Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
But Philip McLaughlin, the then-attorney general who first hired Ayotte as a prosecutor in 1998, said in an interview last week that while he thinks Ayotte is a "fine attorney," he was troubled by the e-mails.
"When you get on the attorney general e-mail and have those exchanges, it seems to me to be obvious that you have jeopardized the public's right to believe you do things completely apolitically," McLaughlin said.
"I don't know how any adult could read those e-mails and conclude that there was no political consideration. It bothered me to the core when I read it," McLaughlin added.
But really, read the whole thing. Fair use keeps me from quoting so many other key grafs.
According to state law, the Supreme Court must decide if the death sentence was imposed "under the influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor" and whether it "is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases," among other issues.
Professor Albert Scherr of the University of New Hampshire School of Law and attorney Andru Volinsky of Bernstein Shur both said the defense could argue Ayotte's e-mail introduces an "arbitrary factor" into the decision to seek the death penalty. Scherr, who is not connected to either campaign, said the defense could ask the state Supreme Court to re-examine whether the punishment was disproportionate compared with other cases or if it was politically motivated.
"If the defense can show that the only reason this was brought as a capital case and other similar cases in the state were not, simply by virtue of the fact that the attorney general's office at the time saw political advantage to bringing this as a capital case, arguably that could impact the decision," Scherr said.
"Prosecutors are always studiously careful to refrain from making any comment on these cases or their positions on them,'' Volinsky said.
"Now that these e-mails are out in the public domain, I'd be amazed if the public defender's office doesn't try to use them in their appeals in this case.''
The killing of a police officer, and the imposition of the death penalty, are solemn issues; whether it's appropriate to try to derive political advantage from such a case is a question each of us can answer for ourselves.
Today the Concord Monitor editorial board answered:
Former attorney general Kelly Ayotte's televised campaign ads touting her success in prosecuting Michael Addison for the murder of Manchester police officer Michael Briggs are effective and accurate, but they use the grief of the victim's relatives for political purposes. That's both sad and wrong.
...Ayotte's recent ads are, at best, in poor taste. They say, in effect, "Vote for me because I successfully convinced the state to put a human being to death." Using Briggs's death to help elect a politician does not honor his sacrifice.
The heartbreaking, shocking tragedy of the Mont Vernon murder will make it tempting for lawmakers from that area to grandstand on the issue of capital punishment instead of delving into the more complex reasons of why something so awful could happen in the first place.
Will thoughtfulness and restraint be shown by our representatives in the face of such a horrendous crime?
One of the public servants representing Mont Vernon is Bill O'Brien. His recent thoughts on the assisted suicide bill:
Rep. William O'Brien, R-Mont Vernon, said the bill sets up "death panels" that administer what he called "death doses," and asked Weed whether their use should be limited to "death centers."
What an incredible week! Concord was rockin' as the winds of change blew through the capitol.
No matter which side of the political aisle you call home, or if your place of comfort is to straddle the aisle, this most recent session of the New Hampshire House of Representatives - the people's legislature - should have left you exhilarated.
Granted, no one is totally satisfied with the legislation passed. Count me as displeased with several outcomes. But I can live with that. And so can you.
While I am not an adamant opponent of capital punishment - if I were convinced it was applied fairly and with all sorts of safeguards (such as the proposal that Mitt Romney offered in 2004) it wouldn't be a major issue for me - I was, nonetheless annoyed when Jeanne Shaheen vetoed the repeal that passed the NH Legislature. For a state that's gotten along without this since 1939, it was unseemly not to rid ourselves of it.
CONCORD - Following Saddam Hussein's execution Friday night, there was outrage from some citizens and groups in America and worldwide about the Iraqis' choice of hanging as a means of execution.
Some were quoted in news reports as saying lethal injection would have been more humane; and capital punishment opponents complained that Hussein was put to death, regardless of the means used.
New Hampshire residents opposed to the hanging may not know, however, that the Granite State is one of two states in the country that allows hanging as a method of execution.
It's an odd moment, I think, watching with disgust at the jeering that accompanied Saddam's death, realizing what an ugly thing state execution is, yet knowing that as the year begins New Hampshire is preparing the legal case against someone that we aim to hang.
If you believe Wikipedia, a majority of New Hampshire citizens oppose the death penalty in any form. Do they still, after the murder of Michael Briggs? I'd hope so. I'd hope the fact that this now matters would make opposition to our barbaric custom more resolute.
So why I am I hearing no one on this? And if we can't demand an end to the death penalty now, when it actually matters, what does our opposition mean?