
from this candidate is so high, NHDP had to put it all on one site just to document all the atrocities.



birch, finch, beech



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox