About
A progressive online community for the Granite State. More...
Getting Started
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


The Masthead
Managing Editors

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
NH Progressive Blogs
Betsy Devine
Citizen Keene
Democracy for NH
Equality Press
The Political Climate
Granite State Progress
Chaz Proulx
Susan the Bruce

NH Political Links
Graniteprof
Granite Status
Kevin Landrigan
NH Political Capital
Political Chowder (TV)
Political Chowder (AM)
PolitickerNH
Pollster (NH-Sen)
Portside with Burt Cohen
Bill Siroty
Swing State 2008

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Carol Shea-Porter
Paul Hodes
Jeanne Shaheen
Barack Obama (NH)

ActBlue Hampshire
Stop Sununu
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Bob Geiger
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

RSS Feed

Blue Hampshire RSS


Dodd will not auction off supporters

by: Mike Caulfield

Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 21:28:35 PM EST


Found this interesting, Dodd says he won't cut viability deals at the Iowa caucus, because the people working for him put in their sweat to work for him, not someone else:

Dodd: Yea, I'm totally opposed to that and let me take advantage of the interview Andrea saying don't make any calls to my office, any campaigns...I didn't come here and spend a year campaigning in Iowa...working and expect the people who committed themselves to me at my behest and support someone else. They made a decision to be for me and I'm grateful to them.

From Crooks and Liars.

With Dodd polling what he's polling, I have to admit, this makes me a little nervous. With me out here, ready to canvass, there's part of me that wants him to cut a deal if it gets him to New Hampshire. And my inner Machiavelli recoils at not fighting fire with fire.

But at the same time, I have to say that this is exactly what I love about the guy, and his campaign.

He has realized from the beginning that he is representing his supporters -- his supporters are not representing him. He's allowed his volunteers and staff to talk freely with the press, and he's been careful to portray the causes he's taken up not as his own, but as ones he shares with his supporters.

He's truly what I would consider a movement candidate, and that's because he understands it's not about him. It's about our shared goals.

So, reluctantly, I have to concede -- he demonstrated what it is to truly be a people-powered candidate this cycle, and it would be a shame to compromise that on the home stretch.

If he does not reach viability at a location, the only instruction his supporters will have is to do what they think is best.

Damn, I love this guy.

Update, Additional Transcription from the video:

DODD: This is not an auction. And I think that candidates and campaigns that do it just contribute to the cynicism that a lot of people have about politics.

MITCHELL: Well, assuming that the people that want to cast their vote for you in the caucus tomorrow night are really committed and passionate about you, Chris Dodd, what happens assuming you don't reach the 15%. To be realistic, then what do you do on the second round?

DODD: Well, that's their business. That's not my business. And that's the point I'm making here.

Mike Caulfield :: Dodd will not auction off supporters
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I saw this story today in the Hill (4.00 / 2)
Here's a different quote:
Dodd said on MSNBC that rival campaigns have been seeking a second-choice endorsement from his languishing campaign, which has consistently polled in the low single digits in the state.

...

Pressed for what he had been offered by opponents, Dodd declined to elaborate but said voters should be offended by such arrangements.

"The idea that I would go around telling key supporters of mine that tomorrow night, if for whatever reason we didn't get 15 percent, I want you to do the following - I'm not sure I'd vote for me," Dodd said. "The idea that you're trying to market me, auction me off to some other campaign, would truly bother me."



Wonder if Sununu's fired now.

Fifteen democrats. (0.00 / 0)
There are fifteen candidates on the democratic ballot.  No one questions that the bottom seven are not being asked about in polls.  Why should we assume that the eight top ones are?  
We do know that when the LA Times did a poll, Dodd was not on the list.

The press reports that there are "internal polls" conducted by the campaigns.  These reports leave people with the impression that other polls by media organizations are somehow more objective.  What evidence do we have to support that impression?

After every election in which pre-election polls don't match the results, there's always a story about how some special tracking poll was right on the mark and the results we got could have been predicted.  Then we discovered that in Ohio in 2004, the electoral "results" were used to "adjust" the exit polling.  

Frankly, I care less about Chris Dodd being President than I do about changing our electoral process to the point where who's doing what, when and where is actually clear.  The script which assigns candidates all of the action (like horses actually running in a race) is misleading.  Minimizing the role of the electors is not good for democracy and it contributes to the swelling of politicians' heads.


[ Parent ]
Have lunch with Chris (0.00 / 0)
Chris Dodd will be having lunch with Keene Democrats this Friday Jan. 4 at noon - EF Lane Hotel on Main Street-no reservations necessary.

Come and join us!


Crap! (0.00 / 0)
I have a business lunch on that day. Will try to reschedule.



[ Parent ]
I'm an Edwards supporter (4.00 / 2)
but I really like Dodd.  This was a classy statement.  

Whiel I support Edwards, I cannot help (4.00 / 1)
but also be impressed by Dodd.

He's right in this.  


I just put up (4.00 / 3)
a make-shift Chris Dodd for President lawn sign made out of two rally signs, a metal wire from the '06 election, and some staples. It seemed a little flimsy when I put it in the snow bank, but I expect by the morning it will be frozen solid in position. I really appreciate that he respects the judgment of his supporters, and I wish more people were open to giving him their consideration.

I've received a phone call from just about every campaign  (and many from the Obama people!), trying to persuade me that maybe their guy is a better choice, more "viable", and all sorts of other things, but I'm pretty confident that Dodd is the best guy for the job, and I feel a bit of an obligation as a New Hampshire voter -- especially in my first presidential primary -- to vote sincerely on that basis.


Obvi (0.00 / 0)
Dodd is pretty much just stating the obvious. If my candidate wasn't viable, it would be my decision to make another choice. Anyone who goes against their interest to do what a politician said is a sheep.

Taking that stand is clear, though hardly noble.


Developing. (0.00 / 0)
We are still a developing democracy.  It's only been forty years that all adult Americans have been able to fully exercise their civil rights.

Powered by: SoapBlox