About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

It Might be Harder than You Think to Win Back the Statehouse

by: Tim Ashwell

Thu Apr 07, 2011 at 17:42:09 PM EDT


(Key part of the GOP strategy to disenfranchise voters. (Portion moved below the fold.) - promoted by William Tucker)

Next Tuesday, April 12, at 1:00 p.m. the New Hampshire House Election Law Committee will hold a hearing on SB129, AN ACT relative to presenting photo identification to vote in person and relative to the election fund.

Senate Bill 129, passed in the Senate last week, purports to be aimed at preventing voter fraud but is, in reality, nothing but an attempt to prevent certain groups of people from voting. The primary target is the 80,000 college students who are currently eligible to vote in NH. The collateral damage will be to the 40,000 or so elderly, disabled, poor and members of minority groups who don't have current government issued photo IDs.

Tim Ashwell :: It Might be Harder than You Think to Win Back the Statehouse
Under SB129, people already registered to vote would have to produce a current military ID, current passport, current NH driver's license or current NH non-driver ID before receiving a ballot on Election Day. The bill allows student IDs and employee IDs with an expiration date but, since NH student IDs and state employee IDs don't include an expiration date, they can't be used.

If you don't have one of the IDs, you'll have to have a picture taken at the polling place before you can get a ballot. The digital mug shot will be kept "on file." SB129 doesn't address privacy or security concerns. It doesn't explain who will have access to the photos or if they can be used for purposes other than voter identification. Will the photos be stored with your voter registration form which includes your name, birth date, place of birth, current address, partial social security number and signature? Will they be stored online and subject to hacking?

There is no form of voter fraud that can be prevented by taking citizens' pictures at the polling place on Election Day. The only possible result of this legislation will be to discourage certain groups of citizens from voting.

While many people think everyone has a driver's license, the truth is that tens of thousands of citizens in NH don't have a photo ID that meets the requirements of SB129. These include elderly people who stopped driving years ago, disabled people who have never had a driver's license, poor people who can't afford the documents needed to acquire a driver's license, minorities who are less likely to own a car or drive, and thousands of students who don't bring cars to school so have never needed to get a NH license. Most students without a NH license are underage so they have no reason to pay for a NH non-driver ID either.

All of these citizens can appear at the polls on Election Day and register to vote using other forms of identification to satisfy NH's voter registration laws. They will not, however, be given a ballot unless they agree to let someone at the polls take their picture.

For the elderly, just getting into another line for another process may be too physically demanding. For those who are too poor to get a license, the process will be humiliating. For many disabled people who struggle already to get to the polls, this is another obstacle to full participation in society. And, for many young people it will, undoubtedly, be seen as a hassle and unnecessary waste of time especially in one of the many polling places that handle 10,000 or more voters on Election Day.

This bill is being pushed hard by Speaker O'Brien, the Republican House leadership and by a number of national organizations like ALEC. If it passes, the electoral landscape could radically change by 2012.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Redisticting (0.00 / 0)
may also have an effect.

Guns & Voting (0.00 / 0)
The Concord Monitor has a cartoon opinion on the issue, too!

I'm envisioning Republican and Democratic challengers (0.00 / 0)
each saying "That doesn't look like you!" to alternate voters.

What fun.


what about (0.00 / 0)
absentee voters?  

absentee voters (0.00 / 0)
It doesn't apply to absentee voters but, unlike many other states, there is a law that says you really have to be out-of-town, sick or in a nursing home to vote absentee.  You can't - legally - vote absentee just to evade the law. My town clerk enforces the law.

[ Parent ]
The law, I believe: (0.00 / 0)
 657:1 Absence, Religious Observance, and Disability Absentee Voting. - Any person who is absent on the day of any state election from the city, town, or unincorporated place in which he or she is registered to vote or who cannot appear in public on any election day because of his or her observance of a religious commitment or who is unable to vote there in person by reason of physical disability may vote at such elections as provided in this chapter. A person who is unable to appear at any time during polling hours at his or her polling place because an employment obligation requires the person to remain physically at work or to be in transit to or from work from the time the polls open until after the time the polls close shall be considered absent for purposes of this chapter.


[ Parent ]
"...because an employment obligation requires the person to remain physically at work..." (0.00 / 0)
Ah.  So people who have their own companies like me are authorized to write our own hall passes and get out of the school assembly, but the rest of you need a note from a "respectable" member of society like your boss before you can exercise your Constitutional rights without getting your face put on file for official inspection and verification by other respectable members of society.

They ought to bring in the TSA body scanners.  Just to get a more thorough and detailed record for identification purposes, of course.

I wonder if some of those people who are going to have the ability to write their own excuse notes from the identity-checking they're requiring for everyone else helped to arrange the Citizens United ruling to allow themselves to put on "corporate person" masks and carry out their other, ahem, "participation" in politics - why that's all just freedom and liberty and First Amendment stuff, y'know.

But the rest of us object to "just for safety's sake" extra recording of our identity that's going to accidentally be used to disenfranchise people by "mistake" at some point in the future?  Preposterous!  The security of democracy is at stake!  Really, how can anyone justify not complying for the good of all?


[ Parent ]
Or your workers. (0.00 / 0)
Yes, if the business owner is off at the G8 summit in Switzerland, he can vote absentee.

But if he sends a worker to New Haven on a week-long construction job, the worker can too.


[ Parent ]
I dont think anyone needs a note from employer. (0.00 / 0)

whether you are employer or employee, you  have to sign an oath under  penalty of perjury that you qualify.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

[ Parent ]
It's an Enforcement Issue (0.00 / 0)
It's been common for campaigns to ask their workers and key volunteers to vote absentee so they can be available for campaign business on Election Day. In Durham, our worthy opponents have been known to keep an eye peeled for known activists - and if we're spotted within the town boundaries while the polls are open, they inform election officials.

That's fine - read RSA 657:1 above; you must be "absent from the town" unless at work or on your way to or from work. Since we run elections by the book here in Durham - obeying all the rules and enforcing them fully and fairly to make sure eligible voters can cast their ballots as provided by law - I've got no problem with that.

If you do vote absentee and then find yourself in town on Election Day due to a change in plans, you can show up at the polls and inform the moderator who will destroy your absentee ballot and allow you to vote in person.


[ Parent ]
Agreed with a proviso--- (4.00 / 1)

What controls is the persons good faith belief at the time they turn in the ballot. If someone sends in an absentee ballot, and circumstances later change and the reason they originally thought would make them eligible to vote absenteeno longer is operative, they are under no obligation to vote in person-- their absentee ballot is valid.

Under no circumstances do the local election officials have the authority to void a ballot against the wishes of the voter because they think that person should not have voted by absentee ballot. The vote is still valid -- but if the person lied on the affidavit they are subject to criminal penalties.

(This is not to say that some local official may not incorrectly rule a ballot out upon challenge. I have seen both sides incorrectly but successfully challenge ballots because "the person has been seen in town".)


"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  


[ Parent ]
It will be good for the electronic imaging industry, however. (0.00 / 0)
I still haven't figured out how come that enterprise keeps looking for a guaranteed market.  It all started in the early seventies with audio-visual equipment for the schools--stuff that hardly ever got used.  Now we've got cameras and monitors everywhere that nobody looks at.  Most of the weigh stations along the highways are long gone.  

I believe they actually have a lobbyist in Concord.... (0.00 / 0)
Just like the prison-building industry does.
And the credit card processing one
Etc. Etc. Etc.
If there's a business interest to be served, you can be sure we'll serve them!
People... not so much.

"No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." Albert Einstein

[ Parent ]
privacy and security concerns with sb129 (4.00 / 1)
1. This bill will require every citizen to have a current, government-issued photo ID in order to be allowed to vote. In the past, people have had a choice about whether or not they would allow the government to collect and store their photo and personal information. There is no fundamental right to drive or travel so getting a driver's license, a non-driver's license or a passport is a choice.

Now, for the first time, a citizen's fundamental constitutional right to vote is being subordinated to a plan to require every citizen to allow the government to keep a digital photo on file along with other identifying information.

2. SB129 does not place any restrictions on the use of the photos or who has access to the photos.

3. Why does SB129 call for digital photos? Digital photos are used by law enforcement for facial recognition and surveillance operations. Will law enforcement agencies have access to the files?

4.  Years of investigations have shown that impersonating another person in order to vote is not a problem in NH or any other state. There is no other form of voter fraud that could be prevented by requiring a current, government-issued photo ID. This is an example of the government demanding every citizen conform to some new government dictate for a problem that doesn't exist.

Think in terms of the pat-downs, shoe inspections and body scans of every single person who gets on a plane even though it's clear that every single person is not a terrorist.  


Paranoid (4.00 / 5)
The GOP has forever been convinced there is a vast liberal conspiracy to commit massive voter fraud. In their minds, how else could there be so many people who vote for Democrats? It must be voter fraud!

This is just another one of their 'solutions' to a problem that doesn't exist that in reality, amounts to voter suppression.

Aaron / Deering. Kuster 2012: http://www.kusterforcongress.com/


I think your second point (4.00 / 1)
is spot on.  Republicans are a shrinking tent and can only survive by reducing participation as much as is possible.

In Democracy at Risk, the author's provide some stats on income distribution, party affiliation, and civic engagement.  When you look at the data and examine the Republican strategy, it makes perfect sense.  

"Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind, and are not, however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world." A. Einstein


[ Parent ]
Conservatives believe the worst of their fellow man. In part, that's because (0.00 / 0)
they sense their own nefarious intent.  In part, it's because human "frailties" justify their domination of their fellow man. Then too, presuming the worst means there will be fewer surprises and no surprises = security.  Security = nirvana.  Just not social security because that means relying on unpredictable humans.

See, it all depends on one's preconceived notions.


[ Parent ]
Winning the State House is not really the issue. The issue is popular (0.00 / 0)
government and public officials who respect and deliver stewardship. Conservatives need to be told that they are incompetent and they need to be booted out.
This session of the legislature is going to prove a colossal waste of time and energy and resources and that has to be laid at the door of the Republican party and the people who elected these incompetents.
I'm reluctant to identify these incompetents as Republicans.  However, that party did let them use their moniker and they need to answer for that.  They can call them a caucus or whatever, but Republicans have to answer for the debacle. You bring roaches into the house, you're responsible for the infestation.

I like that (4.00 / 1)
only I might say, "if you bring bed bugs into the house..."  But I have struggled with blaming this on the Republicans, because I keep being told that it isn't all of them, and some of them are our "friends."  Yet some of them went out of their way last fall to recruit these very destructive people, and, as you say, the party let them run a Republicans, and we are pretty sure if they had run on their own platforms they would not have been elected.  So I will hold the Rs responsible, and ask those who wish to be my "friends"  to apologize to me and my fellow citizens.

[ Parent ]
This voter id business (4.00 / 3)
is, I believe, part of the national republican agenda to suppress voting by those they don't like, the poor, the elderly, the disabled (remember, send them off to Siberia and let them freeze to death.)

Much of what we've seen this year from the so-called republicans is part of a national agenda and the strings are being pulled by the likes of the Koch Brothers and their minions, like Dick Armey and Karl Rove aka turd-blossom.  


and this, (4.00 / 1)
in spite of all their posturing and breast-beating in rejecting Real ID.  Such philosophical 'consistency' in mind-boggling.

(I'm the poster formerly known as Thomas Simmons)

[ Parent ]
obstacles to voting (0.00 / 0)
I don't think it's a coincidence that in the past 10 years, NH's Hispanic population has grown by 79% and the Asian population has grown by 78%.


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox