About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

"Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line."

by: Douglas E. Lindner

Wed Oct 12, 2011 at 15:55:34 PM EDT


(with Presidential candidates)

That time-tested adage might be wrong.

In 2000, Al Gore was not the candidate he could have been, not the candidate he might have been had he come back and "Let Bartlet Gore Be Gore" in '04 or '08, and his victory was too narrow to stick (I know, Florida, and I agree, but stay with me here). In 2004, John Kerry--though a good Senator--was not the candidate we needed.

Republicans fell in love with Bush; Democrats fell in line with Gore and Kerry.

In 2008, it was our turn. Despite a more divisive primary process, Democrats fell in love (as we would have with Hillary Clinton), and Republicans fell in line with John McCain.  It was the most decisive Democratic victory in a Presidential election since 1966.  As far as I can tell (and I looked into it), President Obama received more votes than any candidate for any office in any country, ever. (sidenote: America is the second most populous democracy, but India, a parliamentary democracy, does not directly elect its leader)

2012 will be tough, and liberals take issue with some things President Obama has done or not done, but the numbers are clear: Democrats, liberals, and Americans in general like Barack Obama personally.  They may not approve of everything he's done, and when the country is hurting, criticism (misplaced or otherwise) is to be expected.  But people still support this person being their leader.  And most of us know--some deeper down than others--that he's much, much better than the alternative.

Here's the thing: there is no alternative. Perry? Cain? Bachmann? Paul? Who is it?

Conventional Wisdom points to Mitt Romney. He's nobody's favorite. He's not the most conservative or the most moderate. He's not the most likable or the most inspiring. He's not the most genuine or the most opportunistic. But Republicans like him because they think he's the guy that can defeat a President they hate.

Personally, I think given the current field, it has to be Romney. Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann won't survive a devastating blow coming their way from New Hampshire independents, Herman Cain will have trouble with southern conservatives, Ron Paul is a niche candidate, and Jon Huntsman has Obama cooties (which is unfortunate, because he'd be a better President than the others at that table last night).

So that leaves the GOP with Romney-Christie 2012. That doesn't exactly scream "Morning in America".

Republicans better hope they fall in line this time.

Douglas E. Lindner :: "Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line."
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Good call, Doug. (0.00 / 0)
I said much the same in a family conversation at dinner tonight, but you said it much better than I could have.

If Christie will veep, you got the top of the ticket nailed unless somebody gets the LDS willies somewhere along the line.

They. Don't. Care.
We do.
Rinse, repeat.


He denies it, but I expect (0.00 / 0)
Marco Rubio to be the nominee.  Florida and the Latino vote are both critical to electoral college victory.

Also: George W. Bush easily survived a devastating blow from NH independents in 2000.  The difference now is that Bachmann, Perry, Cain are worse candidates than the Decider.  Say what you want about the worst president in the history of the republic, but W. was a great campaigner.

birch paper; on Twitter @deanbarker


I was thinking Huckabee's 11% five days after winning Iowa (0.00 / 0)
Do you mean Rubio for VP?

--
Hope > Anarch-tea
Twitter: @DougLindner


[ Parent ]
Yes, that's a typo. (3.50 / 2)
Rubio as Veep nominee.

birch paper; on Twitter @deanbarker

[ Parent ]
Remember the Enthusiasm Gap? (0.00 / 0)
No one is excited about Romney.

And good news today from NBC/Wall St Journal poll:
nearly 40% support Occupy Wall St!

Time for Democrats to connect with the passion!!

No'm Sayn?



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox