About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Why I'm Supporting Governor Bill Richardson

by: stevemarchand

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 00:48:16 AM EDT


( - promoted by Dean Barker)

Monday afternoon, I publicly announced my support of Gov. Bill Richardson for President.  As Democrats, we are very fortunate - this is, in my opinion, the deepest field of presidential candidates since at least 1992.  That said, we live at a time when we have many difficult challenges ahead of us.  How we exit Iraq in a way that leaves the region with the best chance of stability.  How we create a 21st century economy based on domestic, diverse, and sustainable energy sources.  How we assure universal access to quality health care, irrespective of one's socioeconomic status.  How we strengthen our economy to ensure the growth of the middle class, and the long-term solvency of Social Security and Medicare.  Protection of our civil liberties, and a woman's right to choose.  The list goes on - and I believe Bill Richardson is the person best equipped to address these challenges, and reverse the course set by the Bush Administration.  See why below the fold...
stevemarchand :: Why I'm Supporting Governor Bill Richardson
I'm supporting Bill Richardson for several reasons:

1)  Ideology - No candidate better matches my ideology on domestic and fiscal policy than Governor Richardson. 

His record of fiscal conservatism as Governor shows that you can watch the bottom line and still support critical investments in education and social services. 

He is environmentally progressive, and has used strong incentives to encourage R&D in 21st century environmental and energy technologies.

He gets that if you want the Middle East to stop believing that America's plans for Iraq include a long-term occupation, you need to remove our military presence, and create an environment that allows for diplomacy.

On education, his plan heavily emphasizes providing incetives for attracting teachers into the profession, and reducing the cost of their education through post-graduation public service.  He would repeal No Child Left Behind, rather than simply fix it.  It needs to be scrapped.

Of course, on issues such issues as choice, gun rights, and gay rights, he believes in the strong protection of our civil liberties.

2)  Experience - Executive experience as a successful governor.  A former congressman.  The U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations for President Clinton, as well as the former Secretary of Energy.  He's negotiated concessions form some of the world's most difficult nations, including Iraq, North Korea, and Sudan.  He's dealt with immigration, as a governor of a key border state.

Most Americans say they want a president who can work with people across the political spectrum to get things done.  Consider this:  if you can successfully talk with the leaders of North Korea or Iraq, then working with Republicans and members of Congress shouldn't be too much a of a stretch.  We need experienced leadership on day one in 2009, and this field has a lot of it - I believe Bill Richardson's depth and breadth of experience is clearly the best of the field.

3)  Personality & Politics - After speaking with him many times, and seeing him in action many times further, I must say - I like him personally quite a bit.  He's extremely approachable, conversational and witty, and is very good at retail politics.  In a lot of ways, the NH Primary is truly just getting underway, with about a 70-day sprint ahead of us.  Most voters have not made up their mind, and if they get a chance to see Gov. Richardson, they will like him.

In terms of the politics, this will be a tight general election.  He is a Latino governor of a swing state, with strong legislative, executive, and diplomatic credentials.  He is the best general election match up for us Democrats, and he is making progress in the early primary-caucus states, all leading up to Super Duper Tuesday on February 5th - a day heavy on states in the West and Southwest.

I'll be very active on the campaign, acting as an advisor and a frequent surrogate.  I've run statewide and congressional campaigns, I've been mayor of the most Democratic city in the state, and I've run for statewide office, receiving a lot of wonderful support across New Hampshire.  This election is too important not to get involved in a meaningful way, and I'll have that opportunity for Governor Richardson.  I'd ask all of you to consider him, as well, and thanks again for all you do to make this a premier progressive site on the blogosphere.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Well said (0.00 / 0)
I was hoping Mayor Marchand would support Governor Richardson.  It's a good fit; the kind of pragmatic idealism they both bring to the table is desperately needed in Washington.

--
Hope > Anarch-tea
Twitter: @DougLindner


Not proven experience (0.00 / 0)
I agree that BR has a long and impressive resume, but this and those items listed on it, do not equate into the necessary experience to be president. The first reasoning item: "How we exit Iraq in a way that leaves the region with the best chance of stability" is enough to make the case against BR. Everybody is running away from the 'pull all troops out immediately' concept, and for good reason, as Colin Powell said, we broke it, we fix it.
However, we do need a plan besides 'wait and see' as the front-runners suggest...possibly until 2013.
His experience card is great compared to the front-runners, but doesn't cut it compared to the other candidates running who have actually have brought republicans and democrats together. He is good, but simply not the best candidate running.

Iraq cannot be "fixed" (0.00 / 0)
by setting up an extension of our poorly-conceived missile defense shield and using Iraq as an espionage grid. 
Russia and China are not going to put up with it.

Putin's comparison to the Caribbean Missile crisis is not an idle comment.  What we call the Cuban Missile Crisis was started by the U.S. placing missiles in Turkey, contrary to JFK's directive to the Pentagon. 
While I don't doubt that the Bushes are fully informed about the offensive/defensive installations being erected in Iraq, the American people aren't.  When the financial and business community realizes that their communications are insecure, they are not going to be pleased and the international community is likely to distance itself.


[ Parent ]
No, it cannot (0.00 / 0)
And I found that "pottery barn" metaphor disturbing at the time, and still do.

The fact is, out of the field, only Kucinich, Obama and Richardson (and Gravel) had nothing to do with this horrific situation. Voting to authorize the use of force carries the same culpability as deciding to use it. The Senators and US Reps who authorized are morally responsible for this war and its aftermath.

Many people have given a pass to their favorite candidates for this, and that's okay for them. No candidate will be "perfect", that's already been established. But for me, it's the main thing, the deal breaker, as it were. Other missteps, gaffes, whatever, pale in comparision to starting a war of aggression like this, one without a defensible reason. We all know there were no WMDs, just like we know Gore actually won Florida. But people like Scott Ritter, Hans Blix, et.al were saying this at the time.

Bill Richardson has experience governing a multi-ethnic border state that has a high level of poverty, environmental problems, etc. It's a microcosm of the US, really. I can understand why people support his presidential bid.


[ Parent ]
"His experience card is great compared to the front-runners, but doesn't cut it compared to the other candidates running who have actually have brought republicans and democrats together." (0.00 / 0)
That's simply not true.  Richardson, a Democratic Governor of a Republican state, was re-elected  in 2006 with the largest margin of victory in his state's history, and with the support of 40% of Republicans, if memory serves.

--
Hope > Anarch-tea
Twitter: @DougLindner


[ Parent ]
Well Put (0.00 / 0)
I especially appreciate your comments on his personality.  His approachable nature and sense of humor are important aspects of the Governor that are often overlooked.  They may seem insignificant, but it's rare to find someone who can preserve his or her personality throughout decades of public life.

Steve, I appologize for the above post...I wish I could delete it.... (0.00 / 0)
It is much harsher than I intended.  I'm just really cranky at Richardson for his behavior regarding our primary when it really counted.  And I shouldn't be taking it out on you.

What I really mean, I guess, is, you are a leader in the Democratic Party in NH.  How did you reconcile his Primary behavior and your ultimate support of his Presidency, especially considering the quality of other candidates on the Democratic side?

Yeah.  That tone is what I mean.  I have to keep reminding myself that you are part of the Concord Coalition and should be treated that way: As a fiscally responsible leader.


Status Quo Gone Wild (4.00 / 2)

Yo, NHPC. You are a wingnut that regularly flies off the handle in defense of your precious STATUS QUO. I first noticed this when Marchand was still in the race. In a Dairy by Dean:

For Shaheen, "There is No Sense of Time" About Senate Decision

by: Dean Barker
Fri Sep 07, 2007 at 06:02:33 AM EDT

You commented:Shaheen's record is winning.
"None of the other candidates with whom you want to put your trust in to change the direction of the country have a record of anything with nearly the electoral success of Jeanne Shaheen; in fact, some of the candidates have a distinct record of not winning elections.  And in Marchand's case he won the equivalent of a very small city's (Portsmouth)city council race. "

I did read Northwood's post:
"I've observed the grass roots for many decades while Governor Shaheen has effectively and competently contributed to those movements.  It always seems that the Democratic Party has a wing of newcomer cannibals who rather than pay their dues, like Governor Shaheen has done, spew all this grandiose crap only to produce enormous electoral damage for your Party and, ultimately, and in not that much time, frankly, they fade into oblivion.
You seem to be part of that wing.  It's nothing new.  You're nothing special. It's really the same old, same old.  If you pay your dues, and hang around long enough, you'll begin to understand what I'm talking about.  Unfortunately, that wing never seems to endure that long....
If Jeanne Shaheen runs she'll easily win the primary.  She's never been eaten by your cannibal wing yet.  It  really doesn't matter what any of the other candidates do - except it will matter for their own long term careers."

Seems like you just fly until you get the call from your handler, pulling the reigns back in. Then its all shits and grins and "let's play nice".

True colors, baby. The delete button ain't always gonna be there to cover your mess up.

Put your ear to the grass, baby! Hear that?

CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"Ill writers are usually the sharpest censors." - John Dryden  


[ Parent ]
Show us your quips ! (0.00 / 0)
SQGW !

Next time, there may be no next time.

[ Parent ]
nhpoliticscom (0.00 / 0)
...does not have my politics, and when he initially came here acted sometimes more like this was NHInsider.

But that was then this is now and we're glad to have him. The site has now over 20,000 comments -- wipe out the arrogant ones, from all of us, and how many are left (and how many of yours, SGS?)

I'm frankly glad for our cynical general election focussed friends. On net, they are more correct, and more productive, than the idealists.

It's good to kick against the pricks, but sometimes if you want the yoke off you have to be more strategic.

And I'm sick of hearing about a "change" election. You know what will be a change? Not having freakin macho-driven xenophobic madmen  at the helm of the largest military in the world.

Is Hillary more macho-obsessed than Richardson? Yeah, and that puts me off. But on the scale of things the "change" you are pushing, if it is the difference between Hillary and Obama, is just so laughably small if that's the slogan.

It's a difference, sure. But "CHANGE!!!"? Writ large?

I mean come on, this is starting to get Orwellian.

I doubt I'll vote in the primary for Hillary because there are things that I do not like about a) Clinton I, and b) Hillary's career in the Senate.

I doubt I'll vote for Obama because it's a grassroots movement about about being a grassroots movement so that people can sit around and talk about how freaking grassroots they are.

I actually find the second thing more annoying. With the first thing, at least I have some confidence the campaign can win by selling it's soul. Better yet, I'm pretty sure the campaign will get a good price on it, and I may even be appreciative of the deal.

With the second, there's no soul to sell, just a lot of Capital-N Nouns like CHANGE and HOPE ground up into a flavorless pablum.

Wow. Cranky today. Flame on.



[ Parent ]
Flame for Flame (0.00 / 0)
Had admin not airbrush the site by deleting the wack at Marchand, who is really not my concern, my flame hand would have stayed.

I am not sure why NHPC's comment was deleted. It certainly only embarrassed the commentor. I'm sure Marchand has thicker skin then blue hamsters might expect.

Admin does enjoy the presence of brand name figures. I hope you don't make it a habit of providing sanctuary to ensure repeat performances.

That is a losing game, if that is the one you are playing.

BH is a great blog. In Goldilocks terms, it is "just right". We can police ourselves for the most part. Keep the divine hand where it belongs. You can pick that spot.

As for the politics of "change vs. status quo", we will have to see. The jury is still out.

Don't expect me to shudder. I got my game face on.

Your point about the hand party over in the grasslands has some merit. Frankly, I have been keen to this as well. Change does need energy, not just money and circle love is a good base camp.. How Obama follows through can only be known by knowing. HRC is a known quantity and I don't want no more.

As for Obama or Edwards being able to deliver. Lets just say I have a trust. Neither of those two talk to us like we are powerless victims.

'cause, Mike, not only do I have my game face on, I got my sleeves rolled up.


"Ill writers are usually the sharpest censors." - John Dryden  


[ Parent ]
SGS, What a grouch... (0.00 / 0)
I'm just trying to give Marchand the benefit of the doubt that he's truly Concord Coalition, and fiscally responsible. I became aware of him when he was associated with a very different ideological faction than that.  The jury is still out on that.  But he should have the benefit of the doubt, at least from me, at least for now.

But no, there was no embarrassment in that deleted post.  It just wasn't accurate with what I wanted to say and I'm glad it was deleted.  But not because it was embarrassing to me, only because we need to foster political careers when they are fiscally responsible.  I'll take fiscally responsible people, from any Party, any way I can get them.  And I'll clobber fiscally irresponsible people, from any Party, any time I identify them.  Period.  Hopefully my first impression of Marchand is just not who he is.

Imagine if we put the money we spend on the REPUBLICAN INTEREST EXPENSE PORK PROGRAM into health care.....

So Sleeping Giant, are you happy with Bill Richardson's very aggressive attack on New Hampshire's primary when his support really counted?


[ Parent ]
I'm a Masshole (0.00 / 0)
I do relish the NH primary, but since our economy isn't underpinned by it. I don't really care.

Some say that NH isn't diverse enough to deserve the status. I don't agree. NH, mixed with a few other states, fills a key role by testing candies on their "indie" side.

As for embarassment, you basically accused Marchand of selling out his endorsement. It went something like - Are you looking out for yourself or are you protecting NH?

That was grouchie, yo.

I'm a Paul Tsongas fan, so you can kiss my Lowell!

Now I'm grouchie. Kathy, make it stop!

"Ill writers are usually the sharpest censors." - John Dryden  


[ Parent ]
I coordinated Leominster for Paul in the primary in 78. (0.00 / 0)
So we do agree on something.  Paul Tsongas was clearly one of the very best of the very best.  I'd be for Paul this year too if he were running....:)  And I really like the Democratic crop this cycle.  But Paul was the best.  And still would be.

[ Parent ]
Everything (4.00 / 1)
Everything you said is exactly true and I completely agree
BR has the experience and I agree with him on most of the issues

BR's biggest thing against him is people knowing him
He needs to get his name all over the place.
I hope we can all aid BR with this problem

Obama/Biden '08


As much as I like Richardson as a person (0.00 / 0)
The debate last night showed why he isn't the best choice we have for president.  He was awkward and apologetic for Clinton.  And truth be told I can't think of a single point he made that stood out.  He seems to be the kind of guy that works best behind the scenes.

Are you kidding? (0.00 / 0)
He didn't stand up for Hillary; he denounced the other candidates for going negative, which he was right to do.

As for "a single point", he was the only one who gave specifics on his energy and education plans, which leads one to wonder: do the other candidates make their own policies as opposed to having the campaign's policy shop cook stuff up for the website? 

Richardson is real, he's positive, and he's ready; it's that simple.

--
Hope > Anarch-tea
Twitter: @DougLindner


[ Parent ]
Richardson (0.00 / 0)
Well hopefully I won't be too mean spirited but I do have to say of the major candidates that are running, he's the one that rubs me the wrong way.  As a Mexican-American, I admit I would love to see the first Latino president and want to support him.  But, there is an arrogance about him that is for lack of a nicer word repulsive to me due to seven years of Bush. 

There is as an example of this the endless reports of his Lincoln Navigator speeding in excess of 100 mph down New Mexico highways.  Let us not even talk about the apology he made between transgressions; an apology that I interpret as giving the finger to everyone who was upset at his actions.  I know, ... everyone speeds.  But not everyone speeds with such impunity as to take advantage of their position in life.  Don't fool yourself that is exactly what he did.  I know if it were me driving like that I would not only get a ticket, I would be arrested and have my car impounded.  He never received a ticket for his many outrageous speeding transgressions.  He's the governor, he knows he can get away with it, and so he decides to do so.  Sound like a familiar pattern?  Yes, the governor is a busy man as he pointed out in his apology.  But is anyone, other than the president during a national crisis, so busy that it necessitates taking away the safety of others?  I think not, and I believe a rational person who is talented enough to be president would know this.

The first word I think of when I think of Richardson is bloviate.  I hate that word.  It is a word created by Warren Harding, one of the few presidents that is possibly worse than Bush.  I hate that word because it is usually hung on politicians who give insightful answers that demonstrate their knowledge on an issue.  Governor Richardson's standard answer to every question is to espouse his support for a variety of programs.  I am a liberal person; I like government.  But, I can't help feel Mr. Richardson's endless proposals, which are usually carbon copies of long held safe democratic positions, come from a desire to say something rather than discuss the evolution of his thinking.  He seems to believe that espousing support for a program is enough.  In short, he leaves me with the impression that he is intellectually lazy about creating his own positions.  He simply adopts others.  This is especially prevalent in his responses to energy, education, and gay rights.  In most years this would not bother me, but years of Bush has shown what adopting other people's positions without any real thought of your own can lead to.  I am not saying he is intellectually lazy, but his answers don't reassure me.

Now it is true that he does have a different position on removing soldiers from Iraq.  But does anyone really believe his position is tenable?  I don't.  I opposed the war from the beginning, but I can't fathom removing all of our soldiers in such a short period of time.  Which leads me to wonder about the motivation for his Iraq position.  Ask him a question on gun control and he is almost apologetic about his position, usually saying the line , "I'm a Governor of a western state"  as if that were a justification for a position that would affect the entire country. 

In previous elections I might have been excited to support Bill Richardson.  But this year is different.  I really want a competent administrator to fix all of the problems George Bush has created.  I want our president to be the person who read ten different books on one issue, not just skimmed through one. I want someone who realizes his mistakes and doesn't treat his own reckless behavior as a partisan joke.  Mr. Richardson might be a great president.  He has a resume that indicates he could be.  But he has not given me a reason to vote for him.  As much as I might personally enjoy seeing a Latino in our  highest office, I just can't support him.


Disclosure (0.00 / 0)
Steve, I respect your leadership and that of Gov. Richardson.  But, consistent with BH norms, you should disclose whether you -- or your political consulting firm -- are on the payroll of the Richardson campaign.

Good Point (0.00 / 0)
A good point by DartmouthDem - there were professional campaign roles available with several of the presidential campaigns, including some that were paid (including Governor Richardson).  I am a senior advisor for the campaign, and will be spending a lot of time on strategy, political outreach, public speaking, and other roles for the campaign.

Obviously, it would be very short-sided for me to put my support behind a candidate that I do not strongly support, irrespective of the role I would play.  I'm a lucky person - the candidate that best matches by positions on Iraq, energy and the environment, taxes, civil liberties, and other issues, and the candidate that I believe would be the most difficult matchup for Republicans in a general election, is also the candidate where I can play a meaningful role in helping him become the nominee.

Incidentally, I think we are all very lucky to love policy and politics, and be in New Hampshire.  When I talk with fellow political junkies in other states, I realize how unique the opportunities are in New Hampshire relative to virtually any other part of the country (Iowans could probably say the same thing).  It should be an exciting next few months in New Hampshire.


Apprenticeship (0.00 / 0)
Steve, since I am from Lowell, I don't know you from a blog in the wall. However, many of my new compatriots at OfA-NH have great things to say about you.

I think you chose wisely. You will see the national play up close and Bill Richardson will be a great mentor.

Smart, Gutsy and Principled.

"The dude abides"

"Ill writers are usually the sharpest censors." - John Dryden  


[ Parent ]
Thanks (0.00 / 0)
Thanks, Steve.  I appreciate your openness.  Never meant to question your motivation -- just want to maintain a protocol that has served Blue Hampshire well.

I have not decided on a candidate in the primary.  I do like Richardson -- he's a sharp guy and an effective governor.  But his Meet the Press interview several months ago really scared me.  It seemed as though he wasn't ready for Russert, and his awkward equivocation on some questions (e.g. his post-DOE employment, Sox-Yankees, etc.) raised serious concerns about his ability to fulfill the communication needs of a presidential candidate.  The last thing I want is another John Kerry -- someone with an utter inability to relate to people on a human level.

Am hoping he proves me wrong in the months to come, as Richardson could be a more electable alternative to the "major" candidates.  We'll see. . . .


[ Parent ]
"The last thing I want is another John Kerry -- someone with an utter inability to relate to people on a human level." (0.00 / 0)
If you meet Richardson, you'll lose that concern entirely.  He's very personable.

As for the Russert interview, Russert hits VERY hard on people whose candidacy he does not respect.  If he went for blood on Hillary, too, she'd have the same experience.

Russert also pursued things in that interview that weren't worth pursuing, except to make the Governor look bad.  Just like he asked questions not worth the time in Tuesday's debate.

--
Hope > Anarch-tea
Twitter: @DougLindner


[ Parent ]
I Hear You (0.00 / 0)
Am keeping an open mind on Richardson -- I have major concerns about all of the candidates, and did not mean to single him out. . . . Getting elected (overwhelmingly) as governor of a purple state is convincing evidence of his electoral abilities.  And the passion of his supporters doesn't hurt, either!

Keep fighting the good fight.


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox